Revise LockWAL/UnlockWAL implementation (#11020)
Summary: RocksDB has two public APIs: `DB::LockWAL()`/`DB::UnlockWAL()`. The current implementation acquires and releases the internal `DBImpl::log_write_mutex_`. According to the comment on `DBImpl::log_write_mutex_`: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/7.8.fb/db/db_impl/db_impl.h#L2287:L2288 > Note: to avoid dealock, if needed to acquire both log_write_mutex_ and mutex_, the order should be first mutex_ and then log_write_mutex_. This puts limitations on how applications can use the `LockWAL()` API. After `LockWAL()` returns ok, then application should not perform any operation that acquires `mutex_`. Currently, the use case of `LockWAL()` is MyRocks implementing the MySQL storage engine handlerton `lock_hton_log` interface. The operation that MyRocks performs after `LockWAL()` is `GetSortedWalFiless()` which not only acquires mutex_, but also `log_write_mutex_`. There are two issues: 1. Applications using these two APIs may hang if one thread calls `GetSortedWalFiles()` after calling `LockWAL()` because log_write_mutex is not recursive. 2. Two threads may dead lock due to lock order inversion. To fix these issues, we can modify the implementation of LockWAL so that it does not keep `log_write_mutex_` held until UnlockWAL. To achieve the goal of locking the WAL, we can instead manually inject a write stall so that all future writes will be stopped. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11020 Test Plan: make check Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D41785203 Pulled By: riversand963 fbshipit-source-id: 5ccb7a9c6eb9a2c3fa80fd2c399cc2568b8f89cemain
parent
98d5db5c2e
commit
c93ba7db5d
Loading…
Reference in new issue