|
|
|
@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, WriteConflictTest) { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This Put outside of a transaction will conflict with the previous write
|
|
|
|
|
s = db->Put(write_options, "foo", "xxx"); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(s); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsTimedOut()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = db->Get(read_options, "foo", &value); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(value, "A"); |
|
|
|
@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, WriteConflictTest2) { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn->Put("foo", |
|
|
|
|
"bar2"); // Conflicts with write done after snapshot taken
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(s); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsBusy()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn->Put("foo3", "Y"); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, ReadConflictTest) { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This Put outside of a transaction will conflict with the previous read
|
|
|
|
|
s = db->Put(write_options, "foo", "barz"); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(s); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsTimedOut()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = db->Get(read_options, "foo", &value); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(value, "bar"); |
|
|
|
@ -305,8 +305,8 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, FlushTest2) { |
|
|
|
|
db->Flush(flush_ops); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn->Put("X", "Y"); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(s); // Put should fail since MemTableList History is not older
|
|
|
|
|
// than snapshot.
|
|
|
|
|
// Put should fail since MemTableList History is not older than the snapshot.
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsTryAgain()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn->Commit(); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, MultipleSnapshotTest) { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This will conflict since the snapshot is earlier than another write to ZZZ
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Put("ZZZ", "xxxxx"); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(s); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsBusy()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Commit(); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, ColumnFamiliesTest) { |
|
|
|
|
// This write will cause a conflict with the earlier batch write
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Put(handles[1], SliceParts(key_slices, 3), |
|
|
|
|
SliceParts(&value_slice, 1)); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(s); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsBusy()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Commit(); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
@ -608,10 +608,10 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, ColumnFamiliesTest) { |
|
|
|
|
results = txn2->MultiGetForUpdate(snapshot_read_options, multiget_cfh, |
|
|
|
|
multiget_keys, &values); |
|
|
|
|
// All results should fail since there was a conflict
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(results[0]); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(results[1]); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(results[2]); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(results[3]); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(results[0].IsBusy()); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(results[1].IsBusy()); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(results[2].IsBusy()); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(results[3].IsBusy()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = db->Get(read_options, handles[2], "foo", &value); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(value, "000"); |
|
|
|
@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, ColumnFamiliesTest2) { |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Put(one, "X", "11"); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsBusy()); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsTimedOut()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn1->Commit(); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, EmptyTest) { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Conflicts with previous GetForUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
s = db->Put(write_options, "aaa", "xxx"); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(s); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsTimedOut()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// transaction expired!
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn->Commit(); |
|
|
|
@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, PredicateManyPreceders) { |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(results[1].IsNotFound()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Put("2", "x"); // Conflict's with txn1's MultiGetForUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(s); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsTimedOut()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
txn2->Rollback(); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, PredicateManyPreceders) { |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Delete("4"); // conflict
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(s); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsTimedOut()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn1->Commit(); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, LostUpdate) { |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Put("1", "2"); // conflict
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(s); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsTimedOut()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Commit(); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, LostUpdate) { |
|
|
|
|
s = txn1->Put("1", "3"); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Put("1", "4"); // conflict
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(s); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsTimedOut()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn1->Commit(); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, LostUpdate) { |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Put("1", "6"); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(s); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsBusy()); |
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Commit(); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, UntrackedWrites) { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Conflict
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn->Put("untracked", "3"); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(s); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsBusy()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn->Commit(); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, ExpiredTransaction) { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// txn1 should fail to commit since it is expired
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn1->Commit(); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsTimedOut()); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsExpired()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = db->Get(read_options, "Y", &value); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsNotFound()); |
|
|
|
@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, Rollback) { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// txn2 should not be able to write to X since txn1 has it locked
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Put("X", "2"); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsBusy()); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsTimedOut()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
txn1->Rollback(); |
|
|
|
|
delete txn1; |
|
|
|
@ -1117,9 +1117,9 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, LockLimitTest) { |
|
|
|
|
Transaction* txn2 = db->BeginTransaction(write_options); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(txn2); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// lock limit reached
|
|
|
|
|
// "X" currently locked
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Put("X", "x"); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsBusy()); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsTimedOut()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// lock limit reached
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Put("M", "m"); |
|
|
|
@ -1483,7 +1483,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, TimeoutTest) { |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn1->Commit(); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_NOK(s); // expired!
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsExpired()); // expired!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = db->Get(read_options, "aaa", &value); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
@ -1542,9 +1542,9 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, TimeoutTest) { |
|
|
|
|
s = txn1->Commit(); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// txn2 should be timed out since txn1 waiting until its timeout expired.
|
|
|
|
|
// txn2 should be expired out since txn1 waiting until its timeout expired.
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Commit(); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsTimedOut()); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsExpired()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
delete txn1; |
|
|
|
|
delete txn2; |
|
|
|
@ -1558,7 +1558,7 @@ TEST_F(TransactionTest, TimeoutTest) { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// txn2 has a smaller lock timeout than txn1's expiration, so it will time out
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn2->Delete("asdf"); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsBusy()); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsTimedOut()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = txn1->Commit(); |
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_OK(s); |
|
|
|
|