Summary:
<This diff is for Column Family branch>
Sharing some of the work I've done so far. This diff compiles and passes the tests.
The biggest change is in options.h - I broke down Options into two parts - DBOptions and ColumnFamilyOptions. DBOptions is DB-specific (env, create_if_missing, block_cache, etc.) and ColumnFamilyOptions is column family-specific (all compaction options, compresion options, etc.). Note that this does not break backwards compatibility at all.
Further, I created DBWithColumnFamily which inherits DB interface and adds new functions with column family support. Clients can transparently switch to DBWithColumnFamily and it will not break their backwards compatibility.
There are few methods worth checking out: ListColumnFamilies(), MultiNewIterator(), MultiGet() and GetSnapshot(). [GetSnapshot() returns the snapshot across all column families for now - I think that's what we agreed on]
Finally, I made small changes to WriteBatch so we are able to atomically insert data across column families.
Please provide feedback.
Test Plan: make check works, the code is backward compatible
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu, emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14445
Summary:
This is the last diff that adds the property block to plain table.
The format resembles that of the block-based table: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Rocksdb-table-format
[data block]
[meta block 1: stats block]
[meta block 2: future extended block]
...
[meta block K: future extended block] (we may add more meta blocks in the future)
[metaindex block]
[index block: we only have the placeholder here, we can add persistent index block in the future]
[Footer: contains magic number, handle to metaindex block and index block]
<end_of_file>
Test Plan: extended existing property block test.
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14523
Summary: This diff will help us to figure out the memory usage for the cache part.
Test Plan: added a new memory usage test for cache
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14559
Summary: In get operations, merge_operands is only used in few cases. Lazily initialize it can reduce average latency in some cases
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: igor, nkg-, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14415
Conflicts:
db/db_impl.cc
db/memtable.cc
Summary: as title
Test Plan: dynamic_bloom_test
Reviewers: dhruba, sdong, kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14385
Summary: We now delete backups with newer sequence number, so the clients don't have to handle confusing situations when they restore from backup.
Test Plan: added a unit test
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14547
Summary: This will allow us to access constant via `DB::GetOptions().table_cache.GetCapacity()` or `DB::GetOptions().block_cache.GetCapacity()` since GetOptions() is also constant method.
Summary:
In this diff I present you BackupableDB v1. You can easily use it to backup your DB and it will do incremental snapshots for you.
Let's first describe how you would use BackupableDB. It's inheriting StackableDB interface so you can easily construct it with your DB object -- it will add a method RollTheSnapshot() to the DB object. When you call RollTheSnapshot(), current snapshot of the DB will be stored in the backup dir. To restore, you can just call RestoreDBFromBackup() on a BackupableDB (which is a static method) and it will restore all files from the backup dir. In the next version, it will even support automatic backuping every X minutes.
There are multiple things you can configure:
1. backup_env and db_env can be different, which is awesome because then you can easily backup to HDFS or wherever you feel like.
2. sync - if true, it *guarantees* backup consistency on machine reboot
3. number of snapshots to keep - this will keep last N snapshots around if you want, for some reason, be able to restore from an earlier snapshot. All the backuping is done in incremental fashion - if we already have 00010.sst, we will not copy it again. *IMPORTANT* -- This is based on assumption that 00010.sst never changes - two files named 00010.sst from the same DB will always be exactly the same. Is this true? I always copy manifest, current and log files.
4. You can decide if you want to flush the memtables before you backup, or you're fine with backing up the log files -- either way, you get a complete and consistent view of the database at a time of backup.
5. More things you can find in BackupableDBOptions
Here is the directory structure I use:
backup_dir/CURRENT_SNAPSHOT - just 4 bytes holding the latest snapshot
0, 1, 2, ... - files containing serialized version of each snapshot - containing a list of files
files/*.sst - sst files shared between snapshots - if one snapshot references 00010.sst and another one needs to backup it from the DB, it will just reference the same file
files/ 0/, 1/, 2/, ... - snapshot directories containing private snapshot files - current, manifest and log files
All the files are ref counted and deleted immediatelly when they get out of scope.
Some other stuff in this diff:
1. Added GetEnv() method to the DB. Discussed with @haobo and we agreed that it seems right thing to do.
2. Fixed StackableDB interface. The way it was set up before, I was not able to implement BackupableDB.
Test Plan:
I have a unittest, but please don't look at this yet. I just hacked it up to help me with debugging. I will write a lot of good tests and update the diff.
Also, `make asan_check`
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, emayanke
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, haobo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14295
Summary: In get operations, merge_operands is only used in few cases. Lazily initialize it can reduce average latency in some cases
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: igor, nkg-, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14415
Summary: This change will allow other table to reuse the code for meta blocks.
Test Plan: all existing unit tests passed
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14475
Summary: As title
Test Plan: make clean and make
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14469
Summary: This would enable rocksdb users to get the db identity without depending on implementation details(storing that in IDENTITY file)
Test Plan: db/db_test (has identity checks)
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, igor, kailiu
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14463
Summary:
PlainTableReader to use a more customized hash table. This patch assumes the SST file is smaller than 2GB:
(1) Every bucket uses 32-bit integer
(2) no key is stored in bucket
(3) use the first bit of the bucket value to distinguish it points to the file offset or a second level index.
This index schema fits the use case that most of prefixes have very small number of keys
Test Plan: plain_table_db_test
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: nkg-, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14343
Summary:
Let's get rid of TransformRep and it's children. We have confirmed that HashSkipListRep works better with multifeed, so there is no benefit to keeping this around.
This diff is mostly just deleting references to obsoleted functions. I also have a diff for fbcode that we'll need to push when we switch to new release.
I had to expose HashSkipListRepFactory in the client header files because db_impl.cc needs access to GetTransform() function for SanitizeOptions.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, sdong
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14397
Summary: As title. Especially, HashSkipListRepFactory will be able to specify a relatively small height, to reduce the memory overhead of one skiplist per bucket.
Test Plan: make check and test it on leaf4
Reviewers: dhruba, sdong, kailiu
CC: reconnect.grayhat, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14307
Summary: We need access to options for BackupableDB
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, reconnect.grayhat
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14331
Summary: This is part of https://reviews.facebook.net/D14295 -- smaller diff that is easier to review
Test Plan: make asan_check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb, kailiu, reconnect.grayhat
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14301
Summary: liveness of the statistics object is already ensured by the shared pointer in DB options. There's no reason to pass again shared pointer among internal functions. Raw pointer is sufficient and efficient.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, MarkCallaghan, igor
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, reconnect.grayhat
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14289
Summary:
Provide a framework to profile a query in detail to figure out latency bottleneck. Currently, in Get(), Put() and iterators, 2-3 simple timing is used. We can easily add more profile counters to the framework later.
Test Plan: Enable this profiling in seveal existing tests.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu, emayanke, vamsi, igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14001
Conflicts:
table/merger.cc
Summary:
Provide a framework to profile a query in detail to figure out latency bottleneck. Currently, in Get(), Put() and iterators, 2-3 simple timing is used. We can easily add more profile counters to the framework later.
Test Plan: Enable this profiling in seveal existing tests.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu, emayanke, vamsi, igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14001
Summary:
For prefix mem tables, encoding mem table key may be unnecessary if the prefix doesn't have any key. This patch is a little bit hacky but I want to try out the performance gain of removing this lazy initialization.
In longer term, we might want to revisit the way we abstract mem tables implementations.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, igor, kailiu
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14265
Summary:
A Simple plain table format. No block structure. When creating the table reader, scanning the full table to create indexes.
Test Plan:Add unit test
Reviewers:haobo,dhruba,kailiu
CC:
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Summary:
Previously we introduce a `flush_block_policy_factory` in Options, however, that options is strongly releated to Table based tables.
It will make more sense to move it to block based table's own factory class.
Test Plan: make check to pass existing tests
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14211
Summary:
The primary motivation of the changes is to make it easier to figure out the inside of the tables.
* rename "table stats" to "table properties" since now we have more than "integers" to store in the property block.
* Add filter block size to the basic table properties.
* Whenever a table is built, we'll log the table properties (the sample output is in Test Plan).
* Make an api to expose deleted keys.
Test Plan:
Passed all existing test. and the sample output of table stats:
==================================================================
Basic Properties
------------------------------------------------------------------
# data blocks: 1
# entries: 1
raw key size: 9
raw average key size: 9
raw value size: 9
raw average value size: 0
data block size: 25
index block size: 27
filter block size: 18
(estimated) table size: 70
filter policy: rocksdb.BuiltinBloomFilter
==================================================================
User collected properties: InternalKeyPropertiesCollector
------------------------------------------------------------------
kDeletedKeys: 1
==================================================================
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14187
Summary: This diff invoves some more complicated issues in the posix environment.
Test Plan: works under mac os. will need to verify dev box.
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14061
Summary:
Created a unittest that verifies that automatic deletion performed by PurgeObsoleteFiles() works correctly.
Also, few small fixes on the logic part -- call version_set_->GetObsoleteFiles() in FindObsoleteFiles() instead of on some arbitrary positions.
Test Plan: Created a unit test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, nkg-
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14079
Summary: This diff leverage the existing block cache and extend it to cache index/filter block.
Test Plan:
Added new tests in db_test and table_test
The correctness is checked by:
1. make check
2. make valgrind_check
Performance is test by:
1. 10 times of build_tools/regression_build_test.sh on two versions of rocksdb before/after the code change. Test results suggests no significant difference between them. For the two key operatons `overwrite` and `readrandom`, the average iops are both 20k and ~260k, with very small variance).
2. db_stress.
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, haobo, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13167
Summary: The work to make sure mac os compiles rocksdb is not completed yet. But at least we can start cleaning some warnings captured only by g++ from mac os..
Test Plan: ran make in mac os
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14049
Summary:
@haobo's suggestions from https://reviews.facebook.net/D13827
Renaming some variables, deprecating purge_log_after_flush, changing for loop into auto for loop.
I have not implemented deleting objects outside of mutex yet because it would require a big code change - we would delete object in db_impl, which currently does not know anything about object because it's defined in version_edit.h (FileMetaData). We should do it at some point, though.
Test Plan: Ran deletefile_test
Reviewers: haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, haobo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14025
Summary:
Changed leveldb documentation with rocksdb in doc/index.html. Added some of the important options from options.h to doc.
Also removed benchmark files and impl.h, since this is all replaced by RocksDB wikis.
Test Plan: -
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, emayanke, sdong
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13977
Summary: In our project, when writing to the database, we want to form the value as the concatenation of a small header and a larger payload. It's a shame to have to copy the payload just so we can give RocksDB API a linear view of the value. Since RocksDB makes a copy internally, it's easy to support gather writes.
Test Plan: write_batch_test, new test case
Reviewers: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13947
Summary:
Here's one solution we discussed on speeding up FindObsoleteFiles. Keep a set of all files in DBImpl and update the set every time we create a file. I probably missed few other spots where we create a file.
It might speed things up a bit, but makes code uglier. I don't really like it.
Much better approach would be to abstract all file handling to a separate class. Think of it as layer between DBImpl and Env. Having a separate class deal with file namings and deletion would benefit both code cleanliness (especially with huge DBImpl) and speed things up. It will take a huge effort to do this, though.
Let's discuss offline today.
Test Plan: Ran ./db_stress, verified that files are getting deleted
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, emayanke
Reviewed By: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13827
Summary: What @haobo done with TransformRep, now in TransformRepNoLock. Similar implementation, except that I made DynamicIterator a subclass of Iterator which makes me have less iterator initializations.
Test Plan: ./prefix_test. Seeing huge savings vs. TransformRep again!
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, haobo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13953
Summary: Allow block based table to configure the way flushing the blocks. This feature will allow us to add support for prefix-aligned block.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13875
Summary:
Added a new call LogFlush() that flushes the log contents to the OS buffers. We never call it with lock held.
We call it once for every Read/Write and often in compaction/flush process so the frequency should not be a problem.
Test Plan: db_test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, emayanke
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13935
Summary: Added a prefix_seek flag in ReadOptions to indicate that Seek is prefix aware(might not return data with different prefix), and also not bound to a specific prefix. Multiple Seeks and range scans can be invoked on the same iterator. If a specific prefix is specified, this flag will be ignored. Just a quick prototype that works for PrefixHashRep, the new lockless memtable could be easily extended with this support too.
Test Plan: test it on Leaf
Reviewers: dhruba, kailiu, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13929
Summary:
Archive cleaning will still happen every WAL_ttl seconds
but archived logs will be deleted only if archive size
is greater then a WAL_size_limit value.
Empty archived logs will be deleted evety WAL_ttl.
Test Plan:
1. Unit tests pass.
2. Benchmark.
Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu, igor
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13869
Summary:
I'm sending this diff together with https://reviews.facebook.net/D13881 because it didn't allow me to send only the array one.
Here I also replaced unordered_map with just an array of shared_ptrs. This elminated all the locks.
I will run the new benchmark and post the results here.
Test Plan: db_test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13893
Igor Canadi