Summary:
Complements https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10867 with some manual edits to avoid weird formatting or to avoid massive reformatting third party code.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10870
Test Plan: `make check` etc
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D40686526
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 6af988fe4b0a8ae4a5992ec2c3c37fe67584226e
Summary:
Closes - https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7710
I tested this on an Apple DTK (Developer Transition Kit) with an Apple A12Z Bionic CPU and macOS Big Sur (11.0.1).
Previously the arm64 specific CRC optimisations were limited to Linux only OS... Well now Apple Silicon is also arm64 but runs macOS ;-)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7714
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D25287349
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 639b168bf0ac2652907531e9604936ac4974b577
Summary:
Issue：https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7042
No PMULL runtime check will lead to SIGILL on a Raspberry pi 4.
Leverage 'getauxval' to get Hardware-Cap to detect whether target
platform does support PMULL or not in runtime.
Consider the condition that the target platform does support crc32 but not support PMULL.
In this condition, the code should leverage the crc32 instruction
rather than skip all hardware crc32 instruction.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7233
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D23790116
fbshipit-source-id: a3ebd821fbd4a38dd2f59064adbb7c3013ee8140
Summary:
Further apply formatter to more recent commits.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5830
Test Plan: Run all existing tests.
Differential Revision: D17488031
fbshipit-source-id: 137458fd94d56dd271b8b40c522b03036943a2ab
Summary:
Some recent commits might not have passed through the formatter. I formatted recent 45 commits. The script hangs for more commits so I stopped there.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5827
Test Plan: Run all existing tests.
Differential Revision: D17483727
fbshipit-source-id: af23113ee63015d8a43d89a3bc2c1056189afe8f
Summary:
prefetch data for following block，avoid cache miss when doing crc caculate
I do performance test at kunpeng-920 server(arm-v8, 64core@2.6GHz)
./db_bench --benchmarks=crc32c --block_size=500000000
before optimise : 587313.500 micros/op 1 ops/sec; 811.9 MB/s (500000000 per op)
after optimise : 289248.500 micros/op 3 ops/sec; 1648.5 MB/s (500000000 per op)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5773
Differential Revision: D17347339
fbshipit-source-id: bfcd74f0f0eb4b322b959be68019ddcaae1e3341
Summary:
Crc32c Parallel computation optimization:
Algorithm comes from Intel whitepaper: [crc-iscsi-polynomial-crc32-instruction-paper](https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/white-papers/crc-iscsi-polynomial-crc32-instruction-paper.pdf)
Input data is divided into three equal-sized blocks
Three parallel blocks (crc0, crc1, crc2) for 1024 Bytes
One Block: 42(BLK_LENGTH) * 8(step length: crc32c_u64) bytes
1. crc32c_test:
```
[==========] Running 4 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 4 tests from CRC
[ RUN ] CRC.StandardResults
[ OK ] CRC.StandardResults (1 ms)
[ RUN ] CRC.Values
[ OK ] CRC.Values (0 ms)
[ RUN ] CRC.Extend
[ OK ] CRC.Extend (0 ms)
[ RUN ] CRC.Mask
[ OK ] CRC.Mask (0 ms)
[----------] 4 tests from CRC (1 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 4 tests from 1 test case ran. (1 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 4 tests.
```
2. RocksDB benchmark: db_bench --benchmarks="crc32c"
```
Linear Arm crc32c:
crc32c: 1.005 micros/op 995133 ops/sec; 3887.2 MB/s (4096 per op)
```
```
Parallel optimization with Armv8 crypto extension:
crc32c: 0.419 micros/op 2385078 ops/sec; 9316.7 MB/s (4096 per op)
```
It gets ~2.4x speedup compared to linear Arm crc32c instructions.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5494
Differential Revision: D16340806
fbshipit-source-id: 95dae9a5b646fd20a8303671d82f17b2e162e945
Summary:
When using `PRIu64` type of printf specifier, current code base does the following:
```
#ifndef __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS
#define __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS
#endif
#include <inttypes.h>
```
However, this can be simplified to
```
#include <cinttypes>
```
as long as flag `-std=c++11` is used.
This should solve issues like https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/5159
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5402
Differential Revision: D15701195
Pulled By: miasantreble
fbshipit-source-id: 6dac0a05f52aadb55e9728038599d3d2e4b59d03
Peter Dillinger