Summary:
We have addded new stats and perf_context for measuring the merge and filter operation time consumption.
We have bounded all the merge operations within the GUARD statment and collected the total time for these operations in the DB.
Test Plan: WIP
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34377
Summary:
It would be good to assing background job their IDs. Two benefits:
1) makes LOGs more readable
2) I might use it in my EventLogger, which will try to make our LOG easier to read/query/visualize
Test Plan: ran rocksdb, read the LOG
Reviewers: sdong, rven, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D31617
Summary:
Add a counter for collecting the wait time on db mutex.
Also add MutexWrapper and CondVarWrapper for measuring wait time.
Test Plan:
./db_test
export ROCKSDB_TESTS=MutexWaitStats
./db_test
verify stats output using db_bench
make clean
make release
./db_bench --statistics=1 --benchmarks=fillseq,readwhilewriting --num=10000 --threads=10
Sample output:
rocksdb.db.mutex.wait.micros COUNT : 7546866
Reviewers: MarkCallaghan, rven, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D32787
Summary:
1. If WAL directory is different from db directory. Sync the directory after creating a log file under it.
2. After creating an SST file, sync its parent directory instead of DB directory.
3. change the check of kResetDeleteUnsyncedFiles in fault_injection_test. Since we changed the behavior to sync log files' parent directory after first WAL sync, instead of creating, kResetDeleteUnsyncedFiles will not guarantee to show post sync updates.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D32067
Summary: Based on @sdong's feedback in the diff, we shouldn't keep db_mutex in CompactionJob's state. This diff removes db_mutex from CompactionJob state, by making next_file_number_ atomic. That way we only need to pass the lock to InstallCompactionResults() because of LogAndApply()
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: sdong, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28491
Summary:
Here's a prototype of redesigning pending_outputs_. This way, we don't have to expose pending_outputs_ to other classes (CompactionJob, FlushJob, MemtableList). DBImpl takes care of it.
Still have to write some comments, but should be good enough to start the discussion.
Test Plan: make check, will also run stress test
Reviewers: ljin, sdong, rven, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28353
Summary:
1. fix possible overflow of the two stats by using uint64_t
2. use a similar source of data to calculate RecordDrop. Previous one is not correct.
Test Plan: See outputs of db_bench settings, and the results look reasonable
Reviewers: MarkCallaghan, ljin, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: rven, leveldb, yhchiang, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28155
Summary:
Long awaited CompactionJob class! Move most compaction-related things from DBImpl to CompactionJob, making CompactionJob easier to test and understand.
Currently this is just replicating exactly the same functionality with as little as change as possible. As future work, we should:
1. Add CompactionJob tests (I think I'll do that tomorrow)
2. Reduce CompactionJob's state that it inherits from DBImpl
3. Figure out how to do yielding to flush better. Currently I implemented a callback as we agreed yesterday, but I don't think it's a good long term solution.
This reduces db_impl.cc from 5000+ LOC to 3400!
Test Plan: make check, will add CompactionJob-specific tests, probably also move some tests from db_test to compaction_job_test
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27957
Anurag Indu