You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
rocksdb/tools/db_stress.cc

1609 lines
52 KiB

// Copyright (c) 2011 The LevelDB Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file. See the AUTHORS file for names of contributors.
[Report the #gets and #founds in db_stress] Summary: Also added some comments and fixed some bugs in stats reporting. Now the stats seem to match what is expected. Test Plan: [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --test_batches_snapshots=1 --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 1 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7f4542bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Limited verification already done during gets Stress Test : 1811.551 micros/op 552 ops/sec : Wrote 0.10 MB (0.05 MB/sec) (598% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 6050 times : Deleted 3050 times : 500/900 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 0 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 80 locks 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7fc0f5bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Starting verification Stress Test : 1836.258 micros/op 544 ops/sec : Wrote 0.01 MB (0.01 MB/sec) (59% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 605 times : Deleted 305 times : 50/90 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9081
12 years ago
//
// The test uses an array to compare against values written to the database.
// Keys written to the array are in 1:1 correspondence to the actual values in
// the database according to the formula in the function GenerateValue.
// Space is reserved in the array from 0 to FLAGS_max_key and values are
// randomly written/deleted/read from those positions. During verification we
// compare all the positions in the array. To shorten/elongate the running
// time, you could change the settings: FLAGS_max_key, FLAGS_ops_per_thread,
// (sometimes also FLAGS_threads).
//
// NOTE that if FLAGS_test_batches_snapshots is set, the test will have
// different behavior. See comment of the flag for details.
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include "db/db_impl.h"
#include "db/version_set.h"
#include "db/db_statistics.h"
#include "rocksdb/cache.h"
#include "utilities/utility_db.h"
#include "rocksdb/env.h"
#include "rocksdb/write_batch.h"
#include "rocksdb/statistics.h"
#include "port/port.h"
#include "util/coding.h"
#include "util/crc32c.h"
#include "util/histogram.h"
#include "util/mutexlock.h"
#include "util/random.h"
#include "util/testutil.h"
#include "util/logging.h"
#include "utilities/ttl/db_ttl.h"
#include "hdfs/env_hdfs.h"
#include "utilities/merge_operators.h"
static const long KB = 1024;
// Seed for PRNG
static uint32_t FLAGS_seed = 2341234;
// Max number of key/values to place in database
static long FLAGS_max_key = 1 * KB * KB * KB;
// If set, the test uses MultiGet(), MultiPut() and MultiDelete() which
// read/write/delete multiple keys in a batch. In this mode, we do not verify
// db content by comparing the content with the pre-allocated array. Instead,
// we do partial verification inside MultiGet() by checking various values in
// a batch. Benefit of this mode:
// (a) No need to acquire mutexes during writes (less cache flushes
// in multi-core leading to speed up)
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
// (b) No long validation at the end (more speed up)
// (c) Test snapshot and atomicity of batch writes
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
static bool FLAGS_test_batches_snapshots = false;
// Number of concurrent threads to run.
static int FLAGS_threads = 32;
// Opens the db with this ttl value if this is not -1
// Carefully specify a large value such that verifications on deleted
// values don't fail
static int FLAGS_ttl = -1;
// Size of each value will be this number times rand_int(1,3) bytes
static int FLAGS_value_size_mult = 8;
static bool FLAGS_verify_before_write = false;
// Print histogram of operation timings
static bool FLAGS_histogram = false;
// Destroys the database dir before start if this is true
static bool FLAGS_destroy_db_initially = true;
static bool FLAGS_verbose = false;
// Number of bytes to buffer in memtable before compacting
// (initialized to default value by "main")
static int FLAGS_write_buffer_size = 0;
// The number of in-memory memtables.
// Each memtable is of size FLAGS_write_buffer_size.
// This is initialized to default value of 2 in "main" function.
static int FLAGS_max_write_buffer_number = 0;
// The minimum number of write buffers that will be merged together
// before writing to storage. This is cheap because it is an
// in-memory merge. If this feature is not enabled, then all these
// write buffers are flushed to L0 as separate files and this increases
// read amplification because a get request has to check in all of these
// files. Also, an in-memory merge may result in writing less
// data to storage if there are duplicate records in each of these
// individual write buffers.
static int FLAGS_min_write_buffer_number_to_merge = 0;
// The maximum number of concurrent background compactions
// that can occur in parallel.
// This is initialized to default value of 1 in "main" function.
static int FLAGS_max_background_compactions = 0;
// This is initialized to default value of false
static leveldb::CompactionStyle FLAGS_compaction_style = leveldb::kCompactionStyleLevel;
// The ratio of file sizes that trigger compaction in universal style
static unsigned int FLAGS_universal_size_ratio = 0;
// The minimum number of files to compact in universal style compaction
static unsigned int FLAGS_universal_min_merge_width = 0;
// The max number of files to compact in universal style compaction
static unsigned int FLAGS_universal_max_merge_width = 0;
// The max size amplification for universal style compaction
static unsigned int FLAGS_universal_max_size_amplification_percent = 0;
// Number of bytes to use as a cache of uncompressed data.
static long FLAGS_cache_size = 2 * KB * KB * KB;
// Number of bytes in a block.
static int FLAGS_block_size = 4 * KB;
// Number of times database reopens
static int FLAGS_reopen = 10;
// Maximum number of files to keep open at the same time (use default if == 0)
static int FLAGS_open_files = 0;
// Bloom filter bits per key.
// Negative means use default settings.
static int FLAGS_bloom_bits = 10;
// Use the db with the following name.
static const char* FLAGS_db = nullptr;
// Verify checksum for every block read from storage
static bool FLAGS_verify_checksum = false;
// Allow reads to occur via mmap-ing files
static bool FLAGS_use_mmap_reads = leveldb::EnvOptions().use_mmap_reads;
// Database statistics
static std::shared_ptr<leveldb::Statistics> dbstats;
// Sync all writes to disk
static bool FLAGS_sync = false;
// If true, do not wait until data is synced to disk.
static bool FLAGS_disable_data_sync = false;
// If true, issue fsync instead of fdatasync
static bool FLAGS_use_fsync = false;
[Kill randomly at various points in source code for testing] Summary: This is initial version. A few ways in which this could be extended in the future are: (a) Killing from more places in source code (b) Hashing stack and using that hash in determining whether to crash. This is to avoid crashing more often at source lines that are executed more often. (c) Raising exceptions or returning errors instead of killing Test Plan: This whole thing is for testing. Here is part of output: python2.7 tools/db_crashtest2.py -d 600 Running db_stress db_stress retncode -15 output LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000000 Read percentage : 50 Write-buffer-size : 4194304 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 1000 Ratio #ops/#keys : 320000 Num times DB reopens: 0 Batches/snapshots : 1 Purge redundant % : 50 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/04/26-17:55:17 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7fc1f07ff700 ... finished 60000 ops Running db_stress db_stress retncode -15 output LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000000 Read percentage : 50 Write-buffer-size : 4194304 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 1000 Ratio #ops/#keys : 320000 Num times DB reopens: 0 Batches/snapshots : 1 Purge redundant % : 50 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Created bg thread 0x7ff0137ff700 No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/04/26-17:56:15 Starting database operations ... finished 90000 ops Revert Plan: OK Task ID: #2252691 Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb, haobo Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D10581
12 years ago
// If non-zero, kill at various points in source code with probability 1/this
static int FLAGS_kill_random_test = 0;
extern int leveldb_kill_odds;
// If true, do not write WAL for write.
static bool FLAGS_disable_wal = false;
// Target level-1 file size for compaction
static int FLAGS_target_file_size_base = 64 * KB;
// A multiplier to compute targe level-N file size (N >= 2)
static int FLAGS_target_file_size_multiplier = 1;
// Max bytes for level-1
static uint64_t FLAGS_max_bytes_for_level_base = 256 * KB;
// A multiplier to compute max bytes for level-N (N >= 2)
static int FLAGS_max_bytes_for_level_multiplier = 2;
// Number of files in level-0 that will trigger put stop.
static int FLAGS_level0_stop_writes_trigger = 12;
// Number of files in level-0 that will slow down writes.
static int FLAGS_level0_slowdown_writes_trigger = 8;
// Ratio of reads to total workload (expressed as a percentage)
static unsigned int FLAGS_readpercent = 10;
// Ratio of prefix iterators to total workload (expressed as a percentage)
static unsigned int FLAGS_prefixpercent = 20;
// Ratio of deletes to total workload (expressed as a percentage)
static unsigned int FLAGS_writepercent = 45;
// Ratio of deletes to total workload (expressed as a percentage)
static unsigned int FLAGS_delpercent = 15;
// Ratio of iterations to total workload (expressed as a percentage)
static unsigned int FLAGS_iterpercent = 10;
// Number of iterations per MultiIterate run
static uint32_t FLAGS_num_iterations = 10;
// Option to disable compation triggered by read.
static int FLAGS_disable_seek_compaction = false;
// Option to delete obsolete files periodically
// Default: 0 which means that obsolete files are
// deleted after every compaction run.
static uint64_t FLAGS_delete_obsolete_files_period_micros = 0;
// Algorithm to use to compress the database
static enum leveldb::CompressionType FLAGS_compression_type =
leveldb::kSnappyCompression;
// posix or hdfs environment
static leveldb::Env* FLAGS_env = leveldb::Env::Default();
// Number of operations per thread.
static uint32_t FLAGS_ops_per_thread = 600000;
// Log2 of number of keys per lock
static uint32_t FLAGS_log2_keys_per_lock = 2; // implies 2^2 keys per lock
// Percentage of times we want to purge redundant keys in memory before flushing
static uint32_t FLAGS_purge_redundant_percent = 50;
// On true, deletes use KeyMayExist to drop the delete if key not present
static bool FLAGS_filter_deletes = false;
// Level0 compaction start trigger
static int FLAGS_level0_file_num_compaction_trigger = 0;
enum RepFactory {
kSkipList,
kPrefixHash,
kUnsorted,
kVectorRep
};
static enum RepFactory FLAGS_rep_factory;
// Control the prefix size for PrefixHashRep
static bool FLAGS_prefix_size = 0;
// On true, replaces all writes with a Merge that behaves like a Put
static bool FLAGS_use_merge_put = false;
namespace leveldb {
// convert long to a big-endian slice key
static std::string Key(long val) {
std::string little_endian_key;
std::string big_endian_key;
PutFixed64(&little_endian_key, val);
assert(little_endian_key.size() == sizeof(val));
big_endian_key.resize(sizeof(val));
for (int i=0; i<(int)sizeof(val); i++) {
big_endian_key[i] = little_endian_key[sizeof(val) - 1 - i];
}
return big_endian_key;
}
class StressTest;
namespace {
class Stats {
private:
double start_;
double finish_;
double seconds_;
long done_;
long gets_;
long prefixes_;
long writes_;
long deletes_;
long iterator_size_sums_;
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
long founds_;
long iterations_;
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
long errors_;
int next_report_;
size_t bytes_;
double last_op_finish_;
HistogramImpl hist_;
public:
Stats() { }
void Start() {
next_report_ = 100;
hist_.Clear();
done_ = 0;
gets_ = 0;
prefixes_ = 0;
writes_ = 0;
deletes_ = 0;
iterator_size_sums_ = 0;
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
founds_ = 0;
iterations_ = 0;
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
errors_ = 0;
bytes_ = 0;
seconds_ = 0;
start_ = FLAGS_env->NowMicros();
last_op_finish_ = start_;
finish_ = start_;
}
void Merge(const Stats& other) {
hist_.Merge(other.hist_);
done_ += other.done_;
gets_ += other.gets_;
prefixes_ += other.prefixes_;
writes_ += other.writes_;
deletes_ += other.deletes_;
iterator_size_sums_ += other.iterator_size_sums_;
[Report the #gets and #founds in db_stress] Summary: Also added some comments and fixed some bugs in stats reporting. Now the stats seem to match what is expected. Test Plan: [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --test_batches_snapshots=1 --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 1 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7f4542bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Limited verification already done during gets Stress Test : 1811.551 micros/op 552 ops/sec : Wrote 0.10 MB (0.05 MB/sec) (598% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 6050 times : Deleted 3050 times : 500/900 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 0 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 80 locks 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7fc0f5bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Starting verification Stress Test : 1836.258 micros/op 544 ops/sec : Wrote 0.01 MB (0.01 MB/sec) (59% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 605 times : Deleted 305 times : 50/90 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9081
12 years ago
founds_ += other.founds_;
iterations_ += other.iterations_;
[Report the #gets and #founds in db_stress] Summary: Also added some comments and fixed some bugs in stats reporting. Now the stats seem to match what is expected. Test Plan: [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --test_batches_snapshots=1 --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 1 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7f4542bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Limited verification already done during gets Stress Test : 1811.551 micros/op 552 ops/sec : Wrote 0.10 MB (0.05 MB/sec) (598% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 6050 times : Deleted 3050 times : 500/900 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 0 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 80 locks 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7fc0f5bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Starting verification Stress Test : 1836.258 micros/op 544 ops/sec : Wrote 0.01 MB (0.01 MB/sec) (59% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 605 times : Deleted 305 times : 50/90 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9081
12 years ago
errors_ += other.errors_;
bytes_ += other.bytes_;
seconds_ += other.seconds_;
if (other.start_ < start_) start_ = other.start_;
if (other.finish_ > finish_) finish_ = other.finish_;
}
void Stop() {
finish_ = FLAGS_env->NowMicros();
seconds_ = (finish_ - start_) * 1e-6;
}
void FinishedSingleOp() {
if (FLAGS_histogram) {
double now = FLAGS_env->NowMicros();
double micros = now - last_op_finish_;
hist_.Add(micros);
if (micros > 20000) {
fprintf(stdout, "long op: %.1f micros%30s\r", micros, "");
}
last_op_finish_ = now;
}
done_++;
if (done_ >= next_report_) {
if (next_report_ < 1000) next_report_ += 100;
else if (next_report_ < 5000) next_report_ += 500;
else if (next_report_ < 10000) next_report_ += 1000;
else if (next_report_ < 50000) next_report_ += 5000;
else if (next_report_ < 100000) next_report_ += 10000;
else if (next_report_ < 500000) next_report_ += 50000;
else next_report_ += 100000;
fprintf(stdout, "... finished %ld ops%30s\r", done_, "");
}
}
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
void AddBytesForWrites(int nwrites, size_t nbytes) {
writes_ += nwrites;
bytes_ += nbytes;
}
[Report the #gets and #founds in db_stress] Summary: Also added some comments and fixed some bugs in stats reporting. Now the stats seem to match what is expected. Test Plan: [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --test_batches_snapshots=1 --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 1 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7f4542bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Limited verification already done during gets Stress Test : 1811.551 micros/op 552 ops/sec : Wrote 0.10 MB (0.05 MB/sec) (598% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 6050 times : Deleted 3050 times : 500/900 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 0 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 80 locks 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7fc0f5bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Starting verification Stress Test : 1836.258 micros/op 544 ops/sec : Wrote 0.01 MB (0.01 MB/sec) (59% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 605 times : Deleted 305 times : 50/90 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9081
12 years ago
void AddGets(int ngets, int nfounds) {
founds_ += nfounds;
gets_ += ngets;
}
void AddPrefixes(int nprefixes, int count) {
prefixes_ += nprefixes;
iterator_size_sums_ += count;
}
void AddIterations(int n) {
iterations_ += n;
}
void AddDeletes(int n) {
deletes_ += n;
}
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
void AddErrors(int n) {
errors_ += n;
}
void Report(const char* name) {
std::string extra;
if (bytes_ < 1 || done_ < 1) {
fprintf(stderr, "No writes or ops?\n");
return;
}
double elapsed = (finish_ - start_) * 1e-6;
double bytes_mb = bytes_ / 1048576.0;
double rate = bytes_mb / elapsed;
double throughput = (double)done_/elapsed;
fprintf(stdout, "%-12s: ", name);
fprintf(stdout, "%.3f micros/op %ld ops/sec\n",
seconds_ * 1e6 / done_, (long)throughput);
fprintf(stdout, "%-12s: Wrote %.2f MB (%.2f MB/sec) (%ld%% of %ld ops)\n",
"", bytes_mb, rate, (100*writes_)/done_, done_);
[Report the #gets and #founds in db_stress] Summary: Also added some comments and fixed some bugs in stats reporting. Now the stats seem to match what is expected. Test Plan: [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --test_batches_snapshots=1 --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 1 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7f4542bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Limited verification already done during gets Stress Test : 1811.551 micros/op 552 ops/sec : Wrote 0.10 MB (0.05 MB/sec) (598% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 6050 times : Deleted 3050 times : 500/900 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 0 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 80 locks 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7fc0f5bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Starting verification Stress Test : 1836.258 micros/op 544 ops/sec : Wrote 0.01 MB (0.01 MB/sec) (59% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 605 times : Deleted 305 times : 50/90 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9081
12 years ago
fprintf(stdout, "%-12s: Wrote %ld times\n", "", writes_);
fprintf(stdout, "%-12s: Deleted %ld times\n", "", deletes_);
fprintf(stdout, "%-12s: %ld read and %ld found the key\n", "",
gets_, founds_);
fprintf(stdout, "%-12s: Prefix scanned %ld times\n", "", prefixes_);
fprintf(stdout, "%-12s: Iterator size sum is %ld\n", "",
iterator_size_sums_);
fprintf(stdout, "%-12s: Iterated %ld times\n", "", iterations_);
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
fprintf(stdout, "%-12s: Got errors %ld times\n", "", errors_);
if (FLAGS_histogram) {
fprintf(stdout, "Microseconds per op:\n%s\n", hist_.ToString().c_str());
}
fflush(stdout);
}
};
// State shared by all concurrent executions of the same benchmark.
class SharedState {
public:
static const uint32_t SENTINEL = 0xffffffff;
explicit SharedState(StressTest* stress_test) :
cv_(&mu_),
seed_(FLAGS_seed),
max_key_(FLAGS_max_key),
log2_keys_per_lock_(FLAGS_log2_keys_per_lock),
num_threads_(FLAGS_threads),
num_initialized_(0),
num_populated_(0),
vote_reopen_(0),
num_done_(0),
start_(false),
start_verify_(false),
stress_test_(stress_test) {
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
if (FLAGS_test_batches_snapshots) {
key_locks_ = nullptr;
values_ = nullptr;
fprintf(stdout, "No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set\n");
return;
}
values_ = new uint32_t[max_key_];
for (long i = 0; i < max_key_; i++) {
values_[i] = SENTINEL;
}
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
long num_locks = (max_key_ >> log2_keys_per_lock_);
if (max_key_ & ((1 << log2_keys_per_lock_) - 1)) {
num_locks ++;
}
fprintf(stdout, "Creating %ld locks\n", num_locks);
key_locks_ = new port::Mutex[num_locks];
}
~SharedState() {
delete[] values_;
delete[] key_locks_;
}
port::Mutex* GetMutex() {
return &mu_;
}
port::CondVar* GetCondVar() {
return &cv_;
}
StressTest* GetStressTest() const {
return stress_test_;
}
long GetMaxKey() const {
return max_key_;
}
uint32_t GetNumThreads() const {
return num_threads_;
}
void IncInitialized() {
num_initialized_++;
}
void IncOperated() {
num_populated_++;
}
void IncDone() {
num_done_++;
}
void IncVotedReopen() {
vote_reopen_ = (vote_reopen_ + 1) % num_threads_;
}
bool AllInitialized() const {
return num_initialized_ >= num_threads_;
}
bool AllOperated() const {
return num_populated_ >= num_threads_;
}
bool AllDone() const {
return num_done_ >= num_threads_;
}
bool AllVotedReopen() {
return (vote_reopen_ == 0);
}
void SetStart() {
start_ = true;
}
void SetStartVerify() {
start_verify_ = true;
}
bool Started() const {
return start_;
}
bool VerifyStarted() const {
return start_verify_;
}
port::Mutex* GetMutexForKey(long key) {
return &key_locks_[key >> log2_keys_per_lock_];
}
void Put(long key, uint32_t value_base) {
values_[key] = value_base;
}
uint32_t Get(long key) const {
return values_[key];
}
void Delete(long key) const {
values_[key] = SENTINEL;
}
uint32_t GetSeed() const {
return seed_;
}
private:
port::Mutex mu_;
port::CondVar cv_;
const uint32_t seed_;
const long max_key_;
const uint32_t log2_keys_per_lock_;
const int num_threads_;
long num_initialized_;
long num_populated_;
long vote_reopen_;
long num_done_;
bool start_;
bool start_verify_;
StressTest* stress_test_;
uint32_t *values_;
port::Mutex *key_locks_;
};
// Per-thread state for concurrent executions of the same benchmark.
struct ThreadState {
uint32_t tid; // 0..n-1
Random rand; // Has different seeds for different threads
SharedState* shared;
Stats stats;
ThreadState(uint32_t index, SharedState *shared)
: tid(index),
rand(1000 + index + shared->GetSeed()),
shared(shared) {
}
};
} // namespace
class StressTest {
public:
StressTest()
: cache_(NewLRUCache(FLAGS_cache_size)),
filter_policy_(FLAGS_bloom_bits >= 0
? NewBloomFilterPolicy(FLAGS_bloom_bits)
: nullptr),
prefix_extractor_(NewFixedPrefixTransform(
FLAGS_test_batches_snapshots ?
sizeof(long) : sizeof(long)-1)),
db_(nullptr),
num_times_reopened_(0) {
if (FLAGS_destroy_db_initially) {
std::vector<std::string> files;
FLAGS_env->GetChildren(FLAGS_db, &files);
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < files.size(); i++) {
if (Slice(files[i]).starts_with("heap-")) {
FLAGS_env->DeleteFile(std::string(FLAGS_db) + "/" + files[i]);
}
}
DestroyDB(FLAGS_db, Options());
}
}
~StressTest() {
delete db_;
delete filter_policy_;
delete prefix_extractor_;
}
void Run() {
PrintEnv();
Open();
SharedState shared(this);
uint32_t n = shared.GetNumThreads();
std::vector<ThreadState*> threads(n);
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < n; i++) {
threads[i] = new ThreadState(i, &shared);
FLAGS_env->StartThread(ThreadBody, threads[i]);
}
// Each thread goes through the following states:
// initializing -> wait for others to init -> read/populate/depopulate
// wait for others to operate -> verify -> done
{
MutexLock l(shared.GetMutex());
while (!shared.AllInitialized()) {
shared.GetCondVar()->Wait();
}
double now = FLAGS_env->NowMicros();
fprintf(stdout, "%s Starting database operations\n",
FLAGS_env->TimeToString((uint64_t) now/1000000).c_str());
shared.SetStart();
shared.GetCondVar()->SignalAll();
while (!shared.AllOperated()) {
shared.GetCondVar()->Wait();
}
now = FLAGS_env->NowMicros();
[Report the #gets and #founds in db_stress] Summary: Also added some comments and fixed some bugs in stats reporting. Now the stats seem to match what is expected. Test Plan: [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --test_batches_snapshots=1 --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 1 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7f4542bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Limited verification already done during gets Stress Test : 1811.551 micros/op 552 ops/sec : Wrote 0.10 MB (0.05 MB/sec) (598% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 6050 times : Deleted 3050 times : 500/900 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 0 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 80 locks 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7fc0f5bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Starting verification Stress Test : 1836.258 micros/op 544 ops/sec : Wrote 0.01 MB (0.01 MB/sec) (59% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 605 times : Deleted 305 times : 50/90 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9081
12 years ago
if (FLAGS_test_batches_snapshots) {
fprintf(stdout, "%s Limited verification already done during gets\n",
FLAGS_env->TimeToString((uint64_t) now/1000000).c_str());
} else {
fprintf(stdout, "%s Starting verification\n",
FLAGS_env->TimeToString((uint64_t) now/1000000).c_str());
}
shared.SetStartVerify();
shared.GetCondVar()->SignalAll();
while (!shared.AllDone()) {
shared.GetCondVar()->Wait();
}
}
for (unsigned int i = 1; i < n; i++) {
threads[0]->stats.Merge(threads[i]->stats);
}
threads[0]->stats.Report("Stress Test");
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
delete threads[i];
threads[i] = nullptr;
}
double now = FLAGS_env->NowMicros();
[Report the #gets and #founds in db_stress] Summary: Also added some comments and fixed some bugs in stats reporting. Now the stats seem to match what is expected. Test Plan: [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --test_batches_snapshots=1 --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 1 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7f4542bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Limited verification already done during gets Stress Test : 1811.551 micros/op 552 ops/sec : Wrote 0.10 MB (0.05 MB/sec) (598% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 6050 times : Deleted 3050 times : 500/900 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 0 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 80 locks 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7fc0f5bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Starting verification Stress Test : 1836.258 micros/op 544 ops/sec : Wrote 0.01 MB (0.01 MB/sec) (59% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 605 times : Deleted 305 times : 50/90 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9081
12 years ago
if (!FLAGS_test_batches_snapshots) {
fprintf(stdout, "%s Verification successful\n",
FLAGS_env->TimeToString((uint64_t) now/1000000).c_str());
}
PrintStatistics();
}
private:
static void ThreadBody(void* v) {
ThreadState* thread = reinterpret_cast<ThreadState*>(v);
SharedState* shared = thread->shared;
{
MutexLock l(shared->GetMutex());
shared->IncInitialized();
if (shared->AllInitialized()) {
shared->GetCondVar()->SignalAll();
}
while (!shared->Started()) {
shared->GetCondVar()->Wait();
}
}
thread->shared->GetStressTest()->OperateDb(thread);
{
MutexLock l(shared->GetMutex());
shared->IncOperated();
if (shared->AllOperated()) {
shared->GetCondVar()->SignalAll();
}
while (!shared->VerifyStarted()) {
shared->GetCondVar()->Wait();
}
}
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
if (!FLAGS_test_batches_snapshots) {
thread->shared->GetStressTest()->VerifyDb(*(thread->shared),
thread->tid);
}
{
MutexLock l(shared->GetMutex());
shared->IncDone();
if (shared->AllDone()) {
shared->GetCondVar()->SignalAll();
}
}
}
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
// Given a key K and value V, this puts ("0"+K, "0"+V), ("1"+K, "1"+V), ...
// ("9"+K, "9"+V) in DB atomically i.e in a single batch.
// Also refer MultiGet.
Status MultiPut(ThreadState* thread,
const WriteOptions& writeoptions,
const Slice& key, const Slice& value, size_t sz) {
std::string keys[10] = {"9", "8", "7", "6", "5",
"4", "3", "2", "1", "0"};
std::string values[10] = {"9", "8", "7", "6", "5",
"4", "3", "2", "1", "0"};
Slice value_slices[10];
WriteBatch batch;
Status s;
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
keys[i] += key.ToString();
values[i] += value.ToString();
value_slices[i] = values[i];
if (FLAGS_use_merge_put) {
batch.Merge(keys[i], value_slices[i]);
} else {
batch.Put(keys[i], value_slices[i]);
}
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
}
s = db_->Write(writeoptions, &batch);
if (!s.ok()) {
fprintf(stderr, "multiput error: %s\n", s.ToString().c_str());
thread->stats.AddErrors(1);
} else {
// we did 10 writes each of size sz + 1
thread->stats.AddBytesForWrites(10, (sz + 1) * 10);
}
return s;
}
// Given a key K, this deletes ("0"+K), ("1"+K),... ("9"+K)
// in DB atomically i.e in a single batch. Also refer MultiGet.
Status MultiDelete(ThreadState* thread,
const WriteOptions& writeoptions,
const Slice& key) {
std::string keys[10] = {"9", "7", "5", "3", "1",
"8", "6", "4", "2", "0"};
WriteBatch batch;
Status s;
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
keys[i] += key.ToString();
batch.Delete(keys[i]);
}
s = db_->Write(writeoptions, &batch);
if (!s.ok()) {
fprintf(stderr, "multidelete error: %s\n", s.ToString().c_str());
thread->stats.AddErrors(1);
} else {
thread->stats.AddDeletes(10);
}
return s;
}
// Given a key K, this gets values for "0"+K, "1"+K,..."9"+K
// in the same snapshot, and verifies that all the values are of the form
// "0"+V, "1"+V,..."9"+V.
// ASSUMES that MultiPut was used to put (K, V) into the DB.
Status MultiGet(ThreadState* thread,
const ReadOptions& readoptions,
const Slice& key, std::string* value) {
std::string keys[10] = {"0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9"};
Slice key_slices[10];
std::string values[10];
ReadOptions readoptionscopy = readoptions;
readoptionscopy.snapshot = db_->GetSnapshot();
Status s;
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
keys[i] += key.ToString();
key_slices[i] = keys[i];
s = db_->Get(readoptionscopy, key_slices[i], value);
if (!s.ok() && !s.IsNotFound()) {
fprintf(stderr, "get error: %s\n", s.ToString().c_str());
values[i] = "";
thread->stats.AddErrors(1);
// we continue after error rather than exiting so that we can
// find more errors if any
} else if (s.IsNotFound()) {
values[i] = "";
[Report the #gets and #founds in db_stress] Summary: Also added some comments and fixed some bugs in stats reporting. Now the stats seem to match what is expected. Test Plan: [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --test_batches_snapshots=1 --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 1 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7f4542bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Limited verification already done during gets Stress Test : 1811.551 micros/op 552 ops/sec : Wrote 0.10 MB (0.05 MB/sec) (598% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 6050 times : Deleted 3050 times : 500/900 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 0 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 80 locks 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7fc0f5bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Starting verification Stress Test : 1836.258 micros/op 544 ops/sec : Wrote 0.01 MB (0.01 MB/sec) (59% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 605 times : Deleted 305 times : 50/90 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9081
12 years ago
thread->stats.AddGets(1, 0);
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
} else {
values[i] = *value;
char expected_prefix = (keys[i])[0];
char actual_prefix = (values[i])[0];
if (actual_prefix != expected_prefix) {
[Kill randomly at various points in source code for testing] Summary: This is initial version. A few ways in which this could be extended in the future are: (a) Killing from more places in source code (b) Hashing stack and using that hash in determining whether to crash. This is to avoid crashing more often at source lines that are executed more often. (c) Raising exceptions or returning errors instead of killing Test Plan: This whole thing is for testing. Here is part of output: python2.7 tools/db_crashtest2.py -d 600 Running db_stress db_stress retncode -15 output LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000000 Read percentage : 50 Write-buffer-size : 4194304 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 1000 Ratio #ops/#keys : 320000 Num times DB reopens: 0 Batches/snapshots : 1 Purge redundant % : 50 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/04/26-17:55:17 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7fc1f07ff700 ... finished 60000 ops Running db_stress db_stress retncode -15 output LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000000 Read percentage : 50 Write-buffer-size : 4194304 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 1000 Ratio #ops/#keys : 320000 Num times DB reopens: 0 Batches/snapshots : 1 Purge redundant % : 50 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Created bg thread 0x7ff0137ff700 No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/04/26-17:56:15 Starting database operations ... finished 90000 ops Revert Plan: OK Task ID: #2252691 Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb, haobo Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D10581
12 years ago
fprintf(stderr, "error expected prefix = %c actual = %c\n",
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
expected_prefix, actual_prefix);
}
(values[i])[0] = ' '; // blank out the differing character
[Report the #gets and #founds in db_stress] Summary: Also added some comments and fixed some bugs in stats reporting. Now the stats seem to match what is expected. Test Plan: [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --test_batches_snapshots=1 --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 1 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7f4542bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Limited verification already done during gets Stress Test : 1811.551 micros/op 552 ops/sec : Wrote 0.10 MB (0.05 MB/sec) (598% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 6050 times : Deleted 3050 times : 500/900 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 0 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 80 locks 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7fc0f5bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Starting verification Stress Test : 1836.258 micros/op 544 ops/sec : Wrote 0.01 MB (0.01 MB/sec) (59% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 605 times : Deleted 305 times : 50/90 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9081
12 years ago
thread->stats.AddGets(1, 1);
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
}
}
db_->ReleaseSnapshot(readoptionscopy.snapshot);
// Now that we retrieved all values, check that they all match
for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++) {
if (values[i] != values[0]) {
[Kill randomly at various points in source code for testing] Summary: This is initial version. A few ways in which this could be extended in the future are: (a) Killing from more places in source code (b) Hashing stack and using that hash in determining whether to crash. This is to avoid crashing more often at source lines that are executed more often. (c) Raising exceptions or returning errors instead of killing Test Plan: This whole thing is for testing. Here is part of output: python2.7 tools/db_crashtest2.py -d 600 Running db_stress db_stress retncode -15 output LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000000 Read percentage : 50 Write-buffer-size : 4194304 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 1000 Ratio #ops/#keys : 320000 Num times DB reopens: 0 Batches/snapshots : 1 Purge redundant % : 50 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/04/26-17:55:17 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7fc1f07ff700 ... finished 60000 ops Running db_stress db_stress retncode -15 output LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000000 Read percentage : 50 Write-buffer-size : 4194304 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 1000 Ratio #ops/#keys : 320000 Num times DB reopens: 0 Batches/snapshots : 1 Purge redundant % : 50 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Created bg thread 0x7ff0137ff700 No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/04/26-17:56:15 Starting database operations ... finished 90000 ops Revert Plan: OK Task ID: #2252691 Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb, haobo Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D10581
12 years ago
fprintf(stderr, "error : inconsistent values for key %s: %s, %s\n",
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
key.ToString().c_str(), values[0].c_str(),
values[i].c_str());
// we continue after error rather than exiting so that we can
// find more errors if any
}
}
return s;
}
// Given a prefix P, this does prefix scans for "0"+P, "1"+P,..."9"+P
// in the same snapshot. Each of these 10 scans returns a series of
// values; each series should be the same length, and it is verified
// for each index i that all the i'th values are of the form "0"+V,
// "1"+V,..."9"+V.
// ASSUMES that MultiPut was used to put (K, V)
Status MultiPrefixScan(ThreadState* thread,
const ReadOptions& readoptions,
const Slice& prefix) {
std::string prefixes[10] = {"0", "1", "2", "3", "4",
"5", "6", "7", "8", "9"};
Slice prefix_slices[10];
ReadOptions readoptionscopy[10];
const Snapshot* snapshot = db_->GetSnapshot();
Iterator* iters[10];
Status s = Status::OK();
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
prefixes[i] += prefix.ToString();
prefix_slices[i] = prefixes[i];
readoptionscopy[i] = readoptions;
readoptionscopy[i].prefix = &prefix_slices[i];
readoptionscopy[i].snapshot = snapshot;
iters[i] = db_->NewIterator(readoptionscopy[i]);
iters[i]->SeekToFirst();
}
int count = 0;
while (iters[0]->Valid()) {
count++;
std::string values[10];
// get list of all values for this iteration
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
// no iterator should finish before the first one
assert(iters[i]->Valid());
values[i] = iters[i]->value().ToString();
char expected_first = (prefixes[i])[0];
char actual_first = (values[i])[0];
if (actual_first != expected_first) {
fprintf(stderr, "error expected first = %c actual = %c\n",
expected_first, actual_first);
}
(values[i])[0] = ' '; // blank out the differing character
}
// make sure all values are equivalent
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
if (values[i] != values[0]) {
fprintf(stderr, "error : inconsistent values for prefix %s: %s, %s\n",
prefix.ToString().c_str(), values[0].c_str(),
values[i].c_str());
// we continue after error rather than exiting so that we can
// find more errors if any
}
iters[i]->Next();
}
}
// cleanup iterators and snapshot
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
// if the first iterator finished, they should have all finished
assert(!iters[i]->Valid());
assert(iters[i]->status().ok());
delete iters[i];
}
db_->ReleaseSnapshot(snapshot);
if (s.ok()) {
thread->stats.AddPrefixes(1, count);
} else {
thread->stats.AddErrors(1);
}
return s;
}
// Given a key K, this creates an iterator which scans to K and then
// does a random sequence of Next/Prev operations.
Status MultiIterate(ThreadState* thread,
const ReadOptions& readoptions,
const Slice& key) {
Status s;
const Snapshot* snapshot = db_->GetSnapshot();
ReadOptions readoptionscopy = readoptions;
readoptionscopy.snapshot = snapshot;
unique_ptr<Iterator> iter(db_->NewIterator(readoptionscopy));
iter->Seek(key);
for (long i = 0; i < FLAGS_num_iterations && iter->Valid(); i++) {
if (thread->rand.OneIn(2)) {
iter->Next();
} else {
iter->Prev();
}
}
if (s.ok()) {
thread->stats.AddIterations(1);
} else {
thread->stats.AddErrors(1);
}
db_->ReleaseSnapshot(snapshot);
return s;
}
void OperateDb(ThreadState* thread) {
ReadOptions read_opts(FLAGS_verify_checksum, true);
WriteOptions write_opts;
char value[100];
long max_key = thread->shared->GetMaxKey();
std::string from_db;
if (FLAGS_sync) {
write_opts.sync = true;
}
write_opts.disableWAL = FLAGS_disable_wal;
const int prefixBound = (int)FLAGS_readpercent + (int)FLAGS_prefixpercent;
const int writeBound = prefixBound + (int)FLAGS_writepercent;
const int delBound = writeBound + (int)FLAGS_delpercent;
thread->stats.Start();
for (long i = 0; i < FLAGS_ops_per_thread; i++) {
if(i != 0 && (i % (FLAGS_ops_per_thread / (FLAGS_reopen + 1))) == 0) {
{
thread->stats.FinishedSingleOp();
MutexLock l(thread->shared->GetMutex());
thread->shared->IncVotedReopen();
if (thread->shared->AllVotedReopen()) {
thread->shared->GetStressTest()->Reopen();
thread->shared->GetCondVar()->SignalAll();
}
else {
thread->shared->GetCondVar()->Wait();
}
[Report the #gets and #founds in db_stress] Summary: Also added some comments and fixed some bugs in stats reporting. Now the stats seem to match what is expected. Test Plan: [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --test_batches_snapshots=1 --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 1 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7f4542bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Limited verification already done during gets Stress Test : 1811.551 micros/op 552 ops/sec : Wrote 0.10 MB (0.05 MB/sec) (598% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 6050 times : Deleted 3050 times : 500/900 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 0 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 80 locks 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7fc0f5bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Starting verification Stress Test : 1836.258 micros/op 544 ops/sec : Wrote 0.01 MB (0.01 MB/sec) (59% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 605 times : Deleted 305 times : 50/90 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9081
12 years ago
// Commenting this out as we don't want to reset stats on each open.
// thread->stats.Start();
}
}
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
long rand_key = thread->rand.Next() % max_key;
std::string keystr = Key(rand_key);
Slice key = keystr;
int prob_op = thread->rand.Uniform(100);
if (prob_op >= 0 && prob_op < (int)FLAGS_readpercent) {
// OPERATION read
[Report the #gets and #founds in db_stress] Summary: Also added some comments and fixed some bugs in stats reporting. Now the stats seem to match what is expected. Test Plan: [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --test_batches_snapshots=1 --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 1 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7f4542bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:56 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:57 Limited verification already done during gets Stress Test : 1811.551 micros/op 552 ops/sec : Wrote 0.10 MB (0.05 MB/sec) (598% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 6050 times : Deleted 3050 times : 500/900 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=1000 --threads=1 --max_key=320 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 1 Ops per thread : 1000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 320 Ratio #ops/#keys : 3 Num times DB reopens: 10 Batches/snapshots : 0 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 80 locks 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Starting database operations 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 4th time Created bg thread 0x7fc0f5bff700 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/03/04-15:58:17 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Starting verification Stress Test : 1836.258 micros/op 544 ops/sec : Wrote 0.01 MB (0.01 MB/sec) (59% of 1011 ops) : Wrote 605 times : Deleted 305 times : 50/90 gets found the key : Got errors 0 times 2013/03/04-15:58:18 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9081
12 years ago
if (!FLAGS_test_batches_snapshots) {
Status s = db_->Get(read_opts, key, &from_db);
if (s.ok()) {
// found case
thread->stats.AddGets(1, 1);
} else if (s.IsNotFound()) {
// not found case
thread->stats.AddGets(1, 0);
} else {
// errors case
thread->stats.AddErrors(1);
}
} else {
MultiGet(thread, read_opts, key, &from_db);
}
} else if ((int)FLAGS_readpercent <= prob_op && prob_op < prefixBound) {
// OPERATION prefix scan
// keys are longs (e.g., 8 bytes), so we let prefixes be
// everything except the last byte. So there will be 2^8=256
// keys per prefix.
Slice prefix = Slice(key.data(), key.size() - 1);
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
if (!FLAGS_test_batches_snapshots) {
read_opts.prefix = &prefix;
Iterator* iter = db_->NewIterator(read_opts);
int count = 0;
for (iter->SeekToFirst(); iter->Valid(); iter->Next()) {
assert(iter->key().starts_with(prefix));
count++;
}
assert(count <= 256);
if (iter->status().ok()) {
thread->stats.AddPrefixes(1, count);
} else {
thread->stats.AddErrors(1);
}
delete iter;
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
} else {
MultiPrefixScan(thread, read_opts, prefix);
}
} else if (prefixBound <= prob_op && prob_op < writeBound) {
// OPERATION write
uint32_t value_base = thread->rand.Next();
size_t sz = GenerateValue(value_base, value, sizeof(value));
Slice v(value, sz);
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
if (!FLAGS_test_batches_snapshots) {
MutexLock l(thread->shared->GetMutexForKey(rand_key));
if (FLAGS_verify_before_write) {
std::string keystr = Key(rand_key);
Slice k = keystr;
Status s = db_->Get(read_opts, k, &from_db);
VerifyValue(rand_key,
read_opts,
*(thread->shared),
from_db,
s,
true);
}
thread->shared->Put(rand_key, value_base);
if (FLAGS_use_merge_put) {
db_->Merge(write_opts, key, v);
} else {
db_->Put(write_opts, key, v);
}
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
thread->stats.AddBytesForWrites(1, sz);
} else {
MultiPut(thread, write_opts, key, v, sz);
}
PrintKeyValue(rand_key, value, sz);
} else if (writeBound <= prob_op && prob_op < delBound) {
// OPERATION delete
if (!FLAGS_test_batches_snapshots) {
MutexLock l(thread->shared->GetMutexForKey(rand_key));
thread->shared->Delete(rand_key);
db_->Delete(write_opts, key);
thread->stats.AddDeletes(1);
} else {
MultiDelete(thread, write_opts, key);
}
} else {
// OPERATION iterate
MultiIterate(thread, read_opts, key);
}
thread->stats.FinishedSingleOp();
}
thread->stats.Stop();
}
void VerifyDb(const SharedState &shared, long tid) const {
ReadOptions options(FLAGS_verify_checksum, true);
long max_key = shared.GetMaxKey();
static const long keys_per_thread = max_key / shared.GetNumThreads();
long start = keys_per_thread * tid;
long end = start + keys_per_thread;
if (tid == shared.GetNumThreads() - 1) {
end = max_key;
}
unique_ptr<Iterator> iter(db_->NewIterator(options));
iter->Seek(Key(start));
for (long i = start; i < end; i++) {
std::string from_db;
std::string keystr = Key(i);
Slice k = keystr;
Status s = iter->status();
if (iter->Valid()) {
if (iter->key().compare(k) > 0) {
s = Status::NotFound(Slice());
} else if (iter->key().compare(k) == 0) {
from_db = iter->value().ToString();
iter->Next();
} else if (iter->key().compare(k) < 0) {
VerificationAbort("An out of range key was found", i);
}
} else {
// The iterator found no value for the key in question, so do not
// move to the next item in the iterator
s = Status::NotFound(Slice());
}
VerifyValue(i, options, shared, from_db, s, true);
if (from_db.length()) {
PrintKeyValue(i, from_db.data(), from_db.length());
}
}
}
void VerificationAbort(std::string msg, long key) const {
fprintf(stderr, "Verification failed for key %ld: %s\n",
key, msg.c_str());
exit(1);
}
void VerifyValue(long key,
const ReadOptions &opts,
const SharedState &shared,
const std::string &value_from_db,
Status s,
bool strict=false) const {
// compare value_from_db with the value in the shared state
char value[100];
uint32_t value_base = shared.Get(key);
if (value_base == SharedState::SENTINEL && !strict) {
return;
}
if (s.ok()) {
if (value_base == SharedState::SENTINEL) {
VerificationAbort("Unexpected value found", key);
}
size_t sz = GenerateValue(value_base, value, sizeof(value));
if (value_from_db.length() != sz) {
VerificationAbort("Length of value read is not equal", key);
}
if (memcmp(value_from_db.data(), value, sz) != 0) {
VerificationAbort("Contents of value read don't match", key);
}
} else {
if (value_base != SharedState::SENTINEL) {
VerificationAbort("Value not found", key);
}
}
}
static void PrintKeyValue(uint32_t key, const char *value, size_t sz) {
if (!FLAGS_verbose) return;
fprintf(stdout, "%u ==> (%u) ", key, (unsigned int)sz);
for (size_t i=0; i<sz; i++) {
fprintf(stdout, "%X", value[i]);
}
fprintf(stdout, "\n");
}
static size_t GenerateValue(uint32_t rand, char *v, size_t max_sz) {
size_t value_sz = ((rand % 3) + 1) * FLAGS_value_size_mult;
assert(value_sz <= max_sz && value_sz >= sizeof(uint32_t));
*((uint32_t*)v) = rand;
for (size_t i=sizeof(uint32_t); i < value_sz; i++) {
v[i] = (char)(rand ^ i);
}
v[value_sz] = '\0';
return value_sz; // the size of the value set.
}
void PrintEnv() const {
fprintf(stdout, "LevelDB version : %d.%d\n",
kMajorVersion, kMinorVersion);
fprintf(stdout, "Number of threads : %d\n", FLAGS_threads);
fprintf(stdout, "Ops per thread : %d\n", FLAGS_ops_per_thread);
std::string ttl_state("unused");
if (FLAGS_ttl > 0) {
ttl_state = NumberToString(FLAGS_ttl);
}
fprintf(stdout, "Time to live(sec) : %s\n", ttl_state.c_str());
fprintf(stdout, "Read percentage : %d\n", FLAGS_readpercent);
fprintf(stdout, "Prefix percentage : %d\n", FLAGS_prefixpercent);
fprintf(stdout, "Write percentage : %d\n", FLAGS_writepercent);
fprintf(stdout, "Delete percentage : %d\n", FLAGS_delpercent);
fprintf(stdout, "Iterate percentage : %d\n", FLAGS_iterpercent);
fprintf(stdout, "Write-buffer-size : %d\n", FLAGS_write_buffer_size);
fprintf(stdout, "Iterations : %d\n", FLAGS_num_iterations);
fprintf(stdout, "Max key : %ld\n", FLAGS_max_key);
fprintf(stdout, "Ratio #ops/#keys : %f\n",
(1.0 * FLAGS_ops_per_thread * FLAGS_threads)/FLAGS_max_key);
fprintf(stdout, "Num times DB reopens: %d\n", FLAGS_reopen);
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
fprintf(stdout, "Batches/snapshots : %d\n",
FLAGS_test_batches_snapshots);
fprintf(stdout, "Purge redundant %% : %d\n",
FLAGS_purge_redundant_percent);
fprintf(stdout, "Deletes use filter : %d\n",
FLAGS_filter_deletes);
fprintf(stdout, "Num keys per lock : %d\n",
1 << FLAGS_log2_keys_per_lock);
const char* compression = "";
switch (FLAGS_compression_type) {
case leveldb::kNoCompression:
compression = "none";
break;
case leveldb::kSnappyCompression:
compression = "snappy";
break;
case leveldb::kZlibCompression:
compression = "zlib";
break;
case leveldb::kBZip2Compression:
compression = "bzip2";
break;
}
fprintf(stdout, "Compression : %s\n", compression);
const char* memtablerep = "";
switch (FLAGS_rep_factory) {
case kSkipList:
memtablerep = "skip_list";
break;
case kPrefixHash:
memtablerep = "prefix_hash";
break;
case kUnsorted:
memtablerep = "unsorted";
break;
case kVectorRep:
memtablerep = "vector";
break;
}
fprintf(stdout, "Memtablerep : %s\n", memtablerep);
fprintf(stdout, "------------------------------------------------\n");
}
void Open() {
assert(db_ == nullptr);
Options options;
options.block_cache = cache_;
options.write_buffer_size = FLAGS_write_buffer_size;
options.max_write_buffer_number = FLAGS_max_write_buffer_number;
options.min_write_buffer_number_to_merge =
FLAGS_min_write_buffer_number_to_merge;
options.max_background_compactions = FLAGS_max_background_compactions;
options.compaction_style = FLAGS_compaction_style;
options.block_size = FLAGS_block_size;
options.filter_policy = filter_policy_;
options.prefix_extractor = prefix_extractor_;
options.max_open_files = FLAGS_open_files;
options.statistics = dbstats;
options.env = FLAGS_env;
options.disableDataSync = FLAGS_disable_data_sync;
options.use_fsync = FLAGS_use_fsync;
options.allow_mmap_reads = FLAGS_use_mmap_reads;
[Kill randomly at various points in source code for testing] Summary: This is initial version. A few ways in which this could be extended in the future are: (a) Killing from more places in source code (b) Hashing stack and using that hash in determining whether to crash. This is to avoid crashing more often at source lines that are executed more often. (c) Raising exceptions or returning errors instead of killing Test Plan: This whole thing is for testing. Here is part of output: python2.7 tools/db_crashtest2.py -d 600 Running db_stress db_stress retncode -15 output LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000000 Read percentage : 50 Write-buffer-size : 4194304 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 1000 Ratio #ops/#keys : 320000 Num times DB reopens: 0 Batches/snapshots : 1 Purge redundant % : 50 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/04/26-17:55:17 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7fc1f07ff700 ... finished 60000 ops Running db_stress db_stress retncode -15 output LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000000 Read percentage : 50 Write-buffer-size : 4194304 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 1000 Ratio #ops/#keys : 320000 Num times DB reopens: 0 Batches/snapshots : 1 Purge redundant % : 50 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Created bg thread 0x7ff0137ff700 No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/04/26-17:56:15 Starting database operations ... finished 90000 ops Revert Plan: OK Task ID: #2252691 Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb, haobo Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D10581
12 years ago
leveldb_kill_odds = FLAGS_kill_random_test;
options.target_file_size_base = FLAGS_target_file_size_base;
options.target_file_size_multiplier = FLAGS_target_file_size_multiplier;
options.max_bytes_for_level_base = FLAGS_max_bytes_for_level_base;
options.max_bytes_for_level_multiplier =
FLAGS_max_bytes_for_level_multiplier;
options.level0_stop_writes_trigger = FLAGS_level0_stop_writes_trigger;
options.level0_slowdown_writes_trigger =
FLAGS_level0_slowdown_writes_trigger;
options.level0_file_num_compaction_trigger =
FLAGS_level0_file_num_compaction_trigger;
options.compression = FLAGS_compression_type;
options.create_if_missing = true;
options.disable_seek_compaction = FLAGS_disable_seek_compaction;
options.delete_obsolete_files_period_micros =
FLAGS_delete_obsolete_files_period_micros;
options.max_manifest_file_size = 1024;
options.filter_deletes = FLAGS_filter_deletes;
if ((FLAGS_prefix_size == 0) == (FLAGS_rep_factory == kPrefixHash)) {
fprintf(stderr,
"prefix_size should be non-zero iff memtablerep == prefix_hash\n");
exit(1);
}
switch (FLAGS_rep_factory) {
case kPrefixHash:
options.memtable_factory.reset(
new PrefixHashRepFactory(NewFixedPrefixTransform(FLAGS_prefix_size))
);
break;
case kUnsorted:
options.memtable_factory.reset(
new UnsortedRepFactory()
);
break;
case kSkipList:
// no need to do anything
break;
case kVectorRep:
options.memtable_factory.reset(
new VectorRepFactory()
);
break;
}
static Random purge_percent(1000); // no benefit from non-determinism here
if (purge_percent.Uniform(100) < FLAGS_purge_redundant_percent - 1) {
options.purge_redundant_kvs_while_flush = false;
}
if (FLAGS_use_merge_put) {
options.merge_operator = MergeOperators::CreatePutOperator();
}
// set universal style compaction configurations, if applicable
if (FLAGS_universal_size_ratio != 0) {
options.compaction_options_universal.size_ratio =
FLAGS_universal_size_ratio;
}
if (FLAGS_universal_min_merge_width != 0) {
options.compaction_options_universal.min_merge_width =
FLAGS_universal_min_merge_width;
}
if (FLAGS_universal_max_merge_width != 0) {
options.compaction_options_universal.max_merge_width =
FLAGS_universal_max_merge_width;
}
if (FLAGS_universal_max_size_amplification_percent != 0) {
options.compaction_options_universal.max_size_amplification_percent =
FLAGS_universal_max_size_amplification_percent;
}
fprintf(stdout, "DB path: [%s]\n", FLAGS_db);
Status s;
if (FLAGS_ttl == -1) {
s = DB::Open(options, FLAGS_db, &db_);
} else {
s = UtilityDB::OpenTtlDB(options, FLAGS_db, &sdb_, FLAGS_ttl);
db_ = sdb_;
}
if (!s.ok()) {
fprintf(stderr, "open error: %s\n", s.ToString().c_str());
exit(1);
}
}
void Reopen() {
// do not close the db. Just delete the lock file. This
// simulates a crash-recovery kind of situation.
if (FLAGS_ttl != -1) {
((DBWithTTL*) db_)->TEST_Destroy_DBWithTtl();
} else {
((DBImpl*) db_)->TEST_Destroy_DBImpl();
}
db_ = nullptr;
num_times_reopened_++;
double now = FLAGS_env->NowMicros();
fprintf(stdout, "%s Reopening database for the %dth time\n",
FLAGS_env->TimeToString((uint64_t) now/1000000).c_str(),
num_times_reopened_);
Open();
}
void PrintStatistics() {
if (dbstats) {
fprintf(stdout, "STATISTICS:\n%s\n", dbstats->ToString().c_str());
}
}
private:
shared_ptr<Cache> cache_;
const FilterPolicy* filter_policy_;
const SliceTransform* prefix_extractor_;
DB* db_;
StackableDB* sdb_;
int num_times_reopened_;
};
} // namespace leveldb
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
FLAGS_write_buffer_size = leveldb::Options().write_buffer_size;
FLAGS_max_write_buffer_number = leveldb::Options().max_write_buffer_number;
FLAGS_min_write_buffer_number_to_merge =
leveldb::Options().min_write_buffer_number_to_merge;
FLAGS_open_files = leveldb::Options().max_open_files;
FLAGS_max_background_compactions =
leveldb::Options().max_background_compactions;
FLAGS_compaction_style =
leveldb::Options().compaction_style;
FLAGS_level0_file_num_compaction_trigger =
leveldb::Options().level0_file_num_compaction_trigger;
FLAGS_level0_slowdown_writes_trigger =
leveldb::Options().level0_slowdown_writes_trigger;
FLAGS_level0_stop_writes_trigger =
leveldb::Options().level0_stop_writes_trigger;
// Compression test code above refers to FLAGS_block_size
FLAGS_block_size = leveldb::Options().block_size;
std::string default_db_path;
for (int i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
int n;
uint32_t u;
long l;
char junk;
char hdfsname[2048];
if (sscanf(argv[i], "--seed=%uf%c", &u, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_seed = u;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--max_key=%ld%c", &l, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_max_key = l;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--log2_keys_per_lock=%u%c", &u, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_log2_keys_per_lock = u;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--ops_per_thread=%u%c", &u, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_ops_per_thread = u;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--verbose=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n == 0 || n == 1)) {
FLAGS_verbose = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--histogram=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n == 0 || n == 1)) {
FLAGS_histogram = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--destroy_db_initially=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n == 0 || n == 1)) {
FLAGS_destroy_db_initially = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--verify_before_write=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n == 0 || n == 1)) {
FLAGS_verify_before_write = n;
[Add a second kind of verification to db_stress Summary: Currently the test tracks all writes in memory and uses it for verification at the end. This has 4 problems: (a) It needs mutex for each write to ensure in-memory update and leveldb update are done atomically. This slows down the benchmark. (b) Verification phase at the end is time consuming as well (c) Does not test batch writes or snapshots (d) We cannot kill the test and restart multiple times in a loop because in-memory state will be lost. I am adding a FLAGS_multi that does MultiGet/MultiPut/MultiDelete instead of get/put/delete to get/put/delete a group of related keys with same values atomically. Every get retrieves the group of keys and checks that their values are same. This does not have the above problems but the downside is that it does less amount of validation than the other approach. Test Plan: This whole this is a test! Here is a small run. I am doing larger run now. [nponnekanti@dev902 /data/users/nponnekanti/rocksdb] ./db_stress --ops_per_thread=10000 --multi=1 --ops_per_key=25 LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000 Read percentage : 10 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 2147483648 Num times DB reopens: 10 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Creating 536870912 locks 2013/02/20-16:59:32 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7f9ebcfff700 2013/02/20-16:59:37 Reopening database for the 1th time 2013/02/20-16:59:46 Reopening database for the 2th time 2013/02/20-16:59:57 Reopening database for the 3th time 2013/02/20-17:00:11 Reopening database for the 4th time 2013/02/20-17:00:25 Reopening database for the 5th time 2013/02/20-17:00:36 Reopening database for the 6th time 2013/02/20-17:00:47 Reopening database for the 7th time 2013/02/20-17:00:59 Reopening database for the 8th time 2013/02/20-17:01:10 Reopening database for the 9th time 2013/02/20-17:01:20 Reopening database for the 10th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Reopening database for the 11th time 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Starting verification Stress Test : 109.125 micros/op 22191 ops/sec : Wrote 0.00 MB (0.23 MB/sec) (59% of 32 ops) : Deleted 10 times 2013/02/20-17:01:31 Verification successful Revert Plan: OK Task ID: # Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D8733
12 years ago
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--test_batches_snapshots=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1
&& (n == 0 || n == 1)) {
FLAGS_test_batches_snapshots = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--threads=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_threads = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--ttl=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_ttl = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--value_size_mult=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_value_size_mult = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--write_buffer_size=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_write_buffer_size = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--max_write_buffer_number=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_max_write_buffer_number = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--min_write_buffer_number_to_merge=%d%c",
&n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_min_write_buffer_number_to_merge = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--max_background_compactions=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_max_background_compactions = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--compaction_style=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_compaction_style = (leveldb::CompactionStyle)n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--cache_size=%ld%c", &l, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_cache_size = l;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--block_size=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_block_size = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--reopen=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 && n >= 0) {
FLAGS_reopen = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--bloom_bits=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_bloom_bits = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--open_files=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_open_files = n;
} else if (strncmp(argv[i], "--db=", 5) == 0) {
FLAGS_db = argv[i] + 5;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--verify_checksum=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n == 0 || n == 1)) {
FLAGS_verify_checksum = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--mmap_read=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n == 0 || n == 1)) {
FLAGS_use_mmap_reads = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--statistics=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n == 0 || n == 1)) {
if (n == 1) {
dbstats = leveldb::CreateDBStatistics();
}
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--sync=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n == 0 || n == 1)) {
FLAGS_sync = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--readpercent=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n >= 0 && n <= 100)) {
FLAGS_readpercent = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--prefixpercent=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n >= 0 && n <= 100)) {
FLAGS_prefixpercent = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--writepercent=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n >= 0 && n <= 100)) {
FLAGS_writepercent = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--iterpercent=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n >= 0 && n <= 100)) {
FLAGS_iterpercent = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--delpercent=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n >= 0 && n <= 100)) {
FLAGS_delpercent = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--numiterations=%u%c", &u, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_num_iterations = u;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--disable_data_sync=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n == 0 || n == 1)) {
FLAGS_disable_data_sync = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--use_fsync=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n == 0 || n == 1)) {
FLAGS_use_fsync = n;
[Kill randomly at various points in source code for testing] Summary: This is initial version. A few ways in which this could be extended in the future are: (a) Killing from more places in source code (b) Hashing stack and using that hash in determining whether to crash. This is to avoid crashing more often at source lines that are executed more often. (c) Raising exceptions or returning errors instead of killing Test Plan: This whole thing is for testing. Here is part of output: python2.7 tools/db_crashtest2.py -d 600 Running db_stress db_stress retncode -15 output LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000000 Read percentage : 50 Write-buffer-size : 4194304 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 1000 Ratio #ops/#keys : 320000 Num times DB reopens: 0 Batches/snapshots : 1 Purge redundant % : 50 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/04/26-17:55:17 Starting database operations Created bg thread 0x7fc1f07ff700 ... finished 60000 ops Running db_stress db_stress retncode -15 output LevelDB version : 1.5 Number of threads : 32 Ops per thread : 10000000 Read percentage : 50 Write-buffer-size : 4194304 Delete percentage : 30 Max key : 1000 Ratio #ops/#keys : 320000 Num times DB reopens: 0 Batches/snapshots : 1 Purge redundant % : 50 Num keys per lock : 4 Compression : snappy ------------------------------------------------ Created bg thread 0x7ff0137ff700 No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set 2013/04/26-17:56:15 Starting database operations ... finished 90000 ops Revert Plan: OK Task ID: #2252691 Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke Reviewed By: emayanke CC: leveldb, haobo Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D10581
12 years ago
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--kill_random_test=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n >= 0)) {
FLAGS_kill_random_test = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--disable_wal=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
(n == 0 || n == 1)) {
FLAGS_disable_wal = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--hdfs=%s", hdfsname) == 1) {
FLAGS_env = new leveldb::HdfsEnv(hdfsname);
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--target_file_size_base=%d%c",
&n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_target_file_size_base = n;
} else if ( sscanf(argv[i], "--target_file_size_multiplier=%d%c",
&n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_target_file_size_multiplier = n;
} else if (
sscanf(argv[i], "--max_bytes_for_level_base=%ld%c", &l, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_max_bytes_for_level_base = l;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--max_bytes_for_level_multiplier=%d%c",
&n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_max_bytes_for_level_multiplier = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i],"--level0_stop_writes_trigger=%d%c",
&n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_level0_stop_writes_trigger = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i],"--level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=%d%c",
&n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_level0_slowdown_writes_trigger = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i],"--level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=%d%c",
&n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_level0_file_num_compaction_trigger = n;
} else if (strncmp(argv[i], "--compression_type=", 19) == 0) {
const char* ctype = argv[i] + 19;
if (!strcasecmp(ctype, "none"))
FLAGS_compression_type = leveldb::kNoCompression;
else if (!strcasecmp(ctype, "snappy"))
FLAGS_compression_type = leveldb::kSnappyCompression;
else if (!strcasecmp(ctype, "zlib"))
FLAGS_compression_type = leveldb::kZlibCompression;
else if (!strcasecmp(ctype, "bzip2"))
FLAGS_compression_type = leveldb::kBZip2Compression;
else {
fprintf(stdout, "Cannot parse %s\n", argv[i]);
}
} else if (strncmp(argv[i], "--memtablerep=", 14) == 0) {
const char* ctype = argv[i] + 14;
if (!strcasecmp(ctype, "skip_list"))
FLAGS_rep_factory = kSkipList;
else if (!strcasecmp(ctype, "prefix_hash"))
FLAGS_rep_factory = kPrefixHash;
else if (!strcasecmp(ctype, "unsorted"))
FLAGS_rep_factory = kUnsorted;
else if (!strcasecmp(ctype, "vector"))
FLAGS_rep_factory = kVectorRep;
else {
fprintf(stdout, "Cannot parse %s\n", argv[i]);
}
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--disable_seek_compaction=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1
&& (n == 0 || n == 1)) {
FLAGS_disable_seek_compaction = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--delete_obsolete_files_period_micros=%ld%c",
&l, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_delete_obsolete_files_period_micros = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--purge_redundant_percent=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1
&& (n >= 0 && n <= 100)) {
FLAGS_purge_redundant_percent = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--filter_deletes=%d%c", &n, &junk)
== 1 && (n == 0 || n == 1)) {
FLAGS_filter_deletes = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--prefix_size=%d%c", &n, &junk) == 1 &&
n >= 0 && n < 2000000000) {
FLAGS_prefix_size = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--use_merge=%d%c", &n, &junk)
== 1 && (n == 0 || n == 1)) {
FLAGS_use_merge_put = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--universal_size_ratio=%d%c",
&n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_universal_size_ratio = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--universal_min_merge_width=%d%c",
&n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_universal_min_merge_width = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i], "--universal_max_merge_width=%d%c",
&n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_universal_max_merge_width = n;
} else if (sscanf(argv[i],
"--universal_max_size_amplification_percent=%d%c",
&n, &junk) == 1) {
FLAGS_universal_max_size_amplification_percent = n;
} else {
fprintf(stderr, "Invalid flag '%s'\n", argv[i]);
exit(1);
}
}
// The number of background threads should be at least as much the
// max number of concurrent compactions.
FLAGS_env->SetBackgroundThreads(FLAGS_max_background_compactions);
if ((FLAGS_readpercent + FLAGS_prefixpercent +
FLAGS_writepercent + FLAGS_delpercent + FLAGS_iterpercent) != 100) {
fprintf(stderr,
"Error: Read+Prefix+Write+Delete+Iterate percents != 100!\n");
exit(1);
}
if (FLAGS_disable_wal == 1 && FLAGS_reopen > 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Error: Db cannot reopen safely with disable_wal set!\n");
exit(1);
}
if ((unsigned)FLAGS_reopen >= FLAGS_ops_per_thread) {
fprintf(stderr, "Error: #DB-reopens should be < ops_per_thread\n"
"Provided reopens = %d and ops_per_thread = %u\n", FLAGS_reopen,
FLAGS_ops_per_thread);
exit(1);
}
// Choose a location for the test database if none given with --db=<path>
if (FLAGS_db == nullptr) {
leveldb::Env::Default()->GetTestDirectory(&default_db_path);
default_db_path += "/dbstress";
FLAGS_db = default_db_path.c_str();
}
leveldb::StressTest stress;
stress.Run();
return 0;
}