Summary:
This is to simplify rocksdb public APIs and improve the code quality.
Created an additional parameter to ParseFileName for log sub type and improved the code for deleting a wal file.
Wrote exhaustive unit-tests in delete_file_test
Unification of other redundant APIs can be taken up in a separate diff
Test Plan: Expanded delete_file test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13647
Summary:
Create a new type of file on startup if it doesn't already exist called DBID.
This will store a unique number generated from boost library's uuid header file.
The use-case is to identify the case of a db losing all its data and coming back up either empty or from an image(backup/live replica's recovery)
the key point to note is that DBID is not stored in a backup or db snapshot
It's preferable to use Boost for uuid because:
1) A non-standard way of generating uuid is not good
2) /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid generates a uuid but only on linux environments and the solution would not be clean
3) c++ doesn't have any direct way to get a uuid
4) Boost is a very good library that was already having linkage in rocksdb from third-party
Note: I had to update the TOOLCHAIN_REV in build files to get latest verison of boost from third-party as the older version had a bug.
I had to put Wno-uninitialized in Makefile because boost-1.51 has an unitialized variable and rocksdb would not comiple otherwise. Latet open-source for boost is 1.54 but is not there in third-party. I have notified the concerned people in fbcode about it.
@kailiu : While releasing to third-party, an additional dependency will need to be created for boost in TARGETS file. I can help identify.
Test Plan:
Expand db_test to test 2 cases
1) Restarting db with Id file present - verify that no change to Id
2)Restarting db with Id file deleted - verify that a different Id is there after reopen
Also run make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13587
Summary: When I debug the unit test failures when enabling background flush thread, I feel the function names can be made clearer for people to understand. Also, if the names are fixed, in many places, some tests' bugs are obvious (and some of those tests are failing). This patch is to clean it up for future maintenance.
Test Plan: Run test suites.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, xjin
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13431
Summary:
Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb. This allows a single
application to link in open-source leveldb code as well as
rocksdb code into the same process.
Test Plan: compile rocksdb
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13287
Summary: db->DeleteFile calls ParseFileName to check name that was returned for sst file. Now, sst filename is returned using TableFileName which uses MakeFileName. This puts a / at the front of the name and ParseFileName doesn't like that. Changed ParseFileName to tolerate /s at the beginning. The test delet_file_test used to pass earlier because this behaviour of MakeFileName had been changed a while back to not return a / during which delete_file_test was checked in. But MakeFileName had to be reverted to add / at the front because GetLiveFiles used at many places outside rocksdb used the previous behaviour of MakeFileName.
Test Plan: make;./delete_filetest;make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, vamsi
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12663
Summary: Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.
Test Plan:
make clean; make check
make clean; make release
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12489
Summary: An api to query the level, key ranges, size etc for each SST file and an api to delete a specific file from the db and all associated state in the bookkeeping datastructures.
Notes: Editing the manifest version does not release the obsolete files right away. However deleting the file directly will mess up the iterator. We may need a more aggressive/timely file deletion api.
I have used std::unique_ptr - will switch to boost:: since this is external. thoughts?
Unit test is fragile right now as it expects the compaction at certain levels.
Test Plan: unittest
Reviewers: dhruba, vamsi, emayanke
CC: zshao, leveldb, haobo
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Mayank Agarwal