Summary:
This is a 500ns operation while the whole Get() call takes only a few
micro!
Test Plan: ran db_bench, for a DB with 50M keys, QPS jumps from 5.2M/s to 7.2M/s
Reviewers: haobo, igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17007
Summary: Add a property to calculate number of background errors encountered to help users build their monitoring
Test Plan: Add a unit test. make all check
Reviewers: haobo, igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: ljin, nkg-, yhchiang, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16959
Summary: To partly address the request @nkg- raised, add three easy-to-add properties to compactions and flushes.
Test Plan: run unit tests and add a new unit test to cover new properties.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: nkg-, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13677
Summary:
Finalize re-sorts (read: mutates) the files_ in Version* and it is called by CompactionPicker during normal runtime. At the same time, this same Version* lives in the SuperVersion* and is accessed without the mutex in GetImpl() code path.
Mutating the files_ in one thread and reading the same files_ in another thread is a bad idea. It caused this issue: http://ci-builds.fb.com/job/rocksdb_crashtest/285/console
Long-term, we need to be more careful with method contracts and clearly document what state can be mutated when. Now that we are much faster because we don't lock in GetImpl(), we keep running into data races that were not a problem before when we were slower. db_stress has been very helpful in detecting those.
Short-term, I removed Finalize() from CompactionPicker.
Note: I believe this is an issue in current 2.7 version running in production.
Test Plan:
make check
Will also run db_stress to see if issue is gone
Reviewers: sdong, ljin, dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16983
Summary:
There is a chance that an old MANIFEST is corrupted in 2.7 but just not noticed.
This check would fail them. Change it to log instead of returning a
Corruption status.
Test Plan: make
Reviewers: haobo, igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16923
Summary: Replace "RocskDB" by "RocksDB" in INSTALL.md
Test Plan: No code change.
Reviewers: ljin, igor
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16977
Summary:
Based on my recent findings (posted in our internal group), if we use fallocate without KEEP_SIZE flag, we get superior performance of fdatasync() in append-only workloads.
This diff provides an option for user to not use KEEP_SIZE flag, thus optimizing his sync performance by up to 2x-3x.
At one point we also just called posix_fallocate instead of fallocate, which isn't very fast: http://code.woboq.org/userspace/glibc/sysdeps/posix/posix_fallocate.c.html (tl;dr it manually writes out zero bytes to allocate storage). This diff also fixes that, by first calling fallocate and then posix_fallocate if fallocate is not supported.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, sdong, haobo, ljin
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16761
Summary:
When the manifest is getting rolled the following happens:
1) manifest_file_number_ is assigned to a new manifest number (even though the old one is still current)
2) mutex is unlocked
3) SetCurrentFile() creates temporary file manifest_file_number_.dbtmp
4) SetCurrentFile() renames manifest_file_number_.dbtmp to CURRENT
5) mutex is locked
If FindObsoleteFiles happens between (3) and (4) it will:
1) Delete manifest_file_number_.dbtmp (because it's not in pending_outputs_)
2) Delete old manifest (because the manifest_file_number_ already points to a new one)
I introduce the concept of prev_manifest_file_number_ that will avoid the race condition.
However, we should discuss the future of MANIFEST file rolling. We found some race conditions with it last week and who knows how many more are there. Nobody is using it in production because we don't trust the implementation. Should we even support it?
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: ljin, dhruba, haobo, sdong
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16929
Summary: We switched to prefix_seek method of seeking. This means that anytime we check Valid(), we also need to check starts_with(prefix)
Test Plan: ran db_stress
Reviewers: ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16953
Summary:
Added an option to BackupableDB implementation that allows users to persist in-memory databases. When the restore happens with keep_log_files = true, it will
*) Not delete existing log files in wal_dir
*) Move log files from archive directory to wal_dir, so that DB can replay them if necessary
Test Plan: Added an unit test
Reviewers: dhruba, ljin
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16941
Summary:
Memtable will now be forced to flush if the one of the following
conditions is met:
1. Already allocated more than write_buffer_size + 60% arena block size.
(the overflowing condition)
2. Unable to safely allocate one more arena block without hitting the
overflowing condition AND the unused allocated memory < 25% arena
block size.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: sdong, haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16893
Summary: We're trying to deprecate prefix iterators, so no need to test them in db_stress
Test Plan: ran it
Reviewers: ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16917
Summary: Prev() now can hang when there is a key with more than max_skipped number of appearance internally but all of them are newer than the sequence ID to seek. Add unit tests to confirm the bug and fix it.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: igor, haobo
Reviewed By: igor
CC: ljin, yhchiang, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16899
Summary:
In the last fix, I forgot to point to the writer when comparing edit,
which is apparently not correct.
Test Plan: still running make whitebox_crash_test
Reviewers: igor, haobo, igor2
Reviewed By: igor2
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16911
Summary:
Here is what it can cause probelm:
There is one memtable flush and one compaction. Both call LogAndApply(). If both edits are applied in the same batch with flush edit first and the compaction edit followed. LogAndApplyHelper() will assign compaction edit current VersionSet's log number(which should be smaller than the log number from flush edit). It cause log_numbers in MANIFEST to be not monotonic increasing, which violates the assume Recover() makes. What is more is after comitting to MANIFEST file, log_number_ in VersionSet is updated to the log_number from the last edit, which is the compaction one. It ends up not updating the log_number.
Test Plan:
make whitebox_crash_test
got another assertion about iter->valid(), not sure if that is related
to this.
Reviewers: igor, haobo
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16875
Summary: Client doesn't need to know anything about ColumnFamily ID. By making WriteBatch take ColumnFamilyHandle as a parameter, we can eliminate method GetID() from ColumnFamilyHandle
Test Plan: column_family_test
Reviewers: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16887
Summary:
Original Summary:
Yesterday, @ljin and I were debugging various db_stress issues. We suspected one of them happens when we concurrently call NewIterator without prefix_seek on HashSkipList. This test demonstrates it.
Update:
Arena is not thread-safe!! When creating a new full iterator, we *have* to create a new arena, otherwise we're doomed.
Test Plan: SIGSEGV and assertion-throwing test now works!
Reviewers: ljin, haobo, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb, ljin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16857
Summary:
With D16767, there is a case compaction tasks are scheduled infinitely:
(1) no flush thread is configured and more than 1 compaction threads
(2) a flush is going on by one compaction hread
(3) the state of SST files is in the state that versions_->current()->NeedsCompaction() will generate a false positive (return true actually there is no work to be done)
In that case, a infinite loop will be formed.
This patch would fix it.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: igor
CC: dhruba, yhchiang, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16863
Summary:
this should fix the hash_skip_list issue, but I still see seqno
assertion failure in the last run. Will continue investigating and
address that in a different diff
Test Plan: make whitebox_crash_test
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16851
Summary:
Hash skip list has issues, causing db_stress to fail badly.
For now, switching back to skip_list by default before we figure out root cause.
Test Plan: db_stress is happy(ier)
Reviewers: ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16845
Summary:
This is is based on https://reviews.facebook.net/D15027. It's not finished but I would like to give a prototype to avoid arena over-allocation while making better use of the already allocated memory blocks.
Instead of check approximate memtable size, we will take a deeper look at the arena, which incorporate essential idea that @sdong suggests: flush when arena has allocated its last and the last is "almost full"
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: haobo, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb, sdong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15051
Summary: Syncing in stress test makes it run much much much slower. It also doesn't add much value IMO.
Test Plan: no
Reviewers: ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16839
Igor Canadi