Block cache tracing: Fix minor bugs with downsampling and some benchmark results. (#5473)
Summary:
As the code changes for block cache tracing are almost complete, I did a benchmark to compare the performance when block cache tracing is enabled/disabled.
With 1% downsampling ratio, the performance overhead of block cache tracing is negligible. When we trace all block accesses, the throughput drops by 6 folds with 16 threads issuing random reads and all reads are served in block cache.
Setup:
RocksDB: version 6.2
Date: Mon Jun 17 17:11:13 2019
CPU: 24 * Intel Core Processor (Skylake)
CPUCache: 16384 KB
Keys: 20 bytes each
Values: 100 bytes each (100 bytes after compression)
Entries: 10000000
Prefix: 20 bytes
Keys per prefix: 0
RawSize: 1144.4 MB (estimated)
FileSize: 1144.4 MB (estimated)
Write rate: 0 bytes/second
Read rate: 0 ops/second
Compression: NoCompression
Compression sampling rate: 0
Memtablerep: skip_list
Perf Level: 1
I ran the readrandom workload for 1 minute. Detailed throughput results: (ops/second)
Sample rate 0: no block cache tracing.
Sample rate 1: trace all block accesses.
Sample rate 100: trace accesses 1% blocks.
1 thread | | | -- | -- | -- | --
Sample rate | 0 | 1 | 100
1 MB block cache size | 13,094 | 13,166 | 13,341
10 GB block cache size | 202,243 | 188,677 | 229,182
16 threads | | | -- | -- | -- | --
Sample rate | 0 | 1 | 100
1 MB block cache size | 208,761 | 178,700 | 201,872
10 GB block cache size | 2,645,996 | 426,295 | 2,587,605
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5473
Differential Revision: D15869479
Pulled By: HaoyuHuang
fbshipit-source-id: 7ae802abe84811281a6af8649f489887cd7c4618
haoyuhuang