Summary:
The individual commits in this PR should be self-explanatory.
All small and _very_ low-priority changes.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5896
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D18065108
Pulled By: mrambacher
fbshipit-source-id: 236b1a1d9d21f982cc08aa67027108dde5eaf280
Summary:
Range Locking - an implementation based on the locktree library
- Add a RangeTreeLockManager and RangeTreeLockTracker which implement
range locking using the locktree library.
- Point locks are handled as locks on single-point ranges.
- Add a unit test: range_locking_test
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7506
Reviewed By: akankshamahajan15
Differential Revision: D25320703
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: f86347384b42ba2b0257d67eca0f45f806b69da7
Summary:
When `ASSERT_STATUS_CHECKED` is enabled, `transaction_test` does not pass without this PR.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7572
Test Plan: `ASSERT_STATUS_CHECKED=1 make -j32 transaction_test && ./transaction_test`
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D24404319
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 13689035995366ab06d8eada3ea404e45fef8bc5
Summary:
In order to be able to introduce more locking protocols, we need to abstract out the locking subsystem in TransactionDB into a set of interfaces.
PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7013 introduces interface `LockTracker`. This PR is a follow up to take the first step to abstract out a `LockManager` interface.
Further modifications to the interface may be needed when introducing the first implementation of range lock. But the idea here is to put the range lock implementation based on range tree under the `utilities/transactions/lock/range/range_tree`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7532
Test Plan: point_lock_manager_test
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D24238731
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 2a9458cd8b3fb008d9529dbc4d3b28c24631f463
Summary:
We're going to support more locking protocols such as range lock in transaction.
However, in current design, `TransactionBase` has a member `tracked_keys` which assumes that point lock (lock a single key) is used, and is used in snapshot checking (isolation protocol). When using range lock, we may use read committed instead of snapshot checking as the isolation protocol.
The most significant usage scenarios of `tracked_keys` are:
1. pessimistic transaction uses it to track the locked keys, and unlock these keys when commit or rollback.
2. optimistic transaction does not lock keys upfront, it only tracks the lock intentions in tracked_keys, and do write conflict checking when commit.
3. each `SavePoint` tracks the keys that are locked since the `SavePoint`, `RollbackToSavePoint` or `PopSavePoint` relies on both the tracked keys in `SavePoint`s and `tracked_keys`.
Based on these scenarios, if we can abstract out a `LockTracker` interface to hold a set of tracked locks (can be keys or key ranges), and have methods that can be composed together to implement the scenarios, then `tracked_keys` can be an internal data structure of one implementation of `LockTracker`. See `utilities/transactions/lock/lock_tracker.h` for the detailed interface design, and `utilities/transactions/lock/point_lock_tracker.cc` for the implementation.
In the future, a `RangeLockTracker` can be implemented to track range locks without affecting other components.
After this PR, a clean interface for lock manager should be possible, and then ideally, we can have pluggable locking protocols.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7013
Test Plan: Run `transaction_test` and `optimistic_transaction_test`.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D22163706
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: f2860577b5334e31dd2994f5bc6d7c40d502b1b4
Summary:
When dynamically linking two binaries together, different builds of RocksDB from two sources might cause errors. To provide a tool for user to solve the problem, the RocksDB namespace is changed to a flag which can be overridden in build time.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6433
Test Plan: Build release, all and jtest. Try to build with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE with another flag.
Differential Revision: D19977691
fbshipit-source-id: aa7f2d0972e1c31d75339ac48478f34f6cfcfb3e
Summary:
**NOTE**: this also needs to be back-ported to 6.4.6 and possibly older branches if further releases from them is envisaged.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6081
Differential Revision: D18710107
Pulled By: zhichao-cao
fbshipit-source-id: 03260f9316566e2bfc12c7d702d6338bb7941e01
Summary:
Add savepoint support when the current transaction has flushed unprepared batches.
Rolling back to savepoint is similar to rolling back a transaction. It requires the set of keys that have changed since the savepoint, re-reading the keys at the snapshot at that savepoint, and the restoring the old keys by writing out another unprepared batch.
For this strategy to work though, we must be capable of reading keys at a savepoint. This does not work if keys were written out using the same sequence number before and after a savepoint. Therefore, when we flush out unprepared batches, we must split the batch by savepoint if any savepoints exist.
eg. If we have the following:
```
Put(A)
Put(B)
Put(C)
SetSavePoint()
Put(D)
Put(E)
SetSavePoint()
Put(F)
```
Then we will write out 3 separate unprepared batches:
```
Put(A) 1
Put(B) 1
Put(C) 1
Put(D) 2
Put(E) 2
Put(F) 3
```
This is so that when we rollback to eg. the first savepoint, we can just read keys at snapshot_seq = 1.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5627
Differential Revision: D16584130
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: 6d100dd548fb20c4b76661bd0f8a2647e64477fa
Summary:
Transaction::RollbackToSavePoint undos the modification made since the SavePoint beginning, and also unlocks the corresponding keys, which are tracked in the last SavePoint. Currently ::PopSavePoint simply discard these tracked keys, leaving them locked in the lock manager. This breaks a subsequent ::RollbackToSavePoint behavior as it loses track of such keys, and thus cannot unlock them. The patch fixes ::PopSavePoint by passing on the track key information to the previous SavePoint.
Fixes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/5618
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5628
Differential Revision: D16505325
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: 2bc3b30963ab4d36d996d1f66543c93abf358980
Summary:
Currently, we are tracking keys we need to rollback via a separate structure specific to WriteUnprepared in write_set_keys_.
We already have a data structure called tracked_keys_ used to track which keys to unlock on transaction termination. This is exactly what we want, since we should only rollback keys that we have locked anyway.
Save some memory by reusing that data structure instead of making our own.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5562
Differential Revision: D16206484
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: 5894d2b824a4b19062d84adbd6e6e86f00047488
Summary:
MultiGet batching was implemented in #5011 in order to reduce CPU utilization when looking up multiple keys at once. This PR implements corresponding ```MultiGet``` and ```MultiGetSingleCFForUpdate``` in ```rocksdb::Transaction``` that call the underlying batching implementation.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5210
Differential Revision: D15048164
Pulled By: anand1976
fbshipit-source-id: c52f6043102ab0cbc723f4cba2a7b7d1767f6f52
Summary:
Savepoints are assumed to be used in a stack-wise fashion (only
the top element should be used), so they were stored by `WriteBatch`
in a member variable `save_points` using an std::stack.
Conceptually this is fine, but the implementation had a few issues:
- the `save_points_` instance variable was a plain pointer to a heap-
allocated `SavePoints` struct. The destructor of `WriteBatch` simply
deletes this pointer. However, the copy constructor of WriteBatch
just copied that pointer, meaning that copying a WriteBatch with
active savepoints will very likely have crashed before. Now a proper
copy of the savepoints is made in the copy constructor, and not just
a copy of the pointer
- `save_points_` was an std::stack, which defaults to `std::deque` for
the underlying container. A deque is a bit over the top here, as we
only need access to the most recent savepoint (i.e. stack.top()) but
never any elements at the front. std::deque is rather expensive to
initialize in common environments. For example, the STL implementation
shipped with GNU g++ will perform a heap allocation of more than 500
bytes to create an empty deque object. Although the `save_points_`
container is created lazily by RocksDB, moving from a deque to a plain
`std::vector` is much more memory-efficient. So `save_points_` is now
a vector.
- `save_points_` was changed from a plain pointer to an `std::unique_ptr`,
making ownership more explicit.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5192
Differential Revision: D15024074
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 5b128786d3789cde94e46465c9e91badd07a25d7
Summary:
Transaction::GetForUpdate is extended with a do_validate parameter with default value of true. If false it skips validating the snapshot (if there is any) before doing the read. After the read it also returns the latest value (expects the ReadOptions::snapshot to be nullptr). This allows RocksDB applications to use GetForUpdate similarly to how InnoDB does. Similarly ::Merge, ::Put, ::Delete, and ::SingleDelete are extended with assume_exclusive_tracked with default value of false. It true it indicates that call is assumed to be after a ::GetForUpdate(do_validate=false).
The Java APIs are accordingly updated.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4680
Differential Revision: D13068508
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: f0b59db28f7f6a078b60844d902057140765e67d
Summary:
Transaction has had methods to deal with SavePoints already, but
was missing the PopSavePoint method provided by WriteBatch and
WriteBatchWithIndex.
This PR adds PopSavePoint to Transaction as well. Having the method
on Transaction-level too is useful for applications that repeatedly
execute a sequence of operations that normally succeed, but infrequently
need to get rolled back. Using SavePoints here is sensible, but as
operations normally succeed the application may pile up a lot of
useless SavePoints inside a Transaction, leading to slightly increased
memory usage for managing the unneeded SavePoints.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4256
Differential Revision: D9326932
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 53a0af18a6c7e87feff8a56f1f3eab9df7f371d6
Summary:
The is an optimization to reduce lookup in the CommitCache when querying IsInSnapshot. The optimization takes the smallest uncommitted data at the time that the snapshot was taken and if the sequence number of the read data is lower than that number it assumes the data as committed.
To implement this optimization two changes are required: i) The AddPrepared function must be called sequentially to avoid out of order insertion in the PrepareHeap (otherwise the top of the heap does not indicate the smallest prepare in future too), ii) non-2PC transactions also call AddPrepared if they do not commit in one step.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3649
Differential Revision: D7388630
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: b79506238c17467d590763582960d4d90181c600
Summary:
This patch takes advantage of memtable being able to detect duplicate <key,seq> and returning TryAgain to handle duplicate keys in WritePrepared Txns. Through WriteBatchWithIndex's index it detects existence of at least a duplicate key in the write batch. If duplicate key was reported, it then pays the cost of counting the number of sub-patches by iterating over the write batch and pass it to DBImpl::Write. DB will make use of the provided batch_count to assign proper sequence numbers before sending them to the WAL. When later inserting the batch to the memtable, it increases the seq each time memtbale reports a duplicate (a sub-patch in our counting) and tries again.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3455
Differential Revision: D6873699
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: db8487526c3a5dc1ddda0ea49f0f979b26ae648d
Summary:
This patch clarifies and refactors the logic around tracked keys in transactions.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3140
Differential Revision: D6290258
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 03b50646264cbcc550813c060b180fc7451a55c1
Summary:
GetCommitTimeWriteBatch is currently used to store some state as part of commit in 2PC. In MyRocks it is specifically used to store some data that would be needed only during recovery. So it is not need to be stored in memtable right after each commit.
This patch enables an optimization to write the GetCommitTimeWriteBatch only to the WAL. The batch will be written to memtable during recovery when the WAL is replayed. To cover the case when WAL is deleted after memtable flush, the batch is also buffered and written to memtable right before each memtable flush.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3071
Differential Revision: D6148023
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 2d09bae5565abe2017c0327421010d5c0d55eaa7
Summary:
Looks like the API is simply missing. Adding it.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2937
Differential Revision: D5919955
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 6e2e9c96c29882b0bb4113d1f8efb72bffc57878
Summary:
The ::Get from DB is not augmented with an overload method that takes a PinnableSlice instead of a string. Transactions however are not yet upgraded to use the new API. As a result, transaction users such as MyRocks cannot benefit from it. This patch updates the transactional API with a PinnableSlice overload.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2736
Differential Revision: D5645770
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: f6af520df902f842de1bcf99bed3e8dfc43ad96d
Summary:
This reverts the previous commit 1d7048c598, which broke the build.
Did a `git revert 1d7048c`.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2627
Differential Revision: D5476473
Pulled By: sagar0
fbshipit-source-id: 4756ff5c0dfc88c17eceb00e02c36176de728d06
Summary: This uses `clang-tidy` to comment out unused parameters (in functions, methods and lambdas) in fbcode. Cases that the tool failed to handle are fixed manually.
Reviewed By: igorsugak
Differential Revision: D5454343
fbshipit-source-id: 5dee339b4334e25e963891b519a5aa81fbf627b2
Summary:
Upgrading a shared lock was silently succeeding because the actual locking code was skipped. This is because if the keys are tracked, it is assumed that they are already locked and do not require locking. Fix this by recording in tracked keys whether the key was locked exclusively or not.
Note that lock downgrades are impossible, which is the behaviour we expect.
This fixesfacebook/mysql-5.6#587.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2122
Differential Revision: D4861489
Pulled By: IslamAbdelRahman
fbshipit-source-id: 58c7ebe7af098bf01b9774b666d3e9867747d8fd
Summary:
Extend TransactionOptions to include max_write_batch_size which determines the maximum size of the writebatch representation. If memory limit is exceeded, the operation will abort with subcode kMemoryLimit.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2124
Differential Revision: D4861842
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: 46fd172ea67cc90bbba829bf0d70cfab2261c161
Summary:
This is an implementation of non-exclusive locks for pessimistic transactions. It is relatively simple and does not prevent starvation (ie. it's possible that request for exclusive access will never be granted if there are always threads holding shared access). It is done by changing `KeyLockInfo` to hold an set a transaction ids, instead of just one, and adding a flag specifying whether this lock is currently held with exclusive access or not.
Some implementation notes:
- Some lock diagnostic functions had to be updated to return a set of transaction ids for a given lock, eg. `GetWaitingTxn` and `GetLockStatusData`.
- Deadlock detection is a bit more complicated since a transaction can now wait on multiple other transactions. A BFS is done in this case, and deadlock detection depth is now just a limit on the number of transactions we visit.
- Expirable transactions do not work efficiently with shared locks at the moment, but that's okay for now.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1573
Differential Revision: D4239097
Pulled By: lth
fbshipit-source-id: da7c074
Summary: Previously, reusing a transaction (by passing it as an argument to BeginTransaction) would not clear the transaction's snapshot. This is not a clear, well-definited behavior.
Test Plan: improved test
Reviewers: sdong, IslamAbdelRahman, horuff, jkedgar
Reviewed By: jkedgar
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D55053
Summary: Add function to reinitialize a transaction object so that it can be reused. This is an optimization so users can potentially avoid reallocating transaction objects.
Test Plan: added tests
Reviewers: yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: jkedgar, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D53835
Summary: MyRocks wants to be able to un-lock a key that was just locked by GetForUpdate(). To do this safely, I am now keeping track of the number of reads(for update) and writes for each key in a transaction. UndoGetForUpdate() will only unlock a key if it hasn't been written and the read count reaches 0.
Test Plan: more unit tests
Reviewers: igor, rven, yhchiang, spetrunia, sdong
Reviewed By: spetrunia, sdong
Subscribers: spetrunia, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D47043
Summary: Add support to change write options after creating a transaction. This is needed for MongoRocks.
Test Plan: added test
Reviewers: sdong, rven, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D51867
Summary: When SetSnapshot() is used the caller immediately knows a snapshot has been created, but when SetSnapshotOnNextOperation() is used the caller needs a way to get notified when that snapshot has been generated. This creates an interface that the client can implement that will be called at the time the snapshot is created.
Test Plan: Added a new SetSnapshotOnNextOperationWithNotification test into the transaction_test.
Reviewers: sdong, anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: yoshinorim, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D51177
Summary:
MyRocks needs the ability to clear a snapshot for Read Committed support
Test Plan: transaction_test
Reviewers: anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48861
Summary: Support for Transaction::CreateSnapshotOnNextOperation(). This is to fix a write-conflict race-condition that Yoshinori was running into when testing MyRocks with LinkBench.
Test Plan: New tests
Reviewers: yhchiang, spetrunia, rven, igor, yoshinorim, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48099
Summary:
MyRocks reported some perfomance issues when inserting many keys into a transaction due to the cost of inserting new keys into WriteBatchWithIndex. Frequently, they don't even need the keys to be indexed as they don't need to read them back. DisableIndexing() can be used to avoid the cost of indexing.
I also plan on eventually investigating if we can improve WriteBatchWithIndex performance. But even if we improved the perf here, it is still beneficial to be able to disable the indexing all together for large transactions.
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: igor, rven, yoshinorim, spetrunia, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48471
Summary: Transactional SingleDelete is needed for MyRocks. Note: This diff requires D47529.
Test Plan: Added some new tests in this diff as well as more tests added in D47529
Reviewers: rven, sdong, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: yoshinorim, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D47535
Summary: Transaction::RollbackToSavePoint() will now release any locks that were taken since the previous SavePoint. To do this cleanly, I moved tracked_keys_ management into TransactionBase.
Test Plan: New Transaction test.
Reviewers: igor, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, spetrunia, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D46761
Summary: Added funtions to fetch the number of locked keys in a transaction, the number of pending puts/merge/deletes, and the elapsed time
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewers: yoshinorim, jkedgar, rven, sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D45417
Summary: MyRocks wants to be able to change the lock timeout of a transaction that has already started. Expose existing SetLockTimeout function to users.
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: spetrunia, rven, sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D45987
Summary:
As I keep adding new features to transactions, I keep creating more duplicate code. This diff cleans this up by creating a base implementation class for Transaction and OptimisticTransaction to inherit from.
The code in TransactionBase.h/.cc is all just copied from elsewhere. The only entertaining part of this class worth looking at is the virtual TryLock method which allows OptimisticTransactions and Transactions to share the same common code for Put/Get/etc.
The rest of this diff is mostly red and easy on the eyes.
Test Plan: No functionality change. existing tests pass.
Reviewers: sdong, jkedgar, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D45135
Summary:
Clean up transactions to use the new RollbackToSavePoint api in WriteBatchWithIndex.
Note, this diff depends on Pessimistic Transactions diff and ManagedSnapshot diff (D40869 and D43293).
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, spetrunia, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43371
Summary:
Initial implementation of Pessimistic Transactions. This diff contains the api changes discussed in D38913. This diff is pretty large, so let me know if people would prefer to meet up to discuss it.
MyRocks folks: please take a look at the API in include/rocksdb/utilities/transaction[_db].h and let me know if you have any issues.
Also, you'll notice a couple of TODOs in the implementation of RollbackToSavePoint(). After chatting with Siying, I'm going to send out a separate diff for an alternate implementation of this feature that implements the rollback inside of WriteBatch/WriteBatchWithIndex. We can then decide which route is preferable.
Next, I'm planning on doing some perf testing and then integrating this diff into MongoRocks for further testing.
Test Plan: Unit tests, db_bench parallel testing.
Reviewers: igor, rven, sdong, yhchiang, yoshinorim
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: hermanlee4, maykov, spetrunia, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40869
jsteemann