Refactor WriteUnpreparedStressTest to be a unit test (#11424)

Summary:
This patch remove the "stress" aspect from the WriteUnpreparedStressTest and leave it to be a unit test for some correctness testing w.r.t. snapshot functionality. I added some read-your-write verification to the transaction test in db_stress.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11424

Test Plan:
`./write_unprepared_transaction_test`
`./db_crashtest.py whitebox --txn`
`./db_crashtest.py blackbox --txn`

Reviewed By: hx235

Differential Revision: D45551521

Pulled By: jowlyzhang

fbshipit-source-id: 20c3d510eb4255b08ddd7b6c85bdb4945436f6e8
oxigraph-main
Yu Zhang 2 years ago committed by Facebook GitHub Bot
parent 5b945adf60
commit ffb5f1f445
  1. 2
      db_stress_tool/expected_value.h
  2. 140
      db_stress_tool/no_batched_ops_stress.cc
  3. 145
      utilities/transactions/write_unprepared_transaction_test.cc

@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ class ExpectedValue {
return IsValuePartValid(value_base, VALUE_BASE_MASK);
}
ExpectedValue() : expected_value_(DEL_MASK) {}
explicit ExpectedValue(uint32_t expected_value)
: expected_value_(expected_value) {}

@ -571,7 +571,14 @@ class NonBatchedOpsStressTest : public StressTest {
keys.reserve(num_keys);
std::vector<PinnableSlice> values(num_keys);
std::vector<Status> statuses(num_keys);
ColumnFamilyHandle* cfh = column_families_[rand_column_families[0]];
// When Flags_use_txn is enabled, we also do a read your write check.
std::vector<std::optional<ExpectedValue>> ryw_expected_values;
ryw_expected_values.reserve(num_keys);
SharedState* shared = thread->shared;
int column_family = rand_column_families[0];
ColumnFamilyHandle* cfh = column_families_[column_family];
int error_count = 0;
// Do a consistency check between Get and MultiGet. Don't do it too
// often as it will slow db_stress down
@ -609,21 +616,32 @@ class NonBatchedOpsStressTest : public StressTest {
}
}
for (size_t i = 0; i < num_keys; ++i) {
key_str.emplace_back(Key(rand_keys[i]));
uint64_t rand_key = rand_keys[i];
key_str.emplace_back(Key(rand_key));
keys.emplace_back(key_str.back());
if (use_txn) {
if (!shared->AllowsOverwrite(rand_key) &&
shared->Exists(column_family, rand_key)) {
// Just do read your write checks for keys that allow overwrites.
ryw_expected_values.push_back(std::nullopt);
continue;
}
// With a 1 in 10 probability, insert the just added key in the batch
// into the transaction. This will create an overlap with the MultiGet
// keys and exercise some corner cases in the code
if (thread->rand.OneIn(10)) {
int op = thread->rand.Uniform(2);
Status s;
assert(txn);
switch (op) {
case 0:
case 1: {
const uint32_t value_base = 0;
ExpectedValue put_value;
put_value.Put(false /* pending */);
ryw_expected_values.emplace_back(put_value);
char value[100];
size_t sz = GenerateValue(value_base, value, sizeof(value));
size_t sz =
GenerateValue(put_value.GetValueBase(), value, sizeof(value));
Slice v(value, sz);
if (op == 0) {
s = txn->Put(cfh, keys.back(), v);
@ -632,9 +650,13 @@ class NonBatchedOpsStressTest : public StressTest {
}
break;
}
case 2:
case 2: {
ExpectedValue delete_value;
delete_value.Delete(false /* pending */);
ryw_expected_values.emplace_back(delete_value);
s = txn->Delete(cfh, keys.back());
break;
}
default:
assert(false);
}
@ -642,6 +664,8 @@ class NonBatchedOpsStressTest : public StressTest {
fprintf(stderr, "Transaction put: %s\n", s.ToString().c_str());
std::terminate();
}
} else {
ryw_expected_values.push_back(std::nullopt);
}
}
}
@ -657,6 +681,7 @@ class NonBatchedOpsStressTest : public StressTest {
error_count = fault_fs_guard->GetAndResetErrorCount();
}
} else {
assert(txn);
txn->MultiGet(readoptionscopy, cfh, num_keys, keys.data(), values.data(),
statuses.data());
}
@ -685,50 +710,119 @@ class NonBatchedOpsStressTest : public StressTest {
fault_fs_guard->DisableErrorInjection();
}
for (size_t i = 0; i < statuses.size(); ++i) {
Status s = statuses[i];
auto ryw_check =
[](const Slice& key, const PinnableSlice& value, const Status& s,
const std::optional<ExpectedValue>& ryw_expected_value) -> bool {
if (!ryw_expected_value.has_value()) {
return true;
}
const ExpectedValue& expected = ryw_expected_value.value();
char expected_value[100];
if (s.ok() &&
ExpectedValueHelper::MustHaveNotExisted(expected, expected)) {
fprintf(stderr,
"MultiGet returned value different from what was "
"written for key %s\n",
key.ToString(true).c_str());
fprintf(stderr,
"MultiGet returned ok, transaction has non-committed "
"delete.\n");
return false;
} else if (s.IsNotFound() &&
ExpectedValueHelper::MustHaveExisted(expected, expected)) {
fprintf(stderr,
"MultiGet returned value different from what was "
"written for key %s\n",
key.ToString(true).c_str());
fprintf(stderr,
"MultiGet returned not found, transaction has "
"non-committed value.\n");
return false;
} else if (s.ok() &&
ExpectedValueHelper::MustHaveExisted(expected, expected)) {
Slice from_txn_slice(value);
size_t sz = GenerateValue(expected.GetValueBase(), expected_value,
sizeof(expected_value));
Slice expected_value_slice(expected_value, sz);
if (expected_value_slice.compare(from_txn_slice) == 0) {
return true;
}
fprintf(stderr,
"MultiGet returned value different from what was "
"written for key %s\n",
key.ToString(true /* hex */).c_str());
fprintf(stderr, "MultiGet returned value %s\n",
from_txn_slice.ToString(true /* hex */).c_str());
fprintf(stderr, "Transaction has non-committed value %s\n",
expected_value_slice.ToString(true /* hex */).c_str());
return false;
}
return true;
};
auto check_multiget =
[&](const Slice& key, const PinnableSlice& expected_value,
const Status& s,
const std::optional<ExpectedValue>& ryw_expected_value) -> bool {
bool is_consistent = true;
// Only do the consistency check if no error was injected and MultiGet
// didn't return an unexpected error
bool is_ryw_correct = true;
// Only do the consistency check if no error was injected and
// MultiGet didn't return an unexpected error. If test does not use
// transaction, the consistency check for each key included check results
// from db `Get` and db `MultiGet` are consistent.
// If test use transaction, after consistency check, also do a read your
// own write check.
if (do_consistency_check && !error_count && (s.ok() || s.IsNotFound())) {
Status tmp_s;
std::string value;
if (use_txn) {
tmp_s = txn->Get(readoptionscopy, cfh, keys[i], &value);
assert(txn);
tmp_s = txn->Get(readoptionscopy, cfh, key, &value);
} else {
tmp_s = db_->Get(readoptionscopy, cfh, keys[i], &value);
tmp_s = db_->Get(readoptionscopy, cfh, key, &value);
}
if (!tmp_s.ok() && !tmp_s.IsNotFound()) {
fprintf(stderr, "Get error: %s\n", s.ToString().c_str());
is_consistent = false;
} else if (!s.ok() && tmp_s.ok()) {
fprintf(stderr, "MultiGet returned different results with key %s\n",
keys[i].ToString(true).c_str());
key.ToString(true).c_str());
fprintf(stderr, "Get returned ok, MultiGet returned not found\n");
is_consistent = false;
} else if (s.ok() && tmp_s.IsNotFound()) {
fprintf(stderr, "MultiGet returned different results with key %s\n",
keys[i].ToString(true).c_str());
key.ToString(true).c_str());
fprintf(stderr, "MultiGet returned ok, Get returned not found\n");
is_consistent = false;
} else if (s.ok() && value != values[i].ToString()) {
} else if (s.ok() && value != expected_value.ToString()) {
fprintf(stderr, "MultiGet returned different results with key %s\n",
keys[i].ToString(true).c_str());
key.ToString(true).c_str());
fprintf(stderr, "MultiGet returned value %s\n",
values[i].ToString(true).c_str());
expected_value.ToString(true).c_str());
fprintf(stderr, "Get returned value %s\n",
Slice(value).ToString(true /* hex */).c_str());
is_consistent = false;
}
}
// If test uses transaction, continue to do a read your own write check.
if (is_consistent && use_txn) {
is_ryw_correct = ryw_check(key, expected_value, s, ryw_expected_value);
}
if (!is_consistent) {
fprintf(stderr, "TestMultiGet error: is_consistent is false\n");
thread->stats.AddErrors(1);
// Fail fast to preserve the DB state
thread->shared->SetVerificationFailure();
break;
return false;
} else if (!is_ryw_correct) {
fprintf(stderr, "TestMultiGet error: is_ryw_correct is false\n");
thread->stats.AddErrors(1);
// Fail fast to preserve the DB state
thread->shared->SetVerificationFailure();
return false;
} else if (s.ok()) {
// found case
thread->stats.AddGets(1, 1);
@ -747,6 +841,18 @@ class NonBatchedOpsStressTest : public StressTest {
thread->stats.AddVerifiedErrors(1);
}
}
return true;
};
size_t num_of_keys = keys.size();
assert(values.size() == num_of_keys);
assert(statuses.size() == num_of_keys);
assert(ryw_expected_values.size() == num_of_keys);
for (size_t i = 0; i < num_of_keys; ++i) {
if (!check_multiget(keys[i], values[i], statuses[i],
ryw_expected_values[i])) {
break;
}
}
if (readoptionscopy.snapshot) {

@ -35,26 +35,32 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(
::testing::Values(std::make_tuple(false, false, WRITE_UNPREPARED),
std::make_tuple(false, true, WRITE_UNPREPARED)));
enum StressAction { NO_SNAPSHOT, RO_SNAPSHOT, REFRESH_SNAPSHOT };
class WriteUnpreparedStressTest : public WriteUnpreparedTransactionTestBase,
enum SnapshotAction { NO_SNAPSHOT, RO_SNAPSHOT, REFRESH_SNAPSHOT };
enum VerificationOperation { VERIFY_GET, VERIFY_NEXT, VERIFY_PREV };
class WriteUnpreparedSnapshotTest
: public WriteUnpreparedTransactionTestBase,
virtual public ::testing::WithParamInterface<
std::tuple<bool, StressAction>> {
std::tuple<bool, SnapshotAction, VerificationOperation>> {
public:
WriteUnpreparedStressTest()
WriteUnpreparedSnapshotTest()
: WriteUnpreparedTransactionTestBase(false, std::get<0>(GetParam()),
WRITE_UNPREPARED),
action_(std::get<1>(GetParam())) {}
StressAction action_;
action_(std::get<1>(GetParam())),
verify_op_(std::get<2>(GetParam())) {}
SnapshotAction action_;
VerificationOperation verify_op_;
};
// Test parameters:
// Param 0): use stackable db, parameterization hard coded to be overwritten to
// false. Param 1): test mode for snapshot action Param 2): test mode for
// verification operation
INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(
WriteUnpreparedStressTest, WriteUnpreparedStressTest,
::testing::Values(std::make_tuple(false, NO_SNAPSHOT),
std::make_tuple(false, RO_SNAPSHOT),
std::make_tuple(false, REFRESH_SNAPSHOT),
std::make_tuple(true, NO_SNAPSHOT),
std::make_tuple(true, RO_SNAPSHOT),
std::make_tuple(true, REFRESH_SNAPSHOT)));
WriteUnpreparedSnapshotTest, WriteUnpreparedSnapshotTest,
::testing::Combine(
::testing::Bool(),
::testing::Values(NO_SNAPSHOT, RO_SNAPSHOT, REFRESH_SNAPSHOT),
::testing::Values(VERIFY_GET, VERIFY_NEXT, VERIFY_PREV)));
TEST_P(WriteUnpreparedTransactionTest, ReadYourOwnWrite) {
// The following tests checks whether reading your own write for
@ -135,42 +141,33 @@ TEST_P(WriteUnpreparedTransactionTest, ReadYourOwnWrite) {
}
}
#if !defined(ROCKSDB_VALGRIND_RUN) || defined(ROCKSDB_FULL_VALGRIND_RUN)
TEST_P(WriteUnpreparedStressTest, ReadYourOwnWriteStress) {
// This is a stress test where different threads are writing random keys, and
// then before committing or aborting the transaction, it validates to see
// that it can read the keys it wrote, and the keys it did not write respect
// the snapshot. To avoid row lock contention (and simply stressing the
// locking system), each thread is mostly only writing to its own set of keys.
TEST_P(WriteUnpreparedSnapshotTest, ReadYourOwnWrite) {
// This test validates a transaction can read its writes and the correctness
// of its read with regard to a mocked snapshot functionality.
const uint32_t kNumIter = 1000;
const uint32_t kNumThreads = 10;
const uint32_t kNumKeys = 5;
// Test with
// 1. no snapshots set
// 2. snapshot set on ReadOptions
// 3. snapshot set, and refreshing after every write.
StressAction a = action_;
SnapshotAction snapshot_action = action_;
WriteOptions write_options;
txn_db_options.transaction_lock_timeout = -1;
options.disable_auto_compactions = true;
ASSERT_OK(ReOpen());
std::vector<std::string> keys;
for (uint32_t k = 0; k < kNumKeys * kNumThreads; k++) {
for (uint32_t k = 0; k < kNumKeys; k++) {
keys.push_back("k" + std::to_string(k));
}
RandomShuffle(keys.begin(), keys.end());
// This counter will act as a "sequence number" to help us validate
// visibility logic with snapshots. If we had direct access to the seqno of
// snapshots and key/values, then we should directly compare those instead.
std::atomic<int64_t> counter(0);
std::function<void(uint32_t)> stress_thread = [&](int id) {
size_t tid = std::hash<std::thread::id>()(std::this_thread::get_id());
Random64 rnd(static_cast<uint32_t>(tid));
std::function<void()> check_correctness_wrt_snapshot = [&]() {
Transaction* txn;
TransactionOptions txn_options;
// batch_size of 1 causes writes to DB for every marker.
@ -178,114 +175,82 @@ TEST_P(WriteUnpreparedStressTest, ReadYourOwnWriteStress) {
ReadOptions read_options;
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < kNumIter; i++) {
std::set<std::string> owned_keys(keys.begin() + id * kNumKeys,
keys.begin() + (id + 1) * kNumKeys);
// Add unowned keys to make the workload more interesting, but this
// increases row lock contention, so just do it sometimes.
if (rnd.OneIn(2)) {
owned_keys.insert(keys[rnd.Uniform(kNumKeys * kNumThreads)]);
}
txn = db->BeginTransaction(write_options, txn_options);
ASSERT_OK(txn->SetName(std::to_string(id)));
txn->SetSnapshot();
if (a >= RO_SNAPSHOT) {
if (snapshot_action >= RO_SNAPSHOT) {
read_options.snapshot = txn->GetSnapshot();
ASSERT_TRUE(read_options.snapshot != nullptr);
}
uint64_t buf[2];
buf[0] = id;
uint64_t buf[1];
// When scanning through the database, make sure that all unprepared
// keys have value >= snapshot and all other keys have value < snapshot.
// keys have value >= snapshot.
int64_t snapshot_num = counter.fetch_add(1);
Status s;
for (const auto& key : owned_keys) {
buf[1] = counter.fetch_add(1);
for (const auto& key : keys) {
buf[0] = counter.fetch_add(1);
s = txn->Put(key, Slice((const char*)buf, sizeof(buf)));
if (!s.ok()) {
break;
}
if (a == REFRESH_SNAPSHOT) {
if (snapshot_action == REFRESH_SNAPSHOT) {
txn->SetSnapshot();
read_options.snapshot = txn->GetSnapshot();
snapshot_num = counter.fetch_add(1);
}
}
// Failure is possible due to snapshot validation. In this case,
// rollback and move onto next iteration.
if (!s.ok()) {
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsBusy());
ASSERT_OK(txn->Rollback());
delete txn;
continue;
}
ASSERT_OK(s);
auto verify_key = [&owned_keys, &a, &id, &snapshot_num](
const std::string& key, const std::string& value) {
if (owned_keys.count(key) > 0) {
ASSERT_EQ(value.size(), 16);
auto verify_key = [&snapshot_action,
&snapshot_num](const std::string& value) {
ASSERT_EQ(value.size(), 8);
// Since this key is part of owned_keys, then this key must be
// unprepared by this transaction identified by 'id'
ASSERT_EQ(((int64_t*)value.c_str())[0], id);
if (a == REFRESH_SNAPSHOT) {
if (snapshot_action == REFRESH_SNAPSHOT) {
// If refresh snapshot is true, then the snapshot is refreshed
// after every Put(), meaning that the current snapshot in
// snapshot_num must be greater than the "seqno" of any keys
// written by the current transaction.
ASSERT_LT(((int64_t*)value.c_str())[1], snapshot_num);
ASSERT_LT(((int64_t*)value.c_str())[0], snapshot_num);
} else {
// If refresh snapshot is not on, then the snapshot was taken at
// the beginning of the transaction, meaning all writes must come
// after snapshot_num
ASSERT_GT(((int64_t*)value.c_str())[1], snapshot_num);
}
} else if (a >= RO_SNAPSHOT) {
// If this is not an unprepared key, just assert that the key
// "seqno" is smaller than the snapshot seqno.
ASSERT_EQ(value.size(), 16);
ASSERT_LT(((int64_t*)value.c_str())[1], snapshot_num);
ASSERT_GT(((int64_t*)value.c_str())[0], snapshot_num);
}
};
// Validate Get()/Next()/Prev(). Do only one of them to save time, and
// reduce lock contention.
switch (rnd.Uniform(3)) {
case 0: // Validate Get()
// Validate one of Get()/Next()/Prev() depending on the verification
// operation to use.
switch (verify_op_) {
case VERIFY_GET: // Validate Get()
{
for (const auto& key : keys) {
std::string value;
s = txn->Get(read_options, Slice(key), &value);
if (!s.ok()) {
ASSERT_TRUE(s.IsNotFound());
ASSERT_EQ(owned_keys.count(key), 0);
} else {
verify_key(key, value);
}
ASSERT_OK(txn->Get(read_options, Slice(key), &value));
verify_key(value);
}
break;
}
case 1: // Validate Next()
case VERIFY_NEXT: // Validate Next()
{
Iterator* iter = txn->GetIterator(read_options);
ASSERT_OK(iter->status());
for (iter->SeekToFirst(); iter->Valid(); iter->Next()) {
verify_key(iter->key().ToString(), iter->value().ToString());
verify_key(iter->value().ToString());
}
ASSERT_OK(iter->status());
delete iter;
break;
}
case 2: // Validate Prev()
case VERIFY_PREV: // Validate Prev()
{
Iterator* iter = txn->GetIterator(read_options);
ASSERT_OK(iter->status());
for (iter->SeekToLast(); iter->Valid(); iter->Prev()) {
verify_key(iter->key().ToString(), iter->value().ToString());
verify_key(iter->value().ToString());
}
ASSERT_OK(iter->status());
delete iter;
@ -295,25 +260,13 @@ TEST_P(WriteUnpreparedStressTest, ReadYourOwnWriteStress) {
FAIL();
}
if (rnd.OneIn(2)) {
ASSERT_OK(txn->Commit());
} else {
ASSERT_OK(txn->Rollback());
}
delete txn;
}
};
std::vector<port::Thread> threads;
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < kNumThreads; i++) {
threads.emplace_back(stress_thread, i);
}
for (auto& t : threads) {
t.join();
}
check_correctness_wrt_snapshot();
}
#endif // !defined(ROCKSDB_VALGRIND_RUN) || defined(ROCKSDB_FULL_VALGRIND_RUN)
// This tests how write unprepared behaves during recovery when the DB crashes
// after a transaction has either been unprepared or prepared, and tests if

Loading…
Cancel
Save