Summary:
It is confusing to have auto_roll_logger to stay under db/, which has nothing to do with database. Move filename together as it is a dependency.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2080
Differential Revision: D4821141
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: ca7d768
Summary:
reland https://reviews.facebook.net/D62523
- Update SstFileWriter to include a property for a global sequence number in the SST file `rocksdb.external_sst_file.global_seqno`
- Update TableProperties to be aware of the offset of each property in the file
- Update BlockBasedTableReader and Block to be able to honor the sequence number in `rocksdb.external_sst_file.global_seqno` property and use it to overwrite all sequence number in the file
Something worth mentioning is that we don't update the seqno in the index block since and when doing a binary search, the reason for that is that it's guaranteed that SST files with global seqno will have only one user_key and each key will have seqno=0 encoded in it, This mean that this key is greater than any other key with seqno> 0. That mean that we can actually keep the current logic for these blocks
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D65211
Summary:
- Update SstFileWriter to include a property for a global sequence number in the SST file `rocksdb.external_sst_file.global_seqno`
- Update TableProperties to be aware of the offset of each property in the file
- Update BlockBasedTableReader and Block to be able to honor the sequence number in `rocksdb.external_sst_file.global_seqno` property and use it to overwrite all sequence number in the file
Something worth mentioning is that we don't update the seqno in the index block since and when doing a binary search, the reason for that is that it's guaranteed that SST files with global seqno will have only one user_key and each key will have seqno=0 encoded in it, This mean that this key is greater than any other key with seqno> 0. That mean that we can actually keep the current logic for these blocks
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewers: andrewkr, yhchiang, yiwu, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: hcz, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D62523
Summary: There's no reference to ImmutableCFOptions elsewhere in /include/rocksdb. ImmutableCFOptions was introduced in this commit (5665e5e285) but later its reference in /include/rocksdb/table.h is removed.
Test Plan:
make all check
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: yhchiang, andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D63177
Summary:
This is a proof of concept of a RocksDB blob log file. The actual value of the Put() is appended to a blob log using normal data block format, and the handle of the block is written as the value of the key in RocksDB.
The prototype only supports Put() and Get(). It doesn't support DB restart, garbage collection, Write() call, iterator, snapshots, etc.
Test Plan: Add unit tests.
Reviewers: arahut
Reviewed By: arahut
Subscribers: kradhakrishnan, leveldb, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D61485
Siying Dong