You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
rocksdb/table/block_based/block_based_table_iterator.cc

383 lines
12 KiB

De-template block based table iterator (#6531) Summary: Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done: 1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them. 2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks. 3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them. This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531 Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release Differential Revision: D20473108 fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
4 years ago
// Copyright (c) 2011-present, Facebook, Inc. All rights reserved.
// This source code is licensed under both the GPLv2 (found in the
// COPYING file in the root directory) and Apache 2.0 License
// (found in the LICENSE.Apache file in the root directory).
//
// Copyright (c) 2011 The LevelDB Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file. See the AUTHORS file for names of contributors.
#include "table/block_based/block_based_table_iterator.h"
namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE {
void BlockBasedTableIterator::Seek(const Slice& target) { SeekImpl(&target); }
void BlockBasedTableIterator::SeekToFirst() { SeekImpl(nullptr); }
void BlockBasedTableIterator::SeekImpl(const Slice* target) {
is_out_of_bound_ = false;
is_at_first_key_from_index_ = false;
if (target && !CheckPrefixMayMatch(*target, IterDirection::kForward)) {
ResetDataIter();
return;
}
bool need_seek_index = true;
if (block_iter_points_to_real_block_ && block_iter_.Valid()) {
// Reseek.
prev_block_offset_ = index_iter_->value().handle.offset();
if (target) {
// We can avoid an index seek if:
// 1. The new seek key is larger than the current key
// 2. The new seek key is within the upper bound of the block
// Since we don't necessarily know the internal key for either
// the current key or the upper bound, we check user keys and
// exclude the equality case. Considering internal keys can
// improve for the boundary cases, but it would complicate the
// code.
if (user_comparator_.Compare(ExtractUserKey(*target),
block_iter_.user_key()) > 0 &&
user_comparator_.Compare(ExtractUserKey(*target),
index_iter_->user_key()) < 0) {
need_seek_index = false;
}
}
}
if (need_seek_index) {
if (target) {
index_iter_->Seek(*target);
} else {
index_iter_->SeekToFirst();
}
if (!index_iter_->Valid()) {
ResetDataIter();
return;
}
}
IndexValue v = index_iter_->value();
const bool same_block = block_iter_points_to_real_block_ &&
v.handle.offset() == prev_block_offset_;
if (!v.first_internal_key.empty() && !same_block &&
(!target || icomp_.Compare(*target, v.first_internal_key) <= 0) &&
Properly report IO errors when IndexType::kBinarySearchWithFirstKey is used (#6621) Summary: Context: Index type `kBinarySearchWithFirstKey` added the ability for sst file iterator to sometimes report a key from index without reading the corresponding data block. This is useful when sst blocks are cut at some meaningful boundaries (e.g. one block per key prefix), and many seeks land between blocks (e.g. for each prefix, the ranges of keys in different sst files are nearly disjoint, so a typical seek needs to read a data block from only one file even if all files have the prefix). But this added a new error condition, which rocksdb code was really not equipped to deal with: `InternalIterator::value()` may fail with an IO error or Status::Incomplete, but it's just a method returning a Slice, with no way to report error instead. Before this PR, this type of error wasn't handled at all (an empty slice was returned), and kBinarySearchWithFirstKey implementation was considered a prototype. Now that we (LogDevice) have experimented with kBinarySearchWithFirstKey for a while and confirmed that it's really useful, this PR is adding the missing error handling. It's a pretty inconvenient situation implementation-wise. The error needs to be reported from InternalIterator when trying to access value. But there are ~700 call sites of `InternalIterator::value()`, most of which either can't hit the error condition (because the iterator is reading from memtable or from index or something) or wouldn't benefit from the deferred loading of the value (e.g. compaction iterator that reads all values anyway). Adding error handling to all these call sites would needlessly bloat the code. So instead I made the deferred value loading optional: only the call sites that may use deferred loading have to call the new method `PrepareValue()` before calling `value()`. The feature is enabled with a new bool argument `allow_unprepared_value` to a bunch of methods that create iterators (it wouldn't make sense to put it in ReadOptions because it's completely internal to iterators, with virtually no user-visible effect). Lmk if you have better ideas. Note that the deferred value loading only happens for *internal* iterators. The user-visible iterator (DBIter) always prepares the value before returning from Seek/Next/etc. We could go further and add an API to defer that value loading too, but that's most likely not useful for LogDevice, so it doesn't seem worth the complexity for now. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6621 Test Plan: make -j5 check . Will also deploy to some logdevice test clusters and look at stats. Reviewed By: siying Differential Revision: D20786930 Pulled By: al13n321 fbshipit-source-id: 6da77d918bad3780522e918f17f4d5513d3e99ee
4 years ago
allow_unprepared_value_) {
De-template block based table iterator (#6531) Summary: Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done: 1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them. 2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks. 3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them. This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531 Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release Differential Revision: D20473108 fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
4 years ago
// Index contains the first key of the block, and it's >= target.
// We can defer reading the block.
is_at_first_key_from_index_ = true;
// ResetDataIter() will invalidate block_iter_. Thus, there is no need to
// call CheckDataBlockWithinUpperBound() to check for iterate_upper_bound
// as that will be done later when the data block is actually read.
ResetDataIter();
} else {
// Need to use the data block.
if (!same_block) {
InitDataBlock();
} else {
// When the user does a reseek, the iterate_upper_bound might have
// changed. CheckDataBlockWithinUpperBound() needs to be called
// explicitly if the reseek ends up in the same data block.
// If the reseek ends up in a different block, InitDataBlock() will do
// the iterator upper bound check.
CheckDataBlockWithinUpperBound();
}
if (target) {
block_iter_.Seek(*target);
} else {
block_iter_.SeekToFirst();
}
FindKeyForward();
}
CheckOutOfBound();
if (target) {
assert(!Valid() || icomp_.Compare(*target, key()) <= 0);
}
}
void BlockBasedTableIterator::SeekForPrev(const Slice& target) {
is_out_of_bound_ = false;
is_at_first_key_from_index_ = false;
// For now totally disable prefix seek in auto prefix mode because we don't
// have logic
if (!CheckPrefixMayMatch(target, IterDirection::kBackward)) {
ResetDataIter();
return;
}
SavePrevIndexValue();
// Call Seek() rather than SeekForPrev() in the index block, because the
// target data block will likely to contain the position for `target`, the
// same as Seek(), rather than than before.
// For example, if we have three data blocks, each containing two keys:
// [2, 4] [6, 8] [10, 12]
// (the keys in the index block would be [4, 8, 12])
// and the user calls SeekForPrev(7), we need to go to the second block,
// just like if they call Seek(7).
// The only case where the block is difference is when they seek to a position
// in the boundary. For example, if they SeekForPrev(5), we should go to the
// first block, rather than the second. However, we don't have the information
// to distinguish the two unless we read the second block. In this case, we'll
// end up with reading two blocks.
index_iter_->Seek(target);
if (!index_iter_->Valid()) {
auto seek_status = index_iter_->status();
// Check for IO error
if (!seek_status.IsNotFound() && !seek_status.ok()) {
ResetDataIter();
return;
}
// With prefix index, Seek() returns NotFound if the prefix doesn't exist
if (seek_status.IsNotFound()) {
// Any key less than the target is fine for prefix seek
ResetDataIter();
return;
} else {
index_iter_->SeekToLast();
}
// Check for IO error
if (!index_iter_->Valid()) {
ResetDataIter();
return;
}
}
InitDataBlock();
block_iter_.SeekForPrev(target);
FindKeyBackward();
CheckDataBlockWithinUpperBound();
assert(!block_iter_.Valid() ||
icomp_.Compare(target, block_iter_.key()) >= 0);
}
void BlockBasedTableIterator::SeekToLast() {
is_out_of_bound_ = false;
is_at_first_key_from_index_ = false;
SavePrevIndexValue();
index_iter_->SeekToLast();
if (!index_iter_->Valid()) {
ResetDataIter();
return;
}
InitDataBlock();
block_iter_.SeekToLast();
FindKeyBackward();
CheckDataBlockWithinUpperBound();
}
void BlockBasedTableIterator::Next() {
if (is_at_first_key_from_index_ && !MaterializeCurrentBlock()) {
return;
}
assert(block_iter_points_to_real_block_);
block_iter_.Next();
FindKeyForward();
CheckOutOfBound();
}
bool BlockBasedTableIterator::NextAndGetResult(IterateResult* result) {
Next();
bool is_valid = Valid();
if (is_valid) {
result->key = key();
result->bound_check_result = UpperBoundCheckResult();
Properly report IO errors when IndexType::kBinarySearchWithFirstKey is used (#6621) Summary: Context: Index type `kBinarySearchWithFirstKey` added the ability for sst file iterator to sometimes report a key from index without reading the corresponding data block. This is useful when sst blocks are cut at some meaningful boundaries (e.g. one block per key prefix), and many seeks land between blocks (e.g. for each prefix, the ranges of keys in different sst files are nearly disjoint, so a typical seek needs to read a data block from only one file even if all files have the prefix). But this added a new error condition, which rocksdb code was really not equipped to deal with: `InternalIterator::value()` may fail with an IO error or Status::Incomplete, but it's just a method returning a Slice, with no way to report error instead. Before this PR, this type of error wasn't handled at all (an empty slice was returned), and kBinarySearchWithFirstKey implementation was considered a prototype. Now that we (LogDevice) have experimented with kBinarySearchWithFirstKey for a while and confirmed that it's really useful, this PR is adding the missing error handling. It's a pretty inconvenient situation implementation-wise. The error needs to be reported from InternalIterator when trying to access value. But there are ~700 call sites of `InternalIterator::value()`, most of which either can't hit the error condition (because the iterator is reading from memtable or from index or something) or wouldn't benefit from the deferred loading of the value (e.g. compaction iterator that reads all values anyway). Adding error handling to all these call sites would needlessly bloat the code. So instead I made the deferred value loading optional: only the call sites that may use deferred loading have to call the new method `PrepareValue()` before calling `value()`. The feature is enabled with a new bool argument `allow_unprepared_value` to a bunch of methods that create iterators (it wouldn't make sense to put it in ReadOptions because it's completely internal to iterators, with virtually no user-visible effect). Lmk if you have better ideas. Note that the deferred value loading only happens for *internal* iterators. The user-visible iterator (DBIter) always prepares the value before returning from Seek/Next/etc. We could go further and add an API to defer that value loading too, but that's most likely not useful for LogDevice, so it doesn't seem worth the complexity for now. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6621 Test Plan: make -j5 check . Will also deploy to some logdevice test clusters and look at stats. Reviewed By: siying Differential Revision: D20786930 Pulled By: al13n321 fbshipit-source-id: 6da77d918bad3780522e918f17f4d5513d3e99ee
4 years ago
result->value_prepared = !is_at_first_key_from_index_;
De-template block based table iterator (#6531) Summary: Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done: 1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them. 2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks. 3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them. This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531 Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release Differential Revision: D20473108 fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
4 years ago
}
return is_valid;
}
void BlockBasedTableIterator::Prev() {
if (is_at_first_key_from_index_) {
is_at_first_key_from_index_ = false;
index_iter_->Prev();
if (!index_iter_->Valid()) {
return;
}
InitDataBlock();
block_iter_.SeekToLast();
} else {
assert(block_iter_points_to_real_block_);
block_iter_.Prev();
}
FindKeyBackward();
}
void BlockBasedTableIterator::InitDataBlock() {
BlockHandle data_block_handle = index_iter_->value().handle;
if (!block_iter_points_to_real_block_ ||
data_block_handle.offset() != prev_block_offset_ ||
// if previous attempt of reading the block missed cache, try again
block_iter_.status().IsIncomplete()) {
if (block_iter_points_to_real_block_) {
ResetDataIter();
}
auto* rep = table_->get_rep();
bool is_for_compaction =
lookup_context_.caller == TableReaderCaller::kCompaction;
// Prefetch additional data for range scans (iterators).
// Implicit auto readahead:
// Enabled after 2 sequential IOs when ReadOptions.readahead_size == 0.
// Explicit user requested readahead:
// Enabled from the very first IO when ReadOptions.readahead_size is set.
Provide implementation to prefetch data asynchronously in FilePrefetchBuffer (#9674) Summary: In FilePrefetchBuffer if reads are sequential, after prefetching call ReadAsync API to prefetch data asynchronously so that in next prefetching data will be available. Data prefetched asynchronously will be readahead_size/2. It uses two buffers, one for synchronous prefetching and one for asynchronous. In case, the data is overlapping, the data is copied from both buffers to third buffer to make it continuous. This feature is under ReadOptions::async_io and is under experimental. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9674 Test Plan: 1. Add new unit tests 2. Run **db_stress** to make sure nothing crashes. - Normal prefetch without `async_io` ran successfully: ``` export CRASH_TEST_EXT_ARGS=" --async_io=0" make crash_test -j ``` 3. **Run Regressions**. i) Main branch without any change for normal prefetching with async_io disabled: ``` ./db_bench -db=/tmp/prefix_scan_prefetch_main -benchmarks="fillseq" -key_size=32 -value_size=512 -num=5000000 - use_direct_io_for_flush_and_compaction=true -target_file_size_base=16777216 ``` ``` ./db_bench -use_existing_db=true -db=/tmp/prefix_scan_prefetch_main -benchmarks="seekrandom" -key_size=32 -value_size=512 -num=5000000 -use_direct_reads=true -seek_nexts=327680 -duration=120 -ops_between_duration_checks=1 Initializing RocksDB Options from the specified file Initializing RocksDB Options from command-line flags RocksDB: version 7.0 Date: Thu Mar 17 13:11:34 2022 CPU: 24 * Intel Core Processor (Broadwell) CPUCache: 16384 KB Keys: 32 bytes each (+ 0 bytes user-defined timestamp) Values: 512 bytes each (256 bytes after compression) Entries: 5000000 Prefix: 0 bytes Keys per prefix: 0 RawSize: 2594.0 MB (estimated) FileSize: 1373.3 MB (estimated) Write rate: 0 bytes/second Read rate: 0 ops/second Compression: Snappy Compression sampling rate: 0 Memtablerep: SkipListFactory Perf Level: 1 ------------------------------------------------ DB path: [/tmp/prefix_scan_prefetch_main] seekrandom : 483618.390 micros/op 2 ops/sec; 338.9 MB/s (249 of 249 found) ``` ii) normal prefetching after changes with async_io disable: ``` ./db_bench -use_existing_db=true -db=/tmp/prefix_scan_prefetch_withchange -benchmarks="seekrandom" -key_size=32 -value_size=512 -num=5000000 -use_direct_reads=true -seek_nexts=327680 -duration=120 -ops_between_duration_checks=1 Initializing RocksDB Options from the specified file Initializing RocksDB Options from command-line flags RocksDB: version 7.0 Date: Thu Mar 17 14:11:31 2022 CPU: 24 * Intel Core Processor (Broadwell) CPUCache: 16384 KB Keys: 32 bytes each (+ 0 bytes user-defined timestamp) Values: 512 bytes each (256 bytes after compression) Entries: 5000000 Prefix: 0 bytes Keys per prefix: 0 RawSize: 2594.0 MB (estimated) FileSize: 1373.3 MB (estimated) Write rate: 0 bytes/second Read rate: 0 ops/second Compression: Snappy Compression sampling rate: 0 Memtablerep: SkipListFactory Perf Level: 1 ------------------------------------------------ DB path: [/tmp/prefix_scan_prefetch_withchange] seekrandom : 471347.227 micros/op 2 ops/sec; 348.1 MB/s (255 of 255 found) ``` Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D34731543 Pulled By: akankshamahajan15 fbshipit-source-id: 8e23aa93453d5fe3c672b9231ad582f60207937f
2 years ago
block_prefetcher_.PrefetchIfNeeded(
rep, data_block_handle, read_options_.readahead_size, is_for_compaction,
read_options_.async_io);
De-template block based table iterator (#6531) Summary: Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done: 1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them. 2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks. 3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them. This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531 Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release Differential Revision: D20473108 fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
4 years ago
Status s;
table_->NewDataBlockIterator<DataBlockIter>(
read_options_, data_block_handle, &block_iter_, BlockType::kData,
/*get_context=*/nullptr, &lookup_context_, s,
block_prefetcher_.prefetch_buffer(),
/*for_compaction=*/is_for_compaction);
block_iter_points_to_real_block_ = true;
CheckDataBlockWithinUpperBound();
}
}
bool BlockBasedTableIterator::MaterializeCurrentBlock() {
assert(is_at_first_key_from_index_);
assert(!block_iter_points_to_real_block_);
assert(index_iter_->Valid());
is_at_first_key_from_index_ = false;
InitDataBlock();
assert(block_iter_points_to_real_block_);
Properly report IO errors when IndexType::kBinarySearchWithFirstKey is used (#6621) Summary: Context: Index type `kBinarySearchWithFirstKey` added the ability for sst file iterator to sometimes report a key from index without reading the corresponding data block. This is useful when sst blocks are cut at some meaningful boundaries (e.g. one block per key prefix), and many seeks land between blocks (e.g. for each prefix, the ranges of keys in different sst files are nearly disjoint, so a typical seek needs to read a data block from only one file even if all files have the prefix). But this added a new error condition, which rocksdb code was really not equipped to deal with: `InternalIterator::value()` may fail with an IO error or Status::Incomplete, but it's just a method returning a Slice, with no way to report error instead. Before this PR, this type of error wasn't handled at all (an empty slice was returned), and kBinarySearchWithFirstKey implementation was considered a prototype. Now that we (LogDevice) have experimented with kBinarySearchWithFirstKey for a while and confirmed that it's really useful, this PR is adding the missing error handling. It's a pretty inconvenient situation implementation-wise. The error needs to be reported from InternalIterator when trying to access value. But there are ~700 call sites of `InternalIterator::value()`, most of which either can't hit the error condition (because the iterator is reading from memtable or from index or something) or wouldn't benefit from the deferred loading of the value (e.g. compaction iterator that reads all values anyway). Adding error handling to all these call sites would needlessly bloat the code. So instead I made the deferred value loading optional: only the call sites that may use deferred loading have to call the new method `PrepareValue()` before calling `value()`. The feature is enabled with a new bool argument `allow_unprepared_value` to a bunch of methods that create iterators (it wouldn't make sense to put it in ReadOptions because it's completely internal to iterators, with virtually no user-visible effect). Lmk if you have better ideas. Note that the deferred value loading only happens for *internal* iterators. The user-visible iterator (DBIter) always prepares the value before returning from Seek/Next/etc. We could go further and add an API to defer that value loading too, but that's most likely not useful for LogDevice, so it doesn't seem worth the complexity for now. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6621 Test Plan: make -j5 check . Will also deploy to some logdevice test clusters and look at stats. Reviewed By: siying Differential Revision: D20786930 Pulled By: al13n321 fbshipit-source-id: 6da77d918bad3780522e918f17f4d5513d3e99ee
4 years ago
if (!block_iter_.status().ok()) {
return false;
}
De-template block based table iterator (#6531) Summary: Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done: 1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them. 2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks. 3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them. This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531 Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release Differential Revision: D20473108 fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
4 years ago
block_iter_.SeekToFirst();
if (!block_iter_.Valid() ||
icomp_.Compare(block_iter_.key(),
index_iter_->value().first_internal_key) != 0) {
block_iter_.Invalidate(Status::Corruption(
"first key in index doesn't match first key in block"));
return false;
}
return true;
}
void BlockBasedTableIterator::FindKeyForward() {
// This method's code is kept short to make it likely to be inlined.
assert(!is_out_of_bound_);
assert(block_iter_points_to_real_block_);
if (!block_iter_.Valid()) {
// This is the only call site of FindBlockForward(), but it's extracted into
// a separate method to keep FindKeyForward() short and likely to be
// inlined. When transitioning to a different block, we call
// FindBlockForward(), which is much longer and is probably not inlined.
FindBlockForward();
} else {
// This is the fast path that avoids a function call.
}
}
void BlockBasedTableIterator::FindBlockForward() {
// TODO the while loop inherits from two-level-iterator. We don't know
// whether a block can be empty so it can be replaced by an "if".
do {
if (!block_iter_.status().ok()) {
return;
}
// Whether next data block is out of upper bound, if there is one.
const bool next_block_is_out_of_bound =
read_options_.iterate_upper_bound != nullptr &&
block_iter_points_to_real_block_ &&
block_upper_bound_check_ == BlockUpperBound::kUpperBoundInCurBlock;
De-template block based table iterator (#6531) Summary: Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done: 1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them. 2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks. 3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them. This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531 Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release Differential Revision: D20473108 fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
4 years ago
assert(!next_block_is_out_of_bound ||
user_comparator_.CompareWithoutTimestamp(
*read_options_.iterate_upper_bound, /*a_has_ts=*/false,
index_iter_->user_key(), /*b_has_ts=*/true) <= 0);
ResetDataIter();
index_iter_->Next();
if (next_block_is_out_of_bound) {
// The next block is out of bound. No need to read it.
TEST_SYNC_POINT_CALLBACK("BlockBasedTableIterator:out_of_bound", nullptr);
// We need to make sure this is not the last data block before setting
// is_out_of_bound_, since the index key for the last data block can be
// larger than smallest key of the next file on the same level.
if (index_iter_->Valid()) {
is_out_of_bound_ = true;
}
return;
}
if (!index_iter_->Valid()) {
return;
}
IndexValue v = index_iter_->value();
Properly report IO errors when IndexType::kBinarySearchWithFirstKey is used (#6621) Summary: Context: Index type `kBinarySearchWithFirstKey` added the ability for sst file iterator to sometimes report a key from index without reading the corresponding data block. This is useful when sst blocks are cut at some meaningful boundaries (e.g. one block per key prefix), and many seeks land between blocks (e.g. for each prefix, the ranges of keys in different sst files are nearly disjoint, so a typical seek needs to read a data block from only one file even if all files have the prefix). But this added a new error condition, which rocksdb code was really not equipped to deal with: `InternalIterator::value()` may fail with an IO error or Status::Incomplete, but it's just a method returning a Slice, with no way to report error instead. Before this PR, this type of error wasn't handled at all (an empty slice was returned), and kBinarySearchWithFirstKey implementation was considered a prototype. Now that we (LogDevice) have experimented with kBinarySearchWithFirstKey for a while and confirmed that it's really useful, this PR is adding the missing error handling. It's a pretty inconvenient situation implementation-wise. The error needs to be reported from InternalIterator when trying to access value. But there are ~700 call sites of `InternalIterator::value()`, most of which either can't hit the error condition (because the iterator is reading from memtable or from index or something) or wouldn't benefit from the deferred loading of the value (e.g. compaction iterator that reads all values anyway). Adding error handling to all these call sites would needlessly bloat the code. So instead I made the deferred value loading optional: only the call sites that may use deferred loading have to call the new method `PrepareValue()` before calling `value()`. The feature is enabled with a new bool argument `allow_unprepared_value` to a bunch of methods that create iterators (it wouldn't make sense to put it in ReadOptions because it's completely internal to iterators, with virtually no user-visible effect). Lmk if you have better ideas. Note that the deferred value loading only happens for *internal* iterators. The user-visible iterator (DBIter) always prepares the value before returning from Seek/Next/etc. We could go further and add an API to defer that value loading too, but that's most likely not useful for LogDevice, so it doesn't seem worth the complexity for now. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6621 Test Plan: make -j5 check . Will also deploy to some logdevice test clusters and look at stats. Reviewed By: siying Differential Revision: D20786930 Pulled By: al13n321 fbshipit-source-id: 6da77d918bad3780522e918f17f4d5513d3e99ee
4 years ago
if (!v.first_internal_key.empty() && allow_unprepared_value_) {
De-template block based table iterator (#6531) Summary: Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done: 1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them. 2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks. 3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them. This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531 Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release Differential Revision: D20473108 fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
4 years ago
// Index contains the first key of the block. Defer reading the block.
is_at_first_key_from_index_ = true;
return;
}
InitDataBlock();
block_iter_.SeekToFirst();
} while (!block_iter_.Valid());
}
void BlockBasedTableIterator::FindKeyBackward() {
while (!block_iter_.Valid()) {
if (!block_iter_.status().ok()) {
return;
}
ResetDataIter();
index_iter_->Prev();
if (index_iter_->Valid()) {
InitDataBlock();
block_iter_.SeekToLast();
} else {
return;
}
}
// We could have check lower bound here too, but we opt not to do it for
// code simplicity.
}
void BlockBasedTableIterator::CheckOutOfBound() {
if (read_options_.iterate_upper_bound != nullptr &&
block_upper_bound_check_ != BlockUpperBound::kUpperBoundBeyondCurBlock &&
Valid()) {
De-template block based table iterator (#6531) Summary: Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done: 1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them. 2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks. 3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them. This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531 Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release Differential Revision: D20473108 fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
4 years ago
is_out_of_bound_ =
user_comparator_.CompareWithoutTimestamp(
*read_options_.iterate_upper_bound, /*a_has_ts=*/false, user_key(),
/*b_has_ts=*/true) <= 0;
}
}
void BlockBasedTableIterator::CheckDataBlockWithinUpperBound() {
if (read_options_.iterate_upper_bound != nullptr &&
block_iter_points_to_real_block_) {
block_upper_bound_check_ = (user_comparator_.CompareWithoutTimestamp(
*read_options_.iterate_upper_bound,
/*a_has_ts=*/false, index_iter_->user_key(),
/*b_has_ts=*/true) > 0)
? BlockUpperBound::kUpperBoundBeyondCurBlock
: BlockUpperBound::kUpperBoundInCurBlock;
De-template block based table iterator (#6531) Summary: Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done: 1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them. 2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks. 3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them. This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531 Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release Differential Revision: D20473108 fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
4 years ago
}
}
} // namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE