Summary:
This PR does the following:
-> Creates a WinFileSystem class. This class is the Windows equivalent of the PosixFileSystem and will be used on Windows systems.
-> Introduces a CustomEnv class. A CustomEnv is an Env that takes a FileSystem as constructor argument. I believe there will only ever be two implementations of this class (PosixEnv and WinEnv). There is still a CustomEnvWrapper class that takes an Env and a FileSystem and wraps the Env calls with the input Env but uses the FileSystem for the FileSystem calls
-> Eliminates the public uses of the LegacyFileSystemWrapper.
With this change in place, there are effectively the following patterns of Env:
- "Base Env classes" (PosixEnv, WinEnv). These classes implement the core Env functions (e.g. Threads) and have a hard-coded input FileSystem. These classes inherit from CompositeEnv, implement the core Env functions (threads) and delegate the FileSystem-like calls to the input file system.
- Wrapped Composite Env classes (MemEnv). These classes take in an Env and a FileSystem. The core env functions are re-directed to the wrapped env. The file system calls are redirected to the input file system
- Legacy Wrapped Env classes. These classes take in an Env input (but no FileSystem). The core env functions are re-directed to the wrapped env. A "Legacy File System" is created using this env and the file system calls directed to the env itself.
With these changes in place, the PosixEnv becomes a singleton -- there is only ever one created. Any other use of the PosixEnv is via another wrapped env. This cleans up some of the issues with the env construction and destruction.
Additionally, there were places in the code that required had an Env when they required a FileSystem. Many of these places would wrap the Env with a LegacyFileSystemWrapper instead of using the env->GetFileSystem(). These places were changed, thereby removing layers of additional redirection (LegacyFileSystem --> Env --> Env::FileSystem).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7703
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D25762190
Pulled By: anand1976
fbshipit-source-id: 1a088e97fc916f28ac69c149cd1dcad0ab31704b
Summary:
This PR does a few things:
1. The MockFileSystem class was split out from the MockEnv. This change would theoretically allow a MockFileSystem to be used by other Environments as well (if we created a means of constructing one). The MockFileSystem implements a FileSystem in its entirety and does not rely on any Wrapper implementation.
2. Make the RocksDB test suite work when MOCK_ENV=1 and ENCRYPTED_ENV=1 are set. To accomplish this, a few things were needed:
- The tests that tried to use the "wrong" environment (Env::Default() instead of env_) were updated
- The MockFileSystem was changed to support the features it was missing or mishandled (such as recursively deleting files in a directory or supporting renaming of a directory).
3. Updated the test framework to have a ROCKSDB_GTEST_SKIP macro. This can be used to flag tests that are skipped. Currently, this defaults to doing nothing (marks the test as SUCCESS) but will mark the tests as SKIPPED when RocksDB is upgraded to a version of gtest that supports this (gtest-1.10).
I have run a full "make check" with MEM_ENV, ENCRYPTED_ENV, both, and neither under both MacOS and RedHat. A few tests were disabled/skipped for the MEM/ENCRYPTED cases. The error_handler_fs_test fails/hangs for MEM_ENV (presumably a timing problem) and I will introduce another PR/issue to track that problem. (I will also push a change to disable those tests soon). There is one more test in DBTest2 that also fails which I need to investigate or skip before this PR is merged.
Theoretically, this PR should also allow the test suite to run against an Env loaded from the registry, though I do not have one to try it with currently.
Finally, once this is accepted, it would be nice if there was a CircleCI job to run these tests on a checkin so this effort does not become stale. I do not know how to do that, so if someone could write that job, it would be appreciated :)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7566
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D24408980
Pulled By: jay-zhuang
fbshipit-source-id: 911b1554a4d0da06fd51feca0c090a4abdcb4a5f
Summary:
A new file interface `SupportPrefetch()` is added. When the user overrides it to `false`, an internal prefetch buffer will be used for readahead. Useful for non-directIO but FS doesn't have readahead support.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7312
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D23329847
Pulled By: jay-zhuang
fbshipit-source-id: 71cd4ce6f4a820840294e4e6aec111ab76175527
mrambacher