Summary:
* PartialMerge api now takes a list of operands instead of two operands.
* Add min_pertial_merge_operands to Options, indicating the minimum
number of operands to trigger partial merge.
* This diff is based on Schalk's previous diff (D14601), but it also
includes necessary changes such as updating the pure C api for
partial merge.
Test Plan:
* make check all
* develop tests for cases where partial merge takes more than two
operands.
TODOs (from Schalk):
* Add test with min_partial_merge_operands > 2.
* Perform benchmarks to measure the performance improvements (can probably
use results of task #2837810.)
* Add description of problem to doc/index.html.
* Change wiki pages to reflect the interface changes.
Reviewers: haobo, igor, vamsi
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16815
Summary:
Added an option (max_successive_merges) that can be used to specify the
maximum number of successive merge operations on a key in the memtable.
This can be used to improve performance of the "get" operation. If many
successive merge operations are performed on a key, the performance of "get"
operations on the key deteriorates, as the value has to be computed for each
"get" operation by applying all the successive merge operations.
FB Task ID: #3428853
Test Plan:
make all check
db_bench --benchmarks=readrandommergerandom
counter_stress_test
Reviewers: haobo, vamsi, dhruba, sdong
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: zshao
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14991
Summary:
Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb. This allows a single
application to link in open-source leveldb code as well as
rocksdb code into the same process.
Test Plan: compile rocksdb
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13287
Summary: Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.
Test Plan:
make clean; make check
make clean; make release
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12489
Test Plan:
- make all check;
- make release;
- make stringappend_test; ./stringappend_test
Reviewers: haobo, emayanke
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, kailiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12381
Summary: rocksdb replicaiton will need this when writing value+TS from master to slave 'as is'
Test Plan: make
Reviewers: dhruba, vamsi, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11919
Summary: Implemented a TtlMergeOperator class which inherits from MergeOperator and is TTL aware. It strips out timestamp from existing_value and attaches timestamp to new_value, calling user-provided-Merge in between.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11775
Summary: Currently, merge_test uses /tmp/testdb for the test database. It should really use something more specific to merge_test. Most of the other tests use test::TmpDir() + "/<test name>db". This patch implements such behavior for merge_test; it makes merge_test use test::TmpDir() + "/merge_testdb"
Test Plan:
make clean
make -j32 merge_test
./merge_test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11877
Summary:
This diff introduces a new Merge operation into rocksdb.
The purpose of this review is mostly getting feedback from the team (everyone please) on the design.
Please focus on the four files under include/leveldb/, as they spell the client visible interface change.
include/leveldb/db.h
include/leveldb/merge_operator.h
include/leveldb/options.h
include/leveldb/write_batch.h
Please go over local/my_test.cc carefully, as it is a concerete use case.
Please also review the impelmentation files to see if the straw man implementation makes sense.
Note that, the diff does pass all make check and truly supports forward iterator over db and a version
of Get that's based on iterator.
Future work:
- Integration with compaction
- A raw Get implementation
I am working on a wiki that explains the design and implementation choices, but coding comes
just naturally and I think it might be a good idea to share the code earlier. The code is
heavily commented.
Test Plan: run all local tests
Reviewers: dhruba, heyongqiang
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, zshao, sheki, emayanke, MarkCallaghan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9651
Yueh-Hsuan Chiang