Summary:
...and fix all the errors :)
Jim suggested turning on -Wshadow because it helped him fix number of critical bugs in fbcode. I think it's a good idea to be -Wshadow clean.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27711
Summary:
Intead of passing callback function pointer and its arg on Table::Get()
interface, passing GetContext. This makes the interface cleaner and
possible better perf. Also adding a fast pass for SaveValue()
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24057
Summary:
Using module to calculate hash makes lookup ~8% slower. But it has its
benefit: file size is more predictable, more space enffient
Test Plan: db_bench
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23691
Summary:
MurmurHash becomes expensive when we do millions Get() a second in one
thread. Add this option to allow the first hash function to use identity
function as hash function. It results in QPS increase from 3.7M/s to
~4.3M/s. I did not observe improvement for end to end RocksDB
performance. This may be caused by other bottlenecks that I will address
in a separate diff.
Test Plan:
```
[ljin@dev1964 rocksdb] ./cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf --file_dir=/dev/shm --write --identity_as_first_hash=0
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExists
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExistsWithUint64Comparator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIterator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIteratorUint64
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyNotFound
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.TestReadPerformance
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.272us (3.7 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.138us (7.2 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.142us (7.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.142us (7.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.144us (6.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 125829120
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.201us (5.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.121us (8.3 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.123us (8.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.121us (8.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.112us (8.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 104857600
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.251us (4.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.107us (9.4 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.099us (10.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.100us (10.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.116us (8.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 83886080
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.189us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.095us (10.5 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.096us (10.4 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.098us (10.2 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.105us (9.5 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 73400320
[ljin@dev1964 rocksdb] ./cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf --file_dir=/dev/shm --write --identity_as_first_hash=1
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExists
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExistsWithUint64Comparator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIterator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIteratorUint64
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyNotFound
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.TestReadPerformance
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.230us (4.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.088us (11.3 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 125829120
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.159us (6.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.6 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.5 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.082us (12.2 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 104857600
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.154us (6.5 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (12.9 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.079us (12.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 83886080
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.218us (4.6 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.085us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.6 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 73400320
```
Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23451
Summary:
As a preparation to support updating some options dynamically, I'd like
to first introduce ImmutableOptions, which is a subset of Options that
cannot be changed during the course of a DB lifetime without restart.
ColumnFamily will keep both Options and ImmutableOptions. Any component
below ColumnFamily should only take ImmutableOptions in their
constructor. Other options should be taken from APIs, which will be
allowed to adjust dynamically.
I am yet to make changes to memtable and other related classes to take
ImmutableOptions in their ctor. That can be done in a seprate diff as
this one is already pretty big.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22545
Summary:
Use inlined hash functions instead of function pointer. Make number of buckets a power of two and use bitwise and instead of mod.
After these changes, we get almost 50% improvement in performance.
Results:
With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.231us (4.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.229us (4.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.185us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.108us (9.3 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.100us (10.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.103us (9.7 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.101us (9.9 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.098us (10.2 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.097us (10.3 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.100us (10.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.097us (10.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.097us (10.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.102us (9.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.098us (10.2 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.115us (8.7 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.201us (5.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.155us (6.5 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.152us (6.6 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.089us (11.3 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.084us (11.9 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.6 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.087us (11.5 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.085us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.093us (10.8 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.094us (10.6 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.094us (10.7 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.093us (10.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.092us (10.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.089us (11.2 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.088us (11.3 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.154us (6.5 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.168us (6.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.190us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.081us (12.4 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.076us (13.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.072us (13.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.072us (13.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.074us (13.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.190us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.186us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.184us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.079us (12.7 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.070us (14.2 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.072us (14.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.5 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.072us (14.0 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.071us (14.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.082us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.071us (14.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.6 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.5 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Test Plan:
make check all
make valgrind_check
make asan_check
Reviewers: sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22539
Summary: This implements a cache friendly version of Cuckoo Hash in which, in case of collission, we try to insert in next few locations. The size of the neighborhood to check is taken as an input parameter in builder and stored in the table.
Test Plan:
make check all
cuckoo_table_{db,reader,builder}_test
Reviewers: sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22455
Summary:
- New Uint64 comparator
- Modify Reader and Builder to take custom user comparators instead of bytewise comparator
- Modify logic for choosing unused user key in builder
- Modify iterator logic in reader
- test changes
Test Plan:
cuckoo_table_{builder,reader,db}_test
make check all
Reviewers: ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22377
Summary:
- Implement Prepare method
- Rewrite performance tests in cuckoo_table_reader_test to write new file only if one doesn't already exist.
- Add performance tests for batch lookup along with prefetching.
Test Plan:
./cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf
Results (We get better results if we used int64 comparator instead of string comparator (TBD in future diffs)):
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.500000, number of hash functions used: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.208us (4.8 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.500000, number of hash functions used: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.182us (5.5 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.500000, number of hash functions used: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.161us (6.2 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.500000, number of hash functions used: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.161us (6.2 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.500000, number of hash functions used: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.163us (6.1 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.600000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.252us (4.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.600000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.192us (5.2 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.600000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.195us (5.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.600000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.191us (5.2 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.600000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.194us (5.1 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.750000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.228us (4.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.750000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.185us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.750000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.186us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.750000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.189us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.750000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.188us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.900000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.325us (3.1 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.900000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.196us (5.1 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.900000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.199us (5.0 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.900000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.196us (5.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.900000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.209us (4.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22167
Summary:
Contains the following changes:
- Implementation of cuckoo_table_factory
- Adding cuckoo table into AdaptiveTableFactory
- Adding cuckoo_table_db_test, similar to lines of plain_table_db_test
- Minor fixes to Reader: When a key is found in the table, return the key found instead of the search key.
- Minor fixes to Builder: Add table properties that are required by Version::UpdateTemporaryStats() during Get operation. Don't define curr_node as a reference variable as the memory locations may get reassigned during tree.push_back operation, leading to invalid memory access.
Test Plan:
cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf
cuckoo_table_builder_test
cuckoo_table_db_test
make check all
make valgrind_check
make asan_check
Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21219
Summary:
- Maintain a list of key-value pairs as vectors during Add operation.
- Start building hash table only when Finish() is called.
- This approach takes more time and space but avoids taking file_size, key and value lengths.
- Rewrote cuckoo_table_builder_test
I did not know about IterKey while writing this diff. I shall change places where IterKey could be used instead of std::string tomorrow. Please review rest of the logic.
Test Plan:
cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf
cuckoo_table_builder_test
valgrind_check
asan_check
Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20907
Summary:
- Reads key-value pairs from file and builds an in-memory index of key-to-bucket id map in sorted order of key.
- Assumes bytewise comparator for sorting keys.
- Test changes
Test Plan:
cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf
valgrind_check
asan_check
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb, igor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20721
Summary: Made some small changes to fix the broken mac build
Test Plan: make check all in both linux and mac. All tests pass.
Reviewers: sdong, igor, ljin, yhchiang
Reviewed By: ljin, yhchiang
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20895
Summary:
- Copy the key and value to in-memory hash table during Add operation. Also modified cuckoo_table_reader_test to use this.
- Store only the user_key in in-memory hash table if it is last level file.
- Handle Carryover while chosing unused key in Finish() method in case unused key was never found before Finish() call.
Test Plan:
cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf
cuckoo_table_builder_test
valgrind_check
asan_check
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20715
Summary:
Contains:
- Implementation of TableReader based on Cuckoo Hashing
- Unittests for CuckooTableReader
- Performance test for TableReader
Test Plan:
make cuckoo_table_reader_test
./cuckoo_table_reader_test
make valgrind_check
make asan_check
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20511
Igor Canadi