Summary: When we drop the column family, we want to delete all the files from that column family.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15561
Summary: This one is big. It adds ability to write to and read from different column families (see the unit test). It also supports recovery of different column families from log, which was the hardest part to reason about. We need to make sure to never delete the log file which has unflushed data from any column family. To support that, I added another concept, which is versions_->MinLogNumber()
Test Plan: Added a unit test in column_family_test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15537
Summary:
* Add a change log for rocksdb releases.
* Remove the hacky parts of make_new_version.sh, which are either
no longer useful or will be done in our dedicated 3rd-party release
tool.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: igor, haobo, sdong, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15543
Summary:
if it happens (randomly) to corrupt shared file in the test, then the
checksum will be inconsistent between meta files from different backup.
BackupEngine will then detect this issue and fail. But in reality, this
does not happen since the checksum is checked on every backup. So here,
only corrupt checksum of private file to let BackupEngine to construct
properly (but fail during restore).
Test Plan: run test with valgrind
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15531
Summary:
I came across this while working on column families. CorruptionTest::RecoverWriteError threw a SIGSEG because the descriptor_log_->file() was nullptr. I'm not sure why it doesn't happen in master, but better safe than sorry.
@kailiu, can we get this in release, too?
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: kailiu, dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, kailiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15513
Summary: I think it looks nicer. In RocksDB we have both styles, but I think that static method is the more common version.
Test Plan: backupable_db_test
Reviewers: ljin, benj, swk
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15519
Summary:
Lots of clients have problems with using StackableDB interface. It's nice to have BackupableDB as a layer on top of DB, but not necessary.
This diff exports BackupEngine, which can be used to create backups without forcing clients to use StackableDB interface.
Test Plan: backupable_db_test
Reviewers: dhruba, ljin, swk
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb, benj
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15477
Summary: Keep checksum of each backuped file in meta file. When it restores these files, compute their checksum on the fly and compare against what is in the meta file. Fail the restore process if checksum mismatch.
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: haobo, igor, sdong, kailiu
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15381
Summary:
Blocks in the transaction log are a fixed size, but the last block in the transaction log file is usually a partial block. When a new record is added after the reader hit the end of the file, a new physical record will be appended to the last block. ReadPhysicalRecord can only read full blocks and assumes that the file position indicator is aligned to the start of a block. If the reader is forced to read further by simply clearing the EOF flag, ReadPhysicalRecord will read a full block starting from somewhere in the middle of a real block, causing it to lose alignment and to have a partial physical record at the end of the read buffer. This will result in length mismatches and checksum failures. When the log file is tailed for replication this will cause the log iterator to become invalid, necessitating the creation of a new iterator which will have to read the log file from scratch.
This diff fixes this issue by reading the remaining portion of the last block we read from. This is done when the reader is forced to read further (UnmarkEOF is called).
Test Plan:
- Added unit tests
- Stress test (with replication). Check dbdir/LOG file for corruptions.
- Test on test tier
Reviewers: emayanke, haobo, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: vamsi, sheki, dhruba, kailiu, igor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15249
Summary: This removes the default implementation of LogAndApply that applied the changed to the default column family by default. It is mostly simple reformatting.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15465
Summary: All memtables and immutable memtables are moved from DBImpl to ColumnFamilyData. For now, they are all referenced from default column family in DBImpl. It shouldn't be hard to get them from custom column family.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, kailiu, sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15459
Summary:
@dhruba, I'm not sure where we need to sync the directory. I implemented the function in Env() and added the dir sync just after we close the newly created file in the builder.
Should I also add FsyncDir() to new files that get created by a compaction?
Test Plan: Confirmed that FsyncDir is returning Status::OK()
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14751
Summary: There is no reason to have functions NeedCompaction(), MaxCompactionScore() and MaxCompactionScoreLevel() in VersionSet, since they don't access any data in VersionSet.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: kailiu, haobo, sdong
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15333
ReduceNumberOfLevels had segmentation fault in WriteSnapshot() since we
didn't change the number of levels in VersionSet (we consider them
immutable from now on). This fixes the problem.
Summary: By removing some includes form options.h and reply on forward declaration, we can more easily reason the dependencies.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: kailiu, haobo, igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15411
Summary: On a shutdown, freeing memory takes a long time. If we're shutting down, we don't really care about memory leaks. I added a call to Cache that will avoid freeing all objects in cache.
Test Plan:
I created a script to test the speedup and demonstrate how to use the call: https://phabricator.fb.com/P3864368
Clean shutdown took 7.2 seconds, while fast and dirty one took 6.3 seconds. Unfortunately, the speedup is not that big, but should be bigger with bigger block_cache. I have set up the capacity to 80GB, but the script filled up only ~7GB.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, MarkCallaghan, xjin
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15069
Summary:
A lot of our code implicitly assumes number_levels to be static. ReduceNumberOfLevels() breaks that assumption. For example, after calling ReduceNumberOfLevels(), DBImpl::NumberLevels() will be different from VersionSet::NumberLevels(). This is dangerous. Thankfully, it's not in public headers and is only used from LDB cmd tool. LDB tool is only using it statically, i.e. it never calls it with running DB instance. With this diff, we make it explicitly static. This way, we can assume number_levels to be immutable and not break assumption that lot of our code is relying upon. LDB tool can still use the method.
Also, I removed the method from a separate file since it breaks filename completition. version_se<TAB> now completes to "version_set." instead of "version_set" (without the dot). I don't see a big reason that the function should be in a different file.
Test Plan: reduce_levels_test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15303
Summary:
MemTableListVersion is to MemTableList what Version is to VersionSet. I took almost the same ideas to develop MemTableListVersion. The reason is to have copying std::list done in background, while flushing, rather than in foreground (MultiGet() and NewIterator()) under a mutex! Also, whenever we copied MemTableList, we copied also some MemTableList metadata (flush_requested_, commit_in_progress_, etc.), which was wasteful.
This diff avoids std::list copy under a mutex in both MultiGet() and NewIterator(). I created a small database with some number of immutable memtables, and creating 100.000 iterators in a single-thread (!) decreased from {188739, 215703, 198028} to {154352, 164035, 159817}. A lot of the savings come from code under a mutex, so we should see much higher savings with multiple threads. Creating new iterator is very important to LogDevice team.
I also think this diff will make SuperVersion obsolete for performance reasons. I will try it in the next diff. SuperVersion gave us huge savings on Get() code path, but I think that most of the savings came from copying MemTableList under a mutex. If we had MemTableListVersion, we would never need to copy the entire object (like we still do in NewIterator() and MultiGet())
Test Plan: `make check` works. I will also do `make valgrind_check` before commit
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong, emayanke, tnovak
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15255
Summary:
Previous we made `make release` also compile shared library. However it takes a long time to complete.
To make our development process more efficient. I added a new make target shared_lib.
User can of course run `make <library_name>` for direct compilation. However the <library_name> changed under certain condition. Thus we need `make shared_lib` to get rid of the memorization from users' side.
Test Plan: make shared_lib
Reviewers: igor, sdong, haobo, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15309
Summary:
Mixing index/filter blocks with data blocks resulted in some known
issues. To make sure in next release our users won't be affected,
we added a new option in BlockBasedTableFactory::TableOption to
conceal this functionality for now.
This patch also introduced a BlockBasedTableReader::OpenOptions,
which avoids the "infinite" growth of parameters in
BlockBasedTableReader::Open().
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, tnovak
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15327
Summary:
It looks like we might have some trouble when building the new release with 4.8, since fbcode is using glibc2.17-fb by default and we are using glibc2.17. It was reported by Benjamin Renard in our internal group.
This diff moves our fbcode build to use glibc2.17-fb by default. I got some linker errors when compiling, complaining that `google::SetUsageMessage()` was undefined. After deleting all offending lines, the compile was successful and everything works.
Test Plan:
Compiled
Ran ./db_bench ./db_stress ./db_repl_stress
Reviewers: kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15405
Summary: Currently, compaction multipliers can overflow and cause unexpected behaviors. In this patch, we detect those overflows and use multiplier 1 for them.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, igor, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15321
Summary: as title
Test Plan:
make all check
What else tests shall I cover?
Reviewers: igor, haobo
CC:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15339
Summary:
This diff implements a special type of iterator that doesn't create a snapshot
(can be used to read newly inserted data) and is optimized for doing sequential
reads.
TailingIterator uses current superversion number to determine whether to
invalidate its internal iterators. If the version hasn't changed, it can often
avoid doing expensive seeks over immutable structures (sst files and immutable
memtables).
Test Plan:
* new unit tests
* running LD with this patch
Reviewers: igor, dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb, lovro, march
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15285
Summary:
For some reason, D15099 caused a big performance regression: https://fburl.com/16059000
After digging a bit, I figured out that the reason was that std::atomic_uint_fast64_t was allocated in an array. When I switched from an array to vector, the QPS returned to the previous level. I'm not sure why this is happening, but this diff seems to fix the performance regression.
Test Plan: I ran the regression script, observed the performance going back to normal
Reviewers: tnovak, kailiu, haobo
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15375
Summary:
After we reached a consensus on code format, which follows exactly
Google's coding style, a natural follow-up is to have a style checker
that can handle stuffs beyond format.
Google already has a powerful style checker "cpplint.py" and,
luckily, phabricator already provides the built-in linter for it!
Next time with "arc lint" most style inconsistency will be detected
(but will not be fixed).
Also I copied cpplint.py to linters directory, which is mostly
because we may need the flexibility to make some modifications on
it for our own need.
Test Plan:
ran arc lint table/block_based_table_builder.cc to see the amazing
results.
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15369
Summary:
I created a separate class ColumnFamilySet to keep track of column families. Before we did this in VersionSet and I believe this approach is cleaner.
Let me know if you have any comments. I will commit tomorrow.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15357
Summary:
In this diff I made some effort to reduce usage of friending. To do that, I had to expose Compaction::inputs_ through a method inputs(). Not sure if this is a good idea, there is a trade-off. I think it's less confusing than having lots of friends.
I also thought about other friendship relationships, but they are too much tangled at this point. Once you friend two classes, it's very hard to unfriend them :)
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, sdong, dhruba
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15267
Igor Canadi