Tag:
Branch:
Tree:
d6b9c4ae26
main
oxigraph-8.1.1
oxigraph-8.3.2
oxigraph-main
${ noResults }
11 Commits (d6b9c4ae26dfbb59eecbe27d85ada22b36dee44c)
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
yite.gu
|
a9117a3490 |
BackupEngine: we can return immediately if GetFileSize failed (#10176)
Summary: In some case, GetFileSize would be failure in copy_file_cb. If failure, we can return immediately, the subsequent code is meaningless, and add a log info let user know that problem happen here. Singed-off-by: Yite Gu <ess_gyt@qq.com> Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10176 Reviewed By: cbi42 Differential Revision: D37510888 Pulled By: ajkr fbshipit-source-id: 044ad8c45852fd19b8cd564b11f65d40c39e296f |
2 years ago |
|
Andrew Kryczka
|
ca81b80d83 |
Deflake RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam (#10271)
Summary: We saw flakes with the following failure: ``` [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1 utilities/backup/backup_engine_test.cc:2667: Failure Expected: (restore_time) > (0.8 * rate_limited_restore_time), actual: 48269 vs 60470.4 terminate called after throwing an instance of 'testing::internal::GoogleTestFailureException' what(): utilities/backup/backup_engine_test.cc:2667: Failure Expected: (restore_time) > (0.8 * rate_limited_restore_time), actual: 48269 vs 60470.4 Received signal 6 (Aborted) t/run-backup_engine_test-RateLimiting-BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting-1: line 4: 1032887 Aborted (core dumped) TEST_TMPDIR=$d ./backup_engine_test --gtest_filter=RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1 ``` Investigation revealed we forgot to use the mock time `SystemClock` for restore rate limiting. Then the test used wall clock time, which made the execution of "GenericRateLimiter::Request:PostTimedWait" non-deterministic as wall clock time might have advanced enough that waiting was not needed. This PR changes restore rate limiting to use mock time, which guarantees we always execute "GenericRateLimiter::Request:PostTimedWait". Then the assertions that rely on times recorded inside that callback should be robust. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10271 Test Plan: Applied the following patch which guaranteed repro before the fix. Verified the test passes after this PR even with that patch applied. ``` diff --git a/util/rate_limiter.cc b/util/rate_limiter.cc index f369e3220..6b3ed82fa 100644 --- a/util/rate_limiter.cc +++ b/util/rate_limiter.cc @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ void GenericRateLimiter::SetBytesPerSecond(int64_t bytes_per_second) { void GenericRateLimiter::Request(int64_t bytes, const Env::IOPriority pri, Statistics* stats) { + usleep(100000); assert(bytes <= refill_bytes_per_period_.load(std::memory_order_relaxed)); bytes = std::max(static_cast<int64_t>(0), bytes); TEST_SYNC_POINT("GenericRateLimiter::Request"); ``` Reviewed By: hx235 Differential Revision: D37499848 Pulled By: ajkr fbshipit-source-id: fd790d5a192996be8ba13b656751ccc7d8cb8f6e |
2 years ago |
|
Yanqin Jin
|
9586dcf1ce |
Expose the initial logger creation error (#10223)
Summary: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/9984 changes the behavior of RocksDB: if logger creation failed during `SanitizeOptions()`, `DB::Open()` will fail. However, since `SanitizeOptions()` is called in `DBImpl::DBImpl()`, we cannot directly expose the error to caller without some additional work. This is a first version proposal which: - Adds a new member `init_logger_creation_s` to `DBImpl` to store the result of init logger creation - Checks the error during `DB::Open()` and return it to caller if non-ok This is not very ideal. We can alternatively move the logger creation logic out of the `SanitizeOptions()`. Since `SanitizeOptions()` is used in other places, we need to check whether this change breaks anything in case other callers of `SanitizeOptions()` assumes that a logger should be created. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10223 Test Plan: make check Reviewed By: pdillinger Differential Revision: D37321717 Pulled By: riversand963 fbshipit-source-id: 58042358a86369d606549dd9938933dd47591c4b |
2 years ago |
|
Hui Xiao
|
a5d773e077 |
Add rate-limiting support to batched MultiGet() (#10159)
Summary: **Context/Summary:** https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9424 added rate-limiting support for user reads, which does not include batched `MultiGet()`s that call `RandomAccessFileReader::MultiRead()`. The reason is that it's harder (compared with RandomAccessFileReader::Read()) to implement the ideal rate-limiting where we first call `RateLimiter::RequestToken()` for allowed bytes to multi-read and then consume those bytes by satisfying as many requests in `MultiRead()` as possible. For example, it can be tricky to decide whether we want partially fulfilled requests within one `MultiRead()` or not. However, due to a recent urgent user request, we decide to pursue an elementary (but a conditionally ineffective) solution where we accumulate enough rate limiter requests toward the total bytes needed by one `MultiRead()` before doing that `MultiRead()`. This is not ideal when the total bytes are huge as we will actually consume a huge bandwidth from rate-limiter causing a burst on disk. This is not what we ultimately want with rate limiter. Therefore a follow-up work is noted through TODO comments. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10159 Test Plan: - Modified existing unit test `DBRateLimiterOnReadTest/DBRateLimiterOnReadTest.NewMultiGet` - Traced the underlying system calls `io_uring_enter` and verified they are 10 seconds apart from each other correctly under the setting of `strace -ftt -e trace=io_uring_enter ./db_bench -benchmarks=multireadrandom -db=/dev/shm/testdb2 -readonly -num=50 -threads=1 -multiread_batched=1 -batch_size=100 -duration=10 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=200 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=1000000 -rate_limit_bg_reads=1 -disable_auto_compactions=1 -rate_limit_user_ops=1` where each `MultiRead()` read about 2000 bytes (inspected by debugger) and the rate limiter grants 200 bytes per seconds. - Stress test: - Verified `./db_stress (-test_cf_consistency=1/test_batches_snapshots=1) -use_multiget=1 -cache_size=1048576 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10241024 -rate_limit_bg_reads=1 -rate_limit_user_ops=1` work Reviewed By: ajkr, anand1976 Differential Revision: D37135172 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 73b8e8f14761e5d4b77235dfe5d41f4eea968bcd |
2 years ago |
|
Yanqin Jin
|
514f0b0937 |
Fail DB::Open() if logger cannot be created (#9984)
Summary:
For regular db instance and secondary instance, we return error and refuse to open DB if Logger creation fails.
Our current code allows it, but it is really difficult to debug because
there will be no LOG files. The same for OPTIONS file, which will be explored in another PR.
Furthermore, Arena::AllocateAligned(size_t bytes, size_t huge_page_size, Logger* logger) has an
assertion as the following:
```cpp
#ifdef MAP_HUGETLB
if (huge_page_size > 0 && bytes > 0) {
assert(logger != nullptr);
}
#endif
```
It can be removed.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9984
Test Plan: make check
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D36347754
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: 529798c0511d2eaa2f0fd40cf7e61c4cbc6bc57e
|
3 years ago |
|
tagliavini
|
6c50082654 |
Remove code that only compiles for Visual Studio versions older than 2015 (#10065)
Summary: There are currently some preprocessor checks that assume support for Visual Studio versions older than 2015 (i.e., 0 < _MSC_VER < 1900), although we don't support them any more. We removed all code that only compiles on those older versions, except third-party/ files. The ROCKSDB_NOEXCEPT symbol is now obsolete, since it now always gets replaced by noexcept. We removed it. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10065 Reviewed By: pdillinger Differential Revision: D36721901 Pulled By: guidotag fbshipit-source-id: a2892d365ef53cce44a0a7d90dd6b72ee9b5e5f2 |
3 years ago |
|
Changyu Bi
|
8515bd50c9 |
Support read rate-limiting in SequentialFileReader (#9973)
Summary: Added rate limiter and read rate-limiting support to SequentialFileReader. I've updated call sites to SequentialFileReader::Read with appropriate IO priority (or left a TODO and specified IO_TOTAL for now). The PR is separated into four commits: the first one added the rate-limiting support, but with some fixes in the unit test since the number of request bytes from rate limiter in SequentialFileReader are not accurate (there is overcharge at EOF). The second commit fixed this by allowing SequentialFileReader to check file size and determine how many bytes are left in the file to read. The third commit added benchmark related code. The fourth commit moved the logic of using file size to avoid overcharging the rate limiter into backup engine (the main user of SequentialFileReader). Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9973 Test Plan: - `make check`, backup_engine_test covers usage of SequentialFileReader with rate limiter. - Run db_bench to check if rate limiting is throttling as expected: Verified that reads and writes are together throttled at 2MB/s, and at 0.2MB chunks that are 100ms apart. - Set up: `./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=/dev/shm/test_rocksdb` - Benchmark: ``` strace -ttfe read,write ./db_bench --benchmarks=backup -db=/dev/shm/test_rocksdb --backup_rate_limit=2097152 --use_existing_db strace -ttfe read,write ./db_bench --benchmarks=restore -db=/dev/shm/test_rocksdb --restore_rate_limit=2097152 --use_existing_db ``` - db bench on backup and restore to ensure no performance regression. - backup (avg over 50 runs): pre-change: 1.90443e+06 micros/op; post-change: 1.8993e+06 micros/op (improve by 0.2%) - restore (avg over 50 runs): pre-change: 1.79105e+06 micros/op; post-change: 1.78192e+06 micros/op (improve by 0.5%) ``` # Set up ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom -db=/tmp/test_rocksdb -num=10000000 # benchmark TEST_TMPDIR=/tmp/test_rocksdb NUM_RUN=50 for ((j=0;j<$NUM_RUN;j++)) do ./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -num=10000000 -benchmarks=backup -use_existing_db | egrep 'backup' # Restore #./db_bench -db=$TEST_TMPDIR -num=10000000 -benchmarks=restore -use_existing_db done > rate_limit.txt && awk -v NUM_RUN=$NUM_RUN '{sum+=$3;sum_sqrt+=$3^2}END{print sum/NUM_RUN, sqrt(sum_sqrt/NUM_RUN-(sum/NUM_RUN)^2)}' rate_limit.txt >> rate_limit_2.txt ``` Reviewed By: hx235 Differential Revision: D36327418 Pulled By: cbi42 fbshipit-source-id: e75d4307cff815945482df5ba630c1e88d064691 |
3 years ago |
|
Hui Xiao
|
e66e6d2faa |
Use SpecialEnv to speed up some slow BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam (#9974)
Summary: **Context:** `BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting` and `BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup` involve creating backup and restoring of a big database with rate-limiting. Using the normal env with a normal clock requires real elapse of time (13702 - 19848 ms/per test). As suggested in https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8722#discussion_r703698603, this PR is to speed it up with SpecialEnv (`time_elapse_only_sleep=true`) where its clock accepts fake elapse of time during rate-limiting (100 - 600 ms/per test) **Summary:** - Added TEST_ function to set clock of the default rate limiters in backup engine - Shrunk testdb by 10 times while keeping it big enough for testing - Renamed some test variables and reorganized some if-else branch for clarity without changing the test Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9974 Test Plan: - Run tests pre/post PR the same time to verify the tests are sped up by 90 - 95% `BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting` Pre: ``` [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/0 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/0 (11123 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1 (9441 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/2 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/2 (11096 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/3 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/3 (9339 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/4 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/4 (11121 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/5 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/5 (9413 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/6 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/6 (11185 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/7 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/7 (9511 ms) [----------] 8 tests from RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam (82230 ms total) ``` Post: ``` [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/0 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/0 (395 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1 (564 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/2 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/2 (358 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/3 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/3 (567 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/4 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/4 (173 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/5 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/5 (176 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/6 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/6 (191 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/7 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/7 (177 ms) [----------] 8 tests from RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam (2601 ms total) ``` `BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup` Pre: ``` [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/0 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/0 (7275 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/1 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/1 (3961 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/2 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/2 (7117 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/3 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/3 (3921 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/4 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/4 (19862 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/5 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/5 (10231 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/6 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/6 (19848 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/7 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/7 (10372 ms) [----------] 8 tests from RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam (82587 ms total) ``` Post: ``` [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/0 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/0 (157 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/1 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/1 (152 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/2 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/2 (160 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/3 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/3 (158 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/4 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/4 (155 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/5 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/5 (151 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/6 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/6 (146 ms) [ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/7 [ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/7 (153 ms) [----------] 8 tests from RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam (1232 ms total) ``` Reviewed By: pdillinger Differential Revision: D36336345 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 724c6ba745f95f56d4440a6d2f1e4512a2987589 |
3 years ago |
|
sdong
|
736a7b5433 |
Remove own ToString() (#9955)
Summary: ToString() is created as some platform doesn't support std::to_string(). However, we've already used std::to_string() by mistake for 16 months (in db/db_info_dumper.cc). This commit just remove ToString(). Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9955 Test Plan: Watch CI tests Reviewed By: riversand963 Differential Revision: D36176799 fbshipit-source-id: bdb6dcd0e3a3ab96a1ac810f5d0188f684064471 |
3 years ago |
|
sdong
|
49628c9a83 |
Use std::numeric_limits<> (#9954)
Summary: Right now we still don't fully use std::numeric_limits but use a macro, mainly for supporting VS 2013. Right now we only support VS 2017 and up so it is not a problem. The code comment claims that MinGW still needs it. We don't have a CI running MinGW so it's hard to validate. since we now require C++17, it's hard to imagine MinGW would still build RocksDB but doesn't support std::numeric_limits<>. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9954 Test Plan: See CI Runs. Reviewed By: riversand963 Differential Revision: D36173954 fbshipit-source-id: a35a73af17cdcae20e258cdef57fcf29a50b49e0 |
3 years ago |
|
Peter Dillinger
|
6534c6dea4 |
Fix remaining uses of "backupable" (#9792)
Summary: Various renaming and fixes to get rid of remaining uses of "backupable" which is terminology leftover from the original, flawed design of BackupableDB. Now any DB can be backed up, using BackupEngine. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9792 Test Plan: CI Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D35334386 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 2108a42b4575c8cccdfd791c549aae93ec2f3329 |
3 years ago |