Summary:
This diff changes `StatisticsImpl` from a thread-local approach to a core-local one. The goal is to perform faster aggregations, particularly for applications that have many threads. There should be no behavior change.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2258
Differential Revision: D5016258
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 7d4d165b4a91d8110f0409d113d1be91f22d31a9
Summary:
It resets all the ticker and histogram stats to zero. Needed to change the locking a bit since Reset() is the only operation that manipulates multiple tickers/histograms together, and that operation should be seen as atomic by other operations that access tickers/histograms.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2213
Differential Revision: D4952232
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: c0475c3e4c7b940120d53891b69c3091149a0679
Summary:
Move some files under util/ to new directories env/, monitoring/ options/ and cache/
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2090
Differential Revision: D4833681
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: 2fd8bef
Summary: A convience method to atomically get and reset ticker count. I'm wanting to use it to have a thin wrapper to the statistics object to export ticker counts to ODS for LogDevice (since they don't even use fb303).
Test Plan:
test in LogDevice shadow cluster.
https://fburl.com/461868822
Reviewers: andrewkr, yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D64869
Summary:
To reduce contention for atomics when HistogramStats are shared across
threads, this diff makes them thread-specific so updates are faster. This comes
at the expense of slower reads (much less frequent), which now require merging
all histograms. In this diff,
- Thread-specific HistogramImpl is created upon the thread's first measureTime()
- Thread-specific HistogramImpl are merged and deleted upon thread termination or ThreadLocalPtr destruction, whichever comes first
- getHistogramString() and histogramData() merge all histograms, both thread-specific and previously merged ones
Test Plan:
unit tests, ran db_bench and verified histograms look similar
before:
$ TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/ perf record -g ./db_bench --benchmarks=readwhilewriting --statistics --num=1000000 --use_existing_db --threads=64 --cache_size=250000000 --compression_type=lz4
...
+ 7.63% db_bench db_bench [.] rocksdb::HistogramStat::Add
after:
$ TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/ perf record -g ./db_bench --benchmarks=readwhilewriting --statistics --num=1000000 --use_existing_db --threads=64 --cache_size=250000000 --compression_type=lz4
...
+ 0.98% db_bench db_bench [.] rocksdb::HistogramStat::Add
Reviewers: sdong, MarkCallaghan, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D62649
Summary:
The global atomics we previously used for tickers had poor cache performance
since they were typically updated from different threads, causing frequent
invalidations. In this diff,
- recordTick() updates a local ticker value specific to the thread in which it was called
- When a thread exits, its local ticker value is added into merged_sum
- getTickerCount() returns the sum of all threads' local ticker values and the merged_sum
- setTickerCount() resets all threads' local ticker values and sets merged_sum to the value provided by the caller.
In a next diff I will make a similar change for histogram stats.
Test Plan:
before:
$ TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/ perf record -g ./db_bench --benchmarks=readwhilewriting --statistics --num=1000000 --use_existing_db --threads=64 --cache_size=250000000 --compression_type=lz4
$ perf report -g --stdio | grep recordTick
7.59% db_bench db_bench [.] rocksdb::StatisticsImpl::recordTick
...
after:
$ TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/ perf record -g ./db_bench --benchmarks=readwhilewriting --statistics --num=1000000 --use_existing_db --threads=64 --cache_size=250000000 --compression_type=lz4
$ perf report -g --stdio | grep recordTick
1.46% db_bench db_bench [.] rocksdb::StatisticsImpl::recordTick
...
Reviewers: kradhakrishnan, MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: yiwu, andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D62337
Summary:
Make StatisticsImpl being able to forward stats to provided statistics
implementation. The main purpose is to allow us to collect internal
stats in the future even when user supplies custom statistics
implementation. It avoids intrumenting 2 sets of stats collection code.
One immediate use case is tuning advisor, which needs to collect some
internal stats, users may not be interested.
Test Plan:
ran db_bench and see stats show up at the end of run
Will run make all check since some tests rely on statistics
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20145
Summary:
Make StatisticsImpl being able to forward stats to provided statistics
implementation. The main purpose is to allow us to collect internal
stats in the future even when user supplies custom statistics
implementation. It avoids intrumenting 2 sets of stats collection code.
One immediate use case is tuning advisor, which needs to collect some
internal stats, users may not be interested.
Test Plan:
ran db_bench and see stats show up at the end of run
Will run make all check since some tests rely on statistics
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20145
Summary: as title
Test Plan:
asan_check
will post results later
Reviewers: haobo, igor, dhruba, sdong
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16257
Summary:
For some reason, D15099 caused a big performance regression: https://fburl.com/16059000
After digging a bit, I figured out that the reason was that std::atomic_uint_fast64_t was allocated in an array. When I switched from an array to vector, the QPS returned to the previous level. I'm not sure why this is happening, but this diff seems to fix the performance regression.
Test Plan: I ran the regression script, observed the performance going back to normal
Reviewers: tnovak, kailiu, haobo
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15375
Summary: I'm separating code-cleanup part of https://reviews.facebook.net/D14517. This will make D14517 easier to understand and this diff easier to review.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, sdong, dhruba, tnovak
Reviewed By: tnovak
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15099
Siying Dong