Summary:
Transaction Log Iterator did not move to the next file in the series if there was a write batch at the end of the currentFile.
The solution is if the last seq no. of the current file is < RequestedSeqNo. Assume the first seqNo. of the next file has to satisfy the request.
Also major refactoring around the code. Moved opening the logreader to a seperate function, got rid of goto.
Test Plan: added a unit test for it.
Reviewers: dhruba, heyongqiang
Reviewed By: heyongqiang
CC: leveldb, emayanke
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D10029
Summary:
The unit test fails as our solution does not work with MMap'd files.
Disable the failing unit test. Put it back with the next diff which should fix the problem.
Test Plan: db_test
Reviewers: heyongqiang
CC: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9645
Summary:
* Add a method to check if the log reader is at EOF.
* If we know a record has been flushed force the log_reader to believe it is not at EOF, using a new method UnMarkEof().
This does not work with MMpaed files.
Test Plan: added a unit test.
Reviewers: dhruba, heyongqiang
Reviewed By: heyongqiang
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9567
Summary:
This patch allows an application to specify whether to use bufferedio,
reads-via-mmaps and writes-via-mmaps per database. Earlier, there
was a global static variable that was used to configure this functionality.
The default setting remains the same (and is backward compatible):
1. use bufferedio
2. do not use mmaps for reads
3. use mmap for writes
4. use readaheads for reads needed for compaction
I also added a parameter to db_bench to be able to explicitly specify
whether to do readaheads for compactions or not.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: sheki, heyongqiang, MarkCallaghan
Reviewed By: sheki
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9429
Summary:
Store the last flushed, seq no. in db_impl. Check against it in
transaction Log iterator. Do not attempt to read ahead if we do not know
if the data is flushed completely.
Does not work if flush is disabled. Any ideas on fixing that?
* Minor change, iter->Next is called the first time automatically for
* the first time.
Test Plan:
existing test pass.
More ideas on testing this?
Planning to run some stress test.
Reviewers: dhruba, heyongqiang
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9087
Summary:
Replace manual memory management with std::unique_ptr in a
number of places; not exhaustive, but this fixes a few leaks with file
handles as well as clarifies semantics of the ownership of file handles
with log classes.
Test Plan: db_stress, make check
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: zshao, leveldb, heyongqiang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8043
Summary:
1. The OpenForReadOnly() call should not lock the db. This is useful
so that multiple processes can open the same database concurrently
for reading.
2. GetUpdatesSince should not error out if the archive directory
does not exist.
3. A new constructor for WriteBatch that can takes a serialized
string as a parameter of the constructor.
Test Plan: make clean check
Reviewers: sheki
Reviewed By: sheki
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D7449
Summary:
WriteBatch is now used by the GetUpdatesSinceAPI. This API is external
and will be used by the rocks server. Rocks Server and others will need
to know about the Sequence Number in the WriteBatch. This public method
will allow for that.
Test Plan: make all check.
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D7293
Summary:
How it works:
* GetUpdatesSince takes a SequenceNumber.
* A LogFile with the first SequenceNumber nearest and lesser than the requested Sequence Number is found.
* Seek in the logFile till the requested SeqNumber is found.
* Return an iterator which contains logic to return record's one by one.
Test Plan:
* Test case included to check the good code path.
* Will update with more test-cases.
* Feedback required on test-cases.
Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D7119
Abhishek Kona