Summary:
This PR adds support for building on s390x including updating travis CI. It uses the previous work in https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6168 and adds some more changes to get all current tests (make check and jni tests) to pass. The tests were run with snappy, lz4, bzip2 and zstd all compiled in.
There are a few pieces still needed to get the travis build working that I don't think I can do. adamretter is this something you could help with?
1. A prebuilt https://rocksdb-deps.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/cmake/cmake-3.14.5-Linux-s390x.deb package
2. A https://hub.docker.com/r/evolvedbinary/rocksjava s390x image
Not sure if there is more required for travis. Happy to help in any way I can.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8962
Reviewed By: mrambacher
Differential Revision: D31802198
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 683511466fa6b505f85ba5a9964a268c6151f0c2
Summary:
- Added Type/CreateFromString
- Added ability to load EventListeners to DBOptions
- Since EventListeners did not previously have a Name(), defaulted to "". If there is no name, the listener cannot be loaded from the ObjectRegistry.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8473
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D29901488
Pulled By: mrambacher
fbshipit-source-id: 2d3a4aa6db1562ac03e7ad41b360e3521d486254
Summary:
Fix this scenario:
trx1> acquire shared lock on $key
trx2> acquire shared lock on the same $key
trx1> attempt to acquire a unique lock on $key.
Lock acquisition will fail, and deadlock detection will start.
It will call iterate_and_get_overlapping_row_locks() which will
produce a list with two locks (shared locks by trx1 and trx2).
However the code in lock_request::build_wait_graph() was not prepared
to find the lock by the same transaction in the list of conflicting
locks. Fix it to ignore it.
(One may suggest to fix iterate_and_get_overlapping_row_locks() to not
include locks by trx1. This is not a good idea, because that function
is also used to report all locks currently held)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7938
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D26529374
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: d89cbed008db1a97a8f2351b9bfb75310750d16a
Summary:
BasicLockEscalation will cause false-positive warnings under TSAN (this is a known issue in TSAN, see details in https://gist.github.com/spetrunia/77274cf2d5848e0a7e090d622695ed4e), skip this test if TSAN is enabled, or if we are not sure whether TSAN is enabled.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7814
Test Plan: watch the tsan contrun test to pass.
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D25708094
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 4fc813ff373301d033d086154cc7bb60a5e95889
Summary:
Range Locking - an implementation based on the locktree library
- Add a RangeTreeLockManager and RangeTreeLockTracker which implement
range locking using the locktree library.
- Point locks are handled as locks on single-point ranges.
- Add a unit test: range_locking_test
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7506
Reviewed By: akankshamahajan15
Differential Revision: D25320703
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: f86347384b42ba2b0257d67eca0f45f806b69da7
Summary:
This disables Linux/amd64 builds in Travis for PRs, and adds a
gcc-10+c++20 build in CircleCI, which should fill out sufficient coverage
vs. what we had in Travis
Fixed a use of std::is_pod, which is deprecated in c++20
Fixed ++ on a volatile in db_repl_stress.cc, with bigger refactoring.
Although ++ on this volatile was probably ok with one thread writer and
one thread reader, the code was still overly complex. There was a
deadcode check for error
`if (replThread.no_read < dataPump.no_records)` which can be proven
never to happen based on the structure of the code. It infinite loops
instead for the case intended to be checked. I just simplified the code
for what should be the same checking power.
Also most configurations seem to be using make parallelism = 2 * vcores,
so fixing / using that.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7791
Test Plan:
CI
and `while ./db_repl_stress; do echo again; done` for a while
Reviewed By: siying
Differential Revision: D25669834
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: b2c688053d0b1d52c989903449d3cd27a04130d6
Summary:
To be used for implementing Range Locking.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7753
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D25378980
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 801a9c5cd92a84654ca2586b73e8f69001e89320
Summary:
This PR has two commits:
1. Modify the code to allow different Lock Managers (of any kind) to be used. It is implied that a LockManager uses its own custom LockTracker.
2. Add definitions for Range Locking (class Endpoint and GetRangeLock() function.
cheng-chang, is this what you've had in mind (should the PR have both item 1 and item 2?)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7443
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D24123172
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: c6548ad6d4cc3c25f68d13b29147bc6fdf357185
Summary:
In order to be able to introduce more locking protocols, we need to abstract out the locking subsystem in TransactionDB into a set of interfaces.
PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7013 introduces interface `LockTracker`. This PR is a follow up to take the first step to abstract out a `LockManager` interface.
Further modifications to the interface may be needed when introducing the first implementation of range lock. But the idea here is to put the range lock implementation based on range tree under the `utilities/transactions/lock/range/range_tree`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7532
Test Plan: point_lock_manager_test
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D24238731
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: 2a9458cd8b3fb008d9529dbc4d3b28c24631f463
Jonathan Albrecht