Summary: Adds three new WriteBatch data types: Prepare(xid), Commit(xid), Rollback(xid). Prepare(xid) should precede the (single) operation to which is applies. There can obviously be multiple Prepare(xid) markers. There should only be one Rollback(xid) or Commit(xid) marker yet not both. None of this logic is currently enforced and will most likely be implemented further up such as in the memtableinserter. All three markers are similar to PutLogData in that they are writebatch meta-data, ie stored but not counted. All three markers differ from PutLogData in that they will actually be written to disk. As for WriteBatchWithIndex, Prepare, Commit, Rollback are all implemented just as PutLogData and none are tested just as PutLogData.
Test Plan: single unit test in write_batch_test.
Reviewers: hermanlee4, sdong, anthony
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba, vasilep, andrewkr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57867
Summary: Adds three new WriteBatch data types: Prepare(xid), Commit(xid), Rollback(xid). Prepare(xid) should precede the (single) operation to which is applies. There can obviously be multiple Prepare(xid) markers. There should only be one Rollback(xid) or Commit(xid) marker yet not both. None of this logic is currently enforced and will most likely be implemented further up such as in the memtableinserter. All three markers are similar to PutLogData in that they are writebatch meta-data, ie stored but not counted. All three markers differ from PutLogData in that they will actually be written to disk. As for WriteBatchWithIndex, Prepare, Commit, Rollback are all implemented just as PutLogData and none are tested just as PutLogData.
Test Plan: single unit test in write_batch_test.
Reviewers: hermanlee4, sdong, anthony
Subscribers: andrewkr, vasilep, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D54093
Summary:
Parallel writes will only be possible for certain combinations of
flags and WriteBatch contents. Traversing the WriteBatch at write time
to check these conditions would be expensive, but it is very cheap to
keep track of when building WriteBatch-es. When loading WriteBatch-es
during recovery, a deferred computation state is used so that the flags
never need to be computed.
Test Plan:
1. add asserts and EXPECT_EQ-s
2. make check
Reviewers: sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50337
Summary: Docuemented what is currently supported by SingleDelete based on its current implementation.
Test Plan: n/a
Reviewers: sdong, kradhakrishnan, yhchiang, rven
Reviewed By: rven
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50205
Summary:
This patch fixes#7460559. It introduces SingleDelete as a new database
operation. This operation can be used to delete keys that were never
overwritten (no put following another put of the same key). If an overwritten
key is single deleted the behavior is undefined. Single deletion of a
non-existent key has no effect but multiple consecutive single deletions are
not allowed (see limitations).
In contrast to the conventional Delete() operation, the deletion entry is
removed along with the value when the two are lined up in a compaction. Note:
The semantics are similar to @igor's prototype that allowed to have this
behavior on the granularity of a column family (
https://reviews.facebook.net/D42093 ). This new patch, however, is more
aggressive when it comes to removing tombstones: It removes the SingleDelete
together with the value whenever there is no snapshot between them while the
older patch only did this when the sequence number of the deletion was older
than the earliest snapshot.
Most of the complex additions are in the Compaction Iterator, all other changes
should be relatively straightforward. The patch also includes basic support for
single deletions in db_stress and db_bench.
Limitations:
- Not compatible with cuckoo hash tables
- Single deletions cannot be used in combination with merges and normal
deletions on the same key (other keys are not affected by this)
- Consecutive single deletions are currently not allowed (and older version of
this patch supported this so it could be resurrected if needed)
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, rven, anthony, yoshinorim, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: maykov, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43179
Summary:
Support RollbackToSavePoint() in WriteBatch and WriteBatchWithIndex. Support for partial transaction rollback is needed for MyRocks.
An alternate implementation of Transaction::RollbackToSavePoint() exists in D40869. However, the other implementation is messier because it is implemented outside of WriteBatch. This implementation is much cleaner and also exposes a potentially useful feature to WriteBatch.
Test Plan: Added unit tests
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, kradhakrishnan, maykov, yoshinorim, hermanlee4, spetrunia, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42723
Summary: Make RocksDb build and run on Windows to be functionally
complete and performant. All existing test cases run with no
regressions. Performance numbers are in the pull-request.
Test plan: make all of the existing unit tests pass, obtain perf numbers.
Co-authored-by: Praveen Rao praveensinghrao@outlook.com
Co-authored-by: Sherlock Huang baihan.huang@gmail.com
Co-authored-by: Alex Zinoviev alexander.zinoviev@me.com
Co-authored-by: Dmitri Smirnov dmitrism@microsoft.com
Summary: WriteBatch and WriteBatchWithIndex now both inherit from a common abstract base class. This makes it easier to write code that is agnostic toward the implementation of the particular write batch. In particular, I plan on utilizing this abstraction to allow transactions to support using either implementation of a write batch.
Test Plan: modified existing WriteBatchWithIndex tests to test new functions. Running all tests.
Reviewers: igor, rven, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34017
Summary:
Remove the use of exception in WriteBatch::Handler. Now the default
implementations of Put, Merge, and Delete in WriteBatch::Handler are no-op.
Test Plan:
Add three test cases in write_batch_test
./write_batch_test
Reviewers: sdong, igor
Reviewed By: sdong, igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D29835
Summary:
Add WriteBatchWithIndex so that a user can query data out of a WriteBatch, to support MongoDB's read-its-own-write.
WriteBatchWithIndex uses a skiplist to store the binary index. The index stores the offset of the entry in the write batch. When searching for a key, the key for the entry is read by read the entry from the write batch from the offset.
Define a new iterator class for querying data out of WriteBatchWithIndex. A user can create an iterator of the write batch for one column family, seek to a key and keep calling Next() to see next entries.
I will add more unit tests if people are OK about this API.
Test Plan:
make all check
Add unit tests.
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, MarkCallaghan, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21381
Summary:
This is a rough sketch of our new document API. Would like to get some thoughts and comments about the high-level architecture and API.
I didn't optimize for performance at all. Leaving some low-hanging fruit so that we can be happy when we fix them! :)
Currently, bunch of features are not supported at all. Indexes can be only specified when creating database. There is no query planner whatsoever. This will all be added in due time.
Test Plan: Added a simple unit test
Reviewers: haobo, yhchiang, dhruba, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18747
Summary:
This will enable people using TTL DB to do so with multiple column families. They can also specify different TTLs for each one.
TODO: Implement CreateColumnFamily() in TTL world.
Test Plan: Added a very simple sanity test.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, alberts
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17859
Summary: Client doesn't need to know anything about ColumnFamily ID. By making WriteBatch take ColumnFamilyHandle as a parameter, we can eliminate method GetID() from ColumnFamilyHandle
Test Plan: column_family_test
Reviewers: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16887
Summary:
* Add ColumnFamilyHandle::GetID() function. Client needs to know column family's ID to be able to construct WriteBatch
* Handle WriteBatch::Handler failure gracefully. Since WriteBatch is not a very smart function (it takes raw CF id), client can add data to WriteBatch for column family that doesn't exist. In that case, we need to gracefully return failure status from DB::Write(). To do that, I added a return Status to WriteBatch functions PutCF, DeleteCF and MergeCF.
Test Plan: Added test to column_family_test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16323
Summary:
The change to the public behavior:
* When opening a DB or creating new column family client gets a ColumnFamilyHandle.
* As long as column family handle is alive, client can do whatever he wants with it, even drop it
* Dropped column family can still be read from (using the column family handle)
* Added a new call CloseColumnFamily(). Client has to close all column families that he has opened before deleting the DB
* As soon as column family is closed, any calls to DB using that column family handle will fail (also any outstanding calls)
Internally:
* Ref-counting ColumnFamilyData
* New thread-safety for ColumnFamilySet
* Dropped column families are now completely dropped and their memory cleaned-up
Test Plan: added some tests to column_family_test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16101
Summary:
In one of CPU profiles, we see some CPU costs of string::reserve() inside Batch.Put(). This patch should be able to reduce some of the costs by allocating sufficient buffer before hand.
Since it is a trivial percentage of CPU costs, I didn't find a way to show the improvement in one of the benchmarks. I'll deploy it to same application and do the same CPU profiling to make sure those CPU costs are reduced.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, nkg-
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15135
Summary:
In one of CPU profiles, we see some CPU costs of string::reserve() inside Batch.Put(). This patch should be able to reduce some of the costs by allocating sufficient buffer before hand.
Since it is a trivial percentage of CPU costs, I didn't find a way to show the improvement in one of the benchmarks. I'll deploy it to same application and do the same CPU profiling to make sure those CPU costs are reduced.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, nkg-
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15135
Summary:
WriteBatch::Data() now is easily to be misuse by users. Also, there is no cheap way for user of WriteBatch to know the data size accumulated. This patch fix the problem by:
(1) return a constant reference to Data() so it's obvious to caller what it means.
(2) add a function to return data size directly
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, igor, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: zshao, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15123
Summary:
I have added three new value types:
* kTypeColumnFamilyDeletion
* kTypeColumnFamilyValue
* kTypeColumnFamilyMerge
which include column family Varint32 before the data (value, deletion and merge). These values are used only in WAL (not in memtables yet).
This endeavour required changing some WriteBatch internals.
Test Plan: Added a unittest
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15045
Summary:
<This diff is for Column Family branch>
Sharing some of the work I've done so far. This diff compiles and passes the tests.
The biggest change is in options.h - I broke down Options into two parts - DBOptions and ColumnFamilyOptions. DBOptions is DB-specific (env, create_if_missing, block_cache, etc.) and ColumnFamilyOptions is column family-specific (all compaction options, compresion options, etc.). Note that this does not break backwards compatibility at all.
Further, I created DBWithColumnFamily which inherits DB interface and adds new functions with column family support. Clients can transparently switch to DBWithColumnFamily and it will not break their backwards compatibility.
There are few methods worth checking out: ListColumnFamilies(), MultiNewIterator(), MultiGet() and GetSnapshot(). [GetSnapshot() returns the snapshot across all column families for now - I think that's what we agreed on]
Finally, I made small changes to WriteBatch so we are able to atomically insert data across column families.
Please provide feedback.
Test Plan: make check works, the code is backward compatible
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu, emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14445
Summary: The work to make sure mac os compiles rocksdb is not completed yet. But at least we can start cleaning some warnings captured only by g++ from mac os..
Test Plan: ran make in mac os
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14049
Summary: In our project, when writing to the database, we want to form the value as the concatenation of a small header and a larger payload. It's a shame to have to copy the payload just so we can give RocksDB API a linear view of the value. Since RocksDB makes a copy internally, it's easy to support gather writes.
Test Plan: write_batch_test, new test case
Reviewers: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13947
Summary:
The previous release 2.4 had a mapping to alias the older
namespace to rocksdb. This mapping is not needed in the new
release.
Test Plan:
make check
make release
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13359
Summary:
Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb. This allows a single
application to link in open-source leveldb code as well as
rocksdb code into the same process.
Test Plan: compile rocksdb
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13287
Summary: LogData doesn't consume sequence numbers and doesn't increase the count of the write-batch. Also it was discussed that GetLiveFiles will have to be followed by GetSortedWalFiles to get a lossless backup
Test Plan: visual
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12753
Summary: Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.
Test Plan:
make clean; make check
make clean; make release
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12489
Summary:
Sometimes you don't need to iterate through the whole WriteBatch. This diff makes the Handler member functions return a bool that indicates whether to abort or not. If they return true, the iteration stops.
One thing I just thought of is that this will break backwards-compability. Maybe it would be better to add a virtual member function WriteBatch::Handler::ShouldAbort() that returns false by default. Comments requested.
I still have to add a new unit test for the abort code, but let's finalize the API first.
Test Plan: make -j32 check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, vamsi, emayanke
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12339
Summary:
This patch adds the ability for the user to add sequences of arbitrary data (blobs) to write batches. These blobs are saved to the log along with everything else in the write batch. You can add multiple blobs per WriteBatch and the ordering of blobs, puts, merges, and deletes are preserved.
Blobs are not saves to SST files. RocksDB ignores blobs in every way except for writing them to the log.
Before committing this patch, I need to add some test code. But I'm submitting it now so people can comment on the API.
Test Plan: make -j32 check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, vamsi
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12195
Summary: As title. Exposed a Count function that returns the number of updates in a batch. Could be handy for replication sequence number check.
Test Plan: make check;
Reviewers: emayanke, sheki, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11523
Summary:
This diff introduces a new Merge operation into rocksdb.
The purpose of this review is mostly getting feedback from the team (everyone please) on the design.
Please focus on the four files under include/leveldb/, as they spell the client visible interface change.
include/leveldb/db.h
include/leveldb/merge_operator.h
include/leveldb/options.h
include/leveldb/write_batch.h
Please go over local/my_test.cc carefully, as it is a concerete use case.
Please also review the impelmentation files to see if the straw man implementation makes sense.
Note that, the diff does pass all make check and truly supports forward iterator over db and a version
of Get that's based on iterator.
Future work:
- Integration with compaction
- A raw Get implementation
I am working on a wiki that explains the design and implementation choices, but coding comes
just naturally and I think it might be a good idea to share the code earlier. The code is
heavily commented.
Test Plan: run all local tests
Reviewers: dhruba, heyongqiang
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, zshao, sheki, emayanke, MarkCallaghan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9651
Summary:
1. The OpenForReadOnly() call should not lock the db. This is useful
so that multiple processes can open the same database concurrently
for reading.
2. GetUpdatesSince should not error out if the archive directory
does not exist.
3. A new constructor for WriteBatch that can takes a serialized
string as a parameter of the constructor.
Test Plan: make clean check
Reviewers: sheki
Reviewed By: sheki
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D7449
Summary:
Expose the serialized string that represents a WriteBatch. This
is helpful to replicate a writebatch operation from one machine
to another.
Test Plan: make clean check
Reviewers: sheki
Reviewed By: sheki
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D7317
- Replace raw slice comparison with a call to user comparator.
Added test for custom comparators.
- Fix end of namespace comments.
- Fixed bug in picking inputs for a level-0 compaction.
When finding overlapping files, the covered range may expand
as files are added to the input set. We now correctly expand
the range when this happens instead of continuing to use the
old range. For example, suppose L0 contains files with the
following ranges:
F1: a .. d
F2: c .. g
F3: f .. j
and the initial compaction target is F3. We used to search
for range f..j which yielded {F2,F3}. However we now expand
the range as soon as another file is added. In this case,
when F2 is added, we expand the range to c..j and restart the
search. That picks up file F1 as well.
This change fixes a bug related to deleted keys showing up
incorrectly after a compaction as described in Issue 44.
(Sync with upstream @25072954)
Adam Retter