Summary: Make RocksDb build and run on Windows to be functionally
complete and performant. All existing test cases run with no
regressions. Performance numbers are in the pull-request.
Test plan: make all of the existing unit tests pass, obtain perf numbers.
Co-authored-by: Praveen Rao praveensinghrao@outlook.com
Co-authored-by: Sherlock Huang baihan.huang@gmail.com
Co-authored-by: Alex Zinoviev alexander.zinoviev@me.com
Co-authored-by: Dmitri Smirnov dmitrism@microsoft.com
Summary:
Currently users have no idea a key is add, delete or merge from TablePropertiesCollector call back. Add a new function to add it.
Also refactor the codes so that
(1) make table property collector and internal table property collector two separate data structures with the later one now exposed
(2) table builders only receive internal table properties
Test Plan: Add cases in table_properties_collector_test to cover both of old and new ways of using TablePropertiesCollector.
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor.sugak, rven, igor
Reviewed By: rven, igor
Subscribers: meyering, yoshinorim, maykov, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D35373
Summary:
Summary:
Added a new option to ColumnFamllyOptions - optimize_filters_for_hits. This option can be used in the case where most
accesses to the store are key hits and we dont need to optimize performance for key misses.
This is useful when you have a very large database and most of your lookups succeed. The option allows the store to
not store and use filters in the last level (the largest level which contains data). These filters can take a large amount of
space for large databases (in memory and on-disk). For the last level, these filters are only useful for key misses and not
for key hits. If we are not optimizing for key misses, we can choose to not store these filters for that level.
This option is only provided for BlockBasedTable. We skip the filters when we are compacting
Test Plan:
1. Modified db_test toalso run tests with an additonal option (skip_filters_on_last_level)
2. Added another unit test to db_test which specifically tests that filters are being skipped
Reviewers: rven, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: lgalanis, yoshinorim, MarkCallaghan, rven, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D33717
Summary:
We need to turn on -Wshorten-64-to-32 for mobile. See D1671432 (internal phabricator) for details.
This diff turns on the warning flag and fixes all the errors. There were also some interesting errors that I might call bugs, especially in plain table. Going forward, I think it makes sense to have this flag turned on and be very very careful when converting 64-bit to 32-bit variables.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: ljin, rven, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: bobbaldwin, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28689
Summary:
Using module to calculate hash makes lookup ~8% slower. But it has its
benefit: file size is more predictable, more space enffient
Test Plan: db_bench
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23691
Summary:
MurmurHash becomes expensive when we do millions Get() a second in one
thread. Add this option to allow the first hash function to use identity
function as hash function. It results in QPS increase from 3.7M/s to
~4.3M/s. I did not observe improvement for end to end RocksDB
performance. This may be caused by other bottlenecks that I will address
in a separate diff.
Test Plan:
```
[ljin@dev1964 rocksdb] ./cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf --file_dir=/dev/shm --write --identity_as_first_hash=0
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExists
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExistsWithUint64Comparator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIterator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIteratorUint64
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyNotFound
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.TestReadPerformance
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.272us (3.7 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.138us (7.2 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.142us (7.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.142us (7.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.144us (6.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 125829120
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.201us (5.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.121us (8.3 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.123us (8.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.121us (8.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.112us (8.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 104857600
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.251us (4.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.107us (9.4 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.099us (10.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.100us (10.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.116us (8.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 83886080
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.189us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.095us (10.5 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.096us (10.4 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.098us (10.2 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.105us (9.5 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 73400320
[ljin@dev1964 rocksdb] ./cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf --file_dir=/dev/shm --write --identity_as_first_hash=1
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExists
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExistsWithUint64Comparator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIterator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIteratorUint64
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyNotFound
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.TestReadPerformance
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.230us (4.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.088us (11.3 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 125829120
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.159us (6.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.6 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.5 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.082us (12.2 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 104857600
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.154us (6.5 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (12.9 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.079us (12.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 83886080
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.218us (4.6 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.085us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.6 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 73400320
```
Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23451
Summary:
As a preparation to support updating some options dynamically, I'd like
to first introduce ImmutableOptions, which is a subset of Options that
cannot be changed during the course of a DB lifetime without restart.
ColumnFamily will keep both Options and ImmutableOptions. Any component
below ColumnFamily should only take ImmutableOptions in their
constructor. Other options should be taken from APIs, which will be
allowed to adjust dynamically.
I am yet to make changes to memtable and other related classes to take
ImmutableOptions in their ctor. That can be done in a seprate diff as
this one is already pretty big.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22545
Summary: It only covers Open() with default column family right now
Test Plan: make release
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22467
Summary:
Use inlined hash functions instead of function pointer. Make number of buckets a power of two and use bitwise and instead of mod.
After these changes, we get almost 50% improvement in performance.
Results:
With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.231us (4.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.229us (4.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.185us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.108us (9.3 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.100us (10.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.103us (9.7 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.101us (9.9 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.098us (10.2 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.097us (10.3 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.100us (10.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.097us (10.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.097us (10.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.102us (9.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.098us (10.2 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.115us (8.7 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.201us (5.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.155us (6.5 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.152us (6.6 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.089us (11.3 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.084us (11.9 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.6 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.087us (11.5 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.085us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.093us (10.8 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.094us (10.6 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.094us (10.7 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.093us (10.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.092us (10.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.089us (11.2 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.088us (11.3 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.154us (6.5 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.168us (6.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.190us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.081us (12.4 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.076us (13.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.072us (13.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.072us (13.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.074us (13.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.190us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.186us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.184us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.079us (12.7 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.070us (14.2 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.072us (14.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.5 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.072us (14.0 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.071us (14.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.082us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.071us (14.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.6 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.5 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Test Plan:
make check all
make valgrind_check
make asan_check
Reviewers: sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22539
Summary: This implements a cache friendly version of Cuckoo Hash in which, in case of collission, we try to insert in next few locations. The size of the neighborhood to check is taken as an input parameter in builder and stored in the table.
Test Plan:
make check all
cuckoo_table_{db,reader,builder}_test
Reviewers: sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22455
Summary:
- New Uint64 comparator
- Modify Reader and Builder to take custom user comparators instead of bytewise comparator
- Modify logic for choosing unused user key in builder
- Modify iterator logic in reader
- test changes
Test Plan:
cuckoo_table_{builder,reader,db}_test
make check all
Reviewers: ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22377
Summary: Add a virtual function in table factory that will print table options
Test Plan: make release
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22149
Summary:
Currently, PlainTable must use mmap_reads. When PlainTable is used but
allow_mmap_reads is not set, rocksdb will fail in flush.
This diff improve Options sanitization and add MmapReadRequired() to
TableFactory.
Test Plan:
export ROCKSDB_TESTS=PlainTableOptionsSanitizeTest
make db_test -j32
./db_test
Reviewers: sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: you, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21939
Summary:
Contains the following changes:
- Implementation of cuckoo_table_factory
- Adding cuckoo table into AdaptiveTableFactory
- Adding cuckoo_table_db_test, similar to lines of plain_table_db_test
- Minor fixes to Reader: When a key is found in the table, return the key found instead of the search key.
- Minor fixes to Builder: Add table properties that are required by Version::UpdateTemporaryStats() during Get operation. Don't define curr_node as a reference variable as the memory locations may get reassigned during tree.push_back operation, leading to invalid memory access.
Test Plan:
cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf
cuckoo_table_builder_test
cuckoo_table_db_test
make check all
make valgrind_check
make asan_check
Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21219
Summary:
Contains the following changes in CuckooTableBuilder:
- Take an extra parameter in constructor to identify last level file.
- Implement a better way to identify if a bucket has been inserted into the tree already during BFS search.
- Minor typos
Test Plan:
make cuckoo_table_builder
./cuckoo_table_builder
make valgrind_check
Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20445
Dmitri Smirnov