Summary:
GCC < 5 + ASAN does not instrument aligned_alloc, which can make ASAN
report false-positive with "free on address which was not malloc" error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61693
Also suppress leak warning with LRUCache::DisownData().
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2783
Differential Revision: D5696465
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 87c607c002511fa089b18cc35e24909bee0e74b4
Summary:
Changes:
* checks if ASAN mode is on, and uses malloc and free in the constructor and destructor
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2767
Differential Revision: D5671243
Pulled By: armishra
fbshipit-source-id: 8e4ad0f7f163400c4effa8617d3b30134119d802
Summary:
This patch enables using PinnableSlice for RowCache, changes include
not releasing the cache handle immediately after lookup in TableCache::Get, instead pass a Cleanble function which does Cache::RleaseHandle.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2492
Differential Revision: D5316216
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: d2a684bd7e4ba73772f762e58a82b5f4fbd5d362
Summary:
This is useful when we put the entries in the block cache for accounting
purposes and do not expect it to be used after it is released. If the cache does not
erase the item in such cases not only the performance of cache is
negatively affected but the item's destructor not being called at the
time of release might violate the assumptions about the lifetime of the
object.
The new change adds a force_erase option to the Release method and
returns a boolean to indicate whehter the item is successfully deleted.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2180
Differential Revision: D4916032
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 94409a346069923cac9de8e57adc313b4ed46f28
Summary:
Move some files under util/ to new directories env/, monitoring/ options/ and cache/
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2090
Differential Revision: D4833681
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: 2fd8bef
Summary:
If the users use the NewLRUCache() without passing in the number of shard bits, instead of using hard-coded 6, we'll determine it based on capacity.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1584
Differential Revision: D4242517
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: 86b0f18
Summary:
For case !handle->InCache() && handle->refs >= 1 (the third case mentioned in lru_cache.h), the key was overwritten by Insert(). In this case, the refcount can still be incremented, and the cache handle will never enter LRU list. Fix Ref() logic for this case.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1808
Differential Revision: D4467656
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: c0784d8
Summary:
Previously the only way to increment a handle's refcount was to invoke Lookup(), which (1) did hash table lookup to get cache handle, (2) incremented that handle's refcount. For a future DeleteRange optimization, I added a function, Ref(), for when the caller already has a cache handle and only needs to do (2).
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1761
Differential Revision: D4397114
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 9addbe5
Summary:
Improve cache options logging to info log.
Also print the value of
cache_index_and_filter_blocks_with_high_priority.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1709
Differential Revision: D4358776
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 8f030a0
Summary:
We used to allow insert into full block cache as long as `strict_capacity_limit=false`. This diff further restrict insert to full cache if caller don't intent to hold handle to the cache entry after insert.
Hope this diff fix the assertion failure with db_stress: https://our.intern.facebook.com/intern/sandcastle/log/?instance_id=211853102&step_id=2475070014
db_stress: util/lru_cache.cc:278: virtual void rocksdb::LRUCacheShard::Release(rocksdb::Cache::Handle*): Assertion `lru_.next == &lru_' failed.
The assertion at lru_cache.cc:278 can fail when an entry is inserted into full cache and stay in LRU list.
Test Plan:
make all check
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, lightmark, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D62325
Summary:
Add option to block based table to insert index/filter blocks to block cache with priority. Combined with LRUCache with high_pri_pool_ratio, we can reserved space for index/filter blocks, make them less likely to be evicted.
Depends on D61977.
Test Plan: See unit test.
Reviewers: lightmark, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, march, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D62241
Summary:
Add mid-point insertion functionality to LRU cache. Caller of `Cache::Insert()` can set an additional parameter to make a cache entry have higher priority. The LRU cache will reserve at most `capacity * high_pri_pool_pct` bytes for high-pri cache entries. If `high_pri_pool_pct` is zero, the cache degenerates to normal LRU cache.
Context: If we are to put index and filter blocks into RocksDB block cache, index/filter block can be swap out too early. We want to add an option to RocksDB to reserve some capacity in block cache just for index/filter blocks, to mitigate the issue.
In later diffs I'll update block based table reader to use the interface to cache index/filter blocks at high priority, and expose the option to `DBOptions` and make it dynamic changeable.
Test Plan: unit test.
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, sdong, lightmark
Reviewed By: lightmark
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, march, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D61977
Summary: ... so that I can include the header and create LRUCache specific tests for D61977
Test Plan:
make check
Reviewers: lightmark, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D62145
Summary: preparation for detecting Cache type. If SimCache, we then may trigger some command like "setSimCapacity()" with setOptions()
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yiwu, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D61953
Summary: Refactor cache.cc so that I can plugin clock cache (D55581). Mainly move `ShardedCache` to separate file, move `LRUHandle` back to cache.cc and rename it lru_cache.cc.
Test Plan:
make check -j64
Reviewers: lightmark, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D59655
Summary: Cache shard bit 4 is sometimes too small and 6 is a more common value picked by users. Make that default. It shouldn't hurt much to change options.max_file_opening_threads default to be 16, which will reduce the worst case DB open time.
Test Plan: Run all existing tests.
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, igor, andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: andrewkr, MarkCallaghan, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D55047
Summary:
When a block based table file is opened, if prefetch_index_and_filter is true, it will prefetch the index and filter blocks, putting them into the block cache.
What this feature adds: when a L0 block based table file is opened, if pin_l0_filter_and_index_blocks_in_cache is true in the options (and prefetch_index_and_filter is true), then the filter and index blocks aren't released back to the block cache at the end of BlockBasedTableReader::Open(). Instead the table reader takes ownership of them, hence pinning them, ie. the LRU cache will never push them out. Meanwhile in the table reader, further accesses will not hit the block cache, thus avoiding lock contention.
Test Plan:
'export TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/ && DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 OPT=-g make all valgrind_check -j32' is OK.
I didn't run the Java tests, I don't have Java set up on my devserver.
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D56133
Summary:
Cache to have an option to fail Cache::Insert() when full. Update call sites to check status and handle error.
I totally have no idea what's correct behavior of all the call sites when they encounter error. Please let me know if you see something wrong or more unit test is needed.
Test Plan: make check -j32, see tests pass.
Reviewers: anthony, yhchiang, andrewkr, IslamAbdelRahman, kradhakrishnan, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D54705
Summary: Add 2 new counters BLOCK_CACHE_BYTES_WRITE, BLOCK_CACHE_BYTES_READ to keep track of how many bytes were written to the cache and how many bytes that we read from cache
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48195
Summary:
Add the funcion Cache.GetPinnedUsage() to return the memory size of entries
that are in use by the system (that is, all the entries not in the LRU list).
Test Plan:
Run ./cache_test and examine PinnedUsageTest.
Reviewers: tnovak, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40305
Summary: Added keyword override for SetCapacity()
Test Plan: Fixes build
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D37647
Summary:
When new capacity is larger than existing capacity, simply update the capacity to the new valie
When new capacity is less than existing capacity, but more than the usage, simply update the capacity to new value
When new capacity is less than the existing capacity and existing usage both, try to purge entries in LRU if feasible to make usage < capacity
Test Plan: Created unit tests in cache_test.cc
Reviewers: sdong, rven, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D37527
Summary: It is no longer used by the implementation, so we should also remove it from the public API.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34971
Summary:
When using latest clang (3.6 or 3.7/trunck) rocksdb is failing with many errors. Almost all of them are missing override errors. This diff adds missing override keyword. No manual changes.
Prerequisites: bear and clang 3.5 build with extra tools
```lang=bash
% USE_CLANG=1 bear make all # generate a compilation database http://clang.llvm.org/docs/JSONCompilationDatabase.html
% clang-modernize -p . -include . -add-override
% make format
```
Test Plan:
Make sure all tests are passing.
```lang=bash
% #Use default fb code clang.
% make check
```
Verify less error and no missing override errors.
```lang=bash
% # Have trunk clang present in path.
% ROCKSDB_NO_FBCODE=1 CC=clang CXX=clang++ make
```
Reviewers: igor, kradhakrishnan, rven, meyering, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34077
Summary:
Currently, blocks which have more than one reference (ie referenced by something other than cache itself) are evicted from cache. This doesn't make much sense:
- blocks are still in RAM, so the RAM usage reported by the cache is incorrect
- if the same block is needed by another iterator, it will be loaded and decompressed again
This diff changes the reference counting scheme a bit. Previously, if the cache contained the block, this was accounted for in its refcount. After this change, the refcount is only used to track external references. There is a boolean flag which indicates whether or not the block is contained in the cache.
This diff also changes how LRU list is used. Previously, both hashtable and the LRU list contained all blocks. After this change, the LRU list contains blocks with the refcount==0, ie those which can be evicted from the cache.
Note that this change still allows for cache to grow beyond its capacity. This happens when all blocks are pinned (ie refcount>0). This is consistent with the current behavior. The cache's insert function never fails. I spent lots of time trying to make table_reader and other places work with the insert which might failed. It turned out to be pretty hard. It might really destabilize some customers, so finally, I decided against doing this.
table_cache_remove_scan_count_limit option will be unneeded after this change, but I will remove it in the following diff, if this one gets approved
Test Plan: Ran tests, made sure they pass
Reviewers: sdong, ljin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D25503
Summary:
We need to turn on -Wshorten-64-to-32 for mobile. See D1671432 (internal phabricator) for details.
This diff turns on the warning flag and fixes all the errors. There were also some interesting errors that I might call bugs, especially in plain table. Going forward, I think it makes sense to have this flag turned on and be very very careful when converting 64-bit to 32-bit variables.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: ljin, rven, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: bobbaldwin, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28689
Summary:
...and fix all the errors :)
Jim suggested turning on -Wshadow because it helped him fix number of critical bugs in fbcode. I think it's a good idea to be -Wshadow clean.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27711
Summary: Added a method that executes a callback on every cache entry.
Test Plan: added a unit test
Reviewers: haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18441
Summary: On a shutdown, freeing memory takes a long time. If we're shutting down, we don't really care about memory leaks. I added a call to Cache that will avoid freeing all objects in cache.
Test Plan:
I created a script to test the speedup and demonstrate how to use the call: https://phabricator.fb.com/P3864368
Clean shutdown took 7.2 seconds, while fast and dirty one took 6.3 seconds. Unfortunately, the speedup is not that big, but should be bigger with bigger block_cache. I have set up the capacity to 80GB, but the script filled up only ~7GB.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, MarkCallaghan, xjin
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15069
Summary: this diff only replace the cases when we need to frequently create vector with small amount of entries. This diff doesn't aim to improve performance of a specific area, but more like a small scale test for the autovector and see how it works in real life.
Test Plan:
make check
I also ran the performance tests, however there is no performance gain/loss. All performance numbers are pretty much the same before/after the change.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14985
Summary:
By disassemble the function, we found that the atomic variables do invoke the `lock` that locks the memory bus.
As a tradeoff, we protect the GetUsage by mutex and leave usage_ as plain size_t.
Test Plan: passed `cache_test`
Reviewers: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14667
Summary: This diff will help us to figure out the memory usage for the cache part.
Test Plan: added a new memory usage test for cache
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14559
Summary:
I have ran a get benchmark where all the data is in the cache and observed that most of the time is spent on waiting for lock in LRUCache.
This is an effort to optimize LRUCache.
Test Plan:
The data was loaded with fillseq. Then, I ran a benchmark:
/db_bench --db=/tmp/rocksdb_stat_bench --num=1000000 --benchmarks=readrandom --statistics=1 --use_existing_db=1 --threads=16 --disable_seek_compaction=1 --cache_size=20000000000 --cache_numshardbits=8 --table_cache_numshardbits=8
I ran the benchmark three times. Here are the results:
AFTER THE PATCH: 798072, 803998, 811807
BEFORE THE PATCH: 782008, 815593, 763017
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14571
Summary: This will allow us to access constant via `DB::GetOptions().table_cache.GetCapacity()` or `DB::GetOptions().block_cache.GetCapacity()` since GetOptions() is also constant method.
Summary: The work to make sure mac os compiles rocksdb is not completed yet. But at least we can start cleaning some warnings captured only by g++ from mac os..
Test Plan: ran make in mac os
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14049
Summary:
With this patch, when LRUCache.Insert() is called and the cache is full, it will first try to free up entries whose reference counter is 1 (would become 0 after remo\
ving from the cache). We do it in two passes, in the first pass, we only try to release those unreferenced entries. If we cannot free enough space after traversing t\
he first remove_scan_cnt_ entries, we start from the beginning again and remove those entries being used.
Test Plan: add two unit tests to cover the codes
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb, emayanke, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13377
Summary: Split Unref into two parts -> cheap and expensive. Try to call expensive Unref outside of critical section to decrease lock contention.
Test Plan: unittests
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, kailiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13299
Summary:
Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb. This allows a single
application to link in open-source leveldb code as well as
rocksdb code into the same process.
Test Plan: compile rocksdb
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13287
Summary: Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.
Test Plan:
make clean; make check
make clean; make release
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12489
Summary:
1. The stock LRUCache nukes itself whenever the working set (the total number of entries not released by client at a certain time) is bigger than the cache capacity.
See https://our.dev.facebook.com/intern/tasks/?t=2252281
2. There's a bug in shard calculation leading to segmentation fault when only one shard is needed.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, heyongqiang
Reviewed By: heyongqiang
CC: leveldb, zshao, sheki
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9927
Yi Wu