Summary:
Uniformly use GetByteArrayRegion() instead of GetByteArrayElements()
to copy bytes.
In addition, it can avoid an inefficient ReleaseByteArrayElements()
operation.
Some benefits of GetByteArrayRegion() can be referred to:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/2480493
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9380
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D35135474
Pulled By: jay-zhuang
fbshipit-source-id: a32c1774d37f2d22b9bcd105d83e0bb984b71b54
Summary:
Extend Java RocksDB iterators to support indirect byte buffers, to add to the existing support for direct byte buffers.
Code to distinguish direct/indirect buffers is switched in Java, and a 2nd separate JNI call implemented to support indirect
buffers. Indirect support passes contained buffers using byte[]
There are some Java subclasses of iterator (WBWIIterator, SstFileReaderIterator) which also now have parallel JNI support functions implemented, along with direct/indirect switches in Java methods.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/6282
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9222
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D35115283
Pulled By: jay-zhuang
fbshipit-source-id: f8d5d20b975aef700560fbcc99f707bb028dc42e
Summary:
Fixed all RocksJava test failures in Centos and Alpine 32 bit and 64 bit OSes
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9395
Reviewed By: mrambacher
Differential Revision: D33771987
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: fed91033b8df08f191ad65e1fb745a9264bbfa70
Summary:
This PR exposes the `Iterator::Refresh` method to the Java API by adding it on the `RocksIteratorInterface` interface. There are three concrete implementations: `RocksIterator`, `SstFileReaderIterator`, and `WBWIRocksIterator`. For the first two cases, the JNI side simply delegates to the underlying `Iterator::Refresh` method; in the last case, as it doesn't share an ancestor, and per the discussion in https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/3465, a `Status::NotSupported` exception is thrown.
As the last PR had no activity in a while, I'm opening a new one - I'm completely fine with merging the previous PR if it gets completed before this is reviewed.
Let me know if there's anything missing or anything else I can do 👍
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6573
Reviewed By: cheng-chang
Differential Revision: D20604666
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 4de17df1180c3b87b76cfdd77b674b81fc0563f7
Summary:
When dynamically linking two binaries together, different builds of RocksDB from two sources might cause errors. To provide a tool for user to solve the problem, the RocksDB namespace is changed to a flag which can be overridden in build time.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6433
Test Plan: Build release, all and jtest. Try to build with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE with another flag.
Differential Revision: D19977691
fbshipit-source-id: aa7f2d0972e1c31d75339ac48478f34f6cfcfb3e
Summary:
It is very useful to support direct ByteBuffers in Java. It allows to have zero memory copy and some serializers are using that directly so one do not need to create byte[] array for it.
This change also contains some fixes for Windows JNI build.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2283
Differential Revision: D19834971
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 44173aa02afc9836c5498c592fd1ea95b6086e8e
Summary:
This is a redesign of the API for RocksJava comparators with the aim of improving performance. It also simplifies the class hierarchy.
**NOTE**: This breaks backwards compatibility for existing 3rd party Comparators implemented in Java... so we need to consider carefully which release branches this goes into.
Previously when implementing a comparator in Java the developer had a choice of subclassing either `DirectComparator` or `Comparator` which would use direct and non-direct byte-buffers resepectively (via `DirectSlice` and `Slice`).
In this redesign there we have eliminated the overhead of using the Java Slice classes, and just use `ByteBuffer`s. The `ComparatorOptions` supplied when constructing a Comparator allow you to choose between direct and non-direct byte buffers by setting `useDirect`.
In addition, the `ComparatorOptions` now allow you to choose whether a ByteBuffer is reused over multiple comparator calls, by setting `maxReusedBufferSize > 0`. When buffers are reused, ComparatorOptions provides a choice of mutex type by setting `useAdaptiveMutex`.
---
[JMH benchmarks previously indicated](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6241#issue-356398306) that the difference between C++ and Java for implementing a comparator was ~7x slowdown in Java.
With these changes, when reusing buffers and guarding access to them via mutexes the slowdown is approximately the same. However, these changes offer a new facility to not reuse mutextes, which reduces the slowdown to ~5.5x in Java. We also offer a `thread_local` mechanism for reusing buffers, which reduces slowdown to ~5.2x in Java (closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4425).
These changes also form a good base for further optimisation work such as further JNI lookup caching, and JNI critical.
---
These numbers were captured without jemalloc. With jemalloc, the performance improves for all tests, and the Java slowdown reduces to between 4.8x and 5.x.
```
ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_bytewise thrpt 25 124483.795 ± 2032.443 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_reverse_bytewise thrpt 25 114414.536 ± 3486.156 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 17228.250 ± 1288.546 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16035.865 ± 1248.099 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 21571.500 ± 871.521 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 23613.773 ± 8465.660 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16768.172 ± 5618.489 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 23921.164 ± 8734.742 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 17899.684 ± 839.679 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 22148.316 ± 1215.527 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11311.126 ± 820.602 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11421.311 ± 807.210 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 11554.005 ± 960.556 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 22960.523 ± 1673.421 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 18293.317 ± 1434.601 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 24479.361 ± 2157.306 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 7942.286 ± 626.170 ops/s
ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 11781.955 ± 1019.843 ops/s
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6252
Differential Revision: D19331064
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 1f3b794e6a14162b2c3ffb943e8c0e64a0c03738
Summary:
Current implementation of `current_over_upper_bound_` fails to take into consideration that keys might be invalid in either base iterator or delta iterator. Calling key() in such scenario will lead to assertion failure and runtime errors.
This PR addresses the bug by adding check for valid keys before calling `IsOverUpperBound()`, also added test coverage for iterate_upper_bound usage in BaseDeltaIterator
Also recommit https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4656 (It was reverted earlier due to bugs)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4702
Differential Revision: D13146643
Pulled By: miasantreble
fbshipit-source-id: 6d136929da12d0f2e2a5cea474a8038ec5cdf1d0
Summary:
Currently transaction iterator does not apply `ReadOptions.iterate_upper_bound` when iterating. This PR attempts to fix the problem by having `BaseDeltaIterator` enforcing the upper bound check when iterator state is changed.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4656
Differential Revision: D13039257
Pulled By: miasantreble
fbshipit-source-id: 909eb9f6b4597a4d80418fb139f32ec82c6ec1d1
Summary:
This PR comments out the rest of the unused arguments which allow us to turn on the -Wunused-parameter flag. This is the second part of a codemod relating to https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3557.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3662
Differential Revision: D7426121
Pulled By: Dayvedde
fbshipit-source-id: 223994923b42bd4953eb016a0129e47560f7e352
Summary:
This is an abstraction for working with custom Comparators implemented in native C++ code from Java. Native code must directly extend `rocksdb::Comparator`. When the native code comparator is compiled into the RocksDB codebase, you can then create a Java Class, and JNI stub to wrap it.
Useful if the C++/JNI barrier overhead is too much for your applications comparator performance.
An example is provided in `java/rocksjni/native_comparator_wrapper_test.cc` and `java/src/main/java/org/rocksdb/NativeComparatorWrapperTest.java`.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3334
Differential Revision: D7172605
Pulled By: miasantreble
fbshipit-source-id: e24b7eb267a3bcb6afa214e0379a1d5e8a2ceabe
Summary:
This PR also includes some cleanup, bugfixes and refactoring of the Java API. However these are really pre-cursors on the road to CompactionFilterFactory support.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1241
Differential Revision: D6012778
Pulled By: sagar0
fbshipit-source-id: 0774465940ee99001a78906e4fed4ef57068ad5c
Summary:
As discussed in #2742 , this pull-requests brings the iterator's [SeekForPrev()](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/SeekForPrev) functionality to the java-api. It affects all locations in the code where previously only Seek() was supported.
All code changes are essentially a copy & paste of the already existing implementations for Seek().
**Please Note**: the changes to the C++ code were applied without fully understanding its effect, so please take a closer look. However, since Seek() and SeekForPrev() provide exactly the same signature, I do not expect any mistake here.
The java-tests are extended by new tests for the additional functionality.
Compilation (`make rocksdbjavastatic`) and test (`java/make test`) run without errors.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2747
Differential Revision: D5721011
Pulled By: sagar0
fbshipit-source-id: c1f951cddc321592c70dd2d32bc04892f3f119f8
Summary:
I have manually audited the entire RocksJava code base.
Sorry for the large pull-request, I have broken it down into many small atomic commits though.
My initial intention was to fix the warnings that appear when running RocksJava on Java 8 with `-Xcheck:jni`, for example when running `make jtest` you would see many errors similar to:
```
WARNING in native method: JNI call made without checking exceptions when required to from CallObjectMethod
WARNING in native method: JNI call made without checking exceptions when required to from CallVoidMethod
WARNING in native method: JNI call made without checking exceptions when required to from CallStaticVoidMethod
...
```
A few of those warnings still remain, however they seem to come directly from the JVM and are not directly related to RocksJava; I am in contact with the OpenJDK hostpot-dev mailing list about these - http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-February/025981.html.
As a result of fixing these, I realised we were not r
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1890
Differential Revision: D4591758
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: 7f7fdf4
Summary:
Needed for working with `get` after `merge` on a WBWI.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1093
Differential Revision: D4137978
Pulled By: yhchiang
fbshipit-source-id: e18d50d
Summary:
The option bottommost_level_compaction was introduced lately.
This option breaks the Java API behavior. To prevent the library
from doing so we set that option to a fixed value in Java.
In future we are going to remove that portion and replace the
hardcoded options using a more flexible way.
Fixed bug introduced by WriteBatchWithIndex Patch
Lately icanadi changed the behavior of WriteBatchWithIndex.
See commit: 821cff114e
This commit solves problems introduced by above mentioned commit.
Test Plan:
make rocksdbjava
make jtest
Reviewers: adamretter, ankgup87, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: igor, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40647
Jermy Li