Make TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAcces less flaky (#9281)
Summary: Context: [Rapid thread creation and deletion](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/6.27.fb/utilities/transactions/write_prepared_transaction_test.cc#L439-L444) in `SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAcces` inside a [potentially big loop](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/6.27.fb/utilities/transactions/write_prepared_transaction_test.cc#L1238-L1248) can lead to heavy-loading the system with many threads due to delay in actually cleaning up thread's resource in the kernel sometime. We ran into some [flaky failure](https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/facebook/rocksdb/10383/workflows/136f1005-80a9-4515-aee9-fe36ac6462a1/jobs/253289) in CI and reproduced it by below: - Command ``` Added `ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::port::InstallStackTraceHandler();` like https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9276 DEBUG_LEVEL=2 make -j56 write_prepared_transaction_test GTEST_CATCH_EXCEPTIONS=0 ~/gtest-parallel/gtest-parallel -r 200 -w 200 ./write_prepared_transaction_test --gtest_filter=TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 ``` - Stack, where `write_prepared_transaction_test.cc:442` in `https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/9` points to thread creation ``` [ RUN ] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 ....terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error' what(): Resource temporarily unavailable Received signal 6 (Aborted) #0 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x38) [0x7fc114f39438] ... https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6(+0xb8e73) [0x7fc1158a5e73] ?? ??:0 https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8 ./write_prepared_transaction_test() [0x4ca86c] std:🧵:thread<rocksdb::WritePreparedTransactionTestBase::SnapshotConcurrentAccessTestInternal(rocksdb::WritePreparedTxnDB*, std::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> > const&, std::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> const&, rocksdb::WritePreparedTxnDB::CommitEntry&, unsigned long&, unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long)::{lambda()https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/1}>(rocksdb::WritePreparedTransactionTestBase::SnapshotConcurrentAccessTestInternal(rocksdb::WritePreparedTxnDB*, s d::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> > const&, std::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> > const&, rocksdb::WritePreparedTxnDB::CommitEntry&, unsigned long&, unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long)::{l mbda()https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/1}&&) /usr/include/c++/5/thread:137 (discriminator 4) https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/9 ./write_prepared_transaction_test() [0x4bb80c] rocksdb::WritePreparedTransactionTestBase::SnapshotConcurrentAccessTestInternal(rocksdb::WritePreparedTxnDB*, std::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> > const&, std::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> > const&, rocksdb::W itePreparedTxnDB::CommitEntry&, unsigned long&, unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long) /home/circleci/project/utilities/transactions/write_prepared_transaction_test.cc:442 https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10 ./write_prepared_transaction_test() [0x4407b6] rocksdb::SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest_SnapshotConcurrentAccess_Test::TestBody() /home/circleci/project/utilities/transactions/write_prepared_transaction_test.cc:1244 ... [109/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 returned/aborted with exit code -6 (34462 ms) ``` - Move thread 2's work into current thread to avoid half of the thread creation cuz there is no difference in doing so. We expect this can make the thread-creation error less often, even though we can't gurantee it from happening again. Considering this is a trivial change with positive impact, it's still worth landing and monitor if it's enough to solve the problem in reality. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9281 Test Plan: Before the change, repeating the test 200 times with 200 workers failed `~/gtest-parallel/gtest-parallel -r 200 -w 200 ./write_prepared_transaction_test --gtest_filter=TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1` ``` [==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case. [----------] Global test environment set-up. [----------] 1 test from TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest [ RUN ] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 ..unknown file: Failure C++ exception with description "Resource temporarily unavailable" thrown in the test body. [ FAILED ] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1, where GetParam() = (false, true, 1, 0, 1, 20) (11882 ms) [----------] 1 test from TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest (11882 ms total) [----------] Global test environment tear-down [==========] 1 test from 1 test case ran. (11882 ms total) [ PASSED ] 0 tests. [ FAILED ] 1 test, listed below: [ FAILED ] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1, where GetParam() = (false, true, 1, 0, 1, 20) ``` After the change: repeating the test 200 times with 200 workers didn't fail, even with repeating the "repeating" for 10 times like below `for i in {1..10}; do ~/gtest-parallel/gtest-parallel -r 200 -w 200 ./write_prepared_transaction_test --gtest_filter=TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1; done` ``` [200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 [200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 [200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 [200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 [200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 [200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 [200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 [200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 [200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 [200/200] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 ``` It does failed when repeating the test 400 times with 400 workers `~/project$ ~/gtest-parallel/gtest-parallel -r 400 -w 400 ./write_prepared_transaction_test --gtest_filter=TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1` ``` [1/400] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 (2928 ms) Note: Google Test filter = TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 [==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case. [----------] Global test environment set-up. [----------] 1 test from TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest [ RUN ] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1 unknown file: Failure C++ exception with description "std::bad_alloc" thrown in the test body. [ FAILED ] TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest.SnapshotConcurrentAccess/1, where GetParam() = (false, true, 1, 0, 1, 20) (2597 ms) [----------] 1 test from TwoWriteQueues/SnapshotConcurrentAccessTest (2597 ms total) ``` Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D33026776 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 509f57126392821e835e48396e5bf224f4f5dcacmain
parent
bd513fd075
commit
cd85439632
Loading…
Reference in new issue