Summary: It confuses some compilers to have slice.cc under multiple directories. Merge them.
Test Plan: Run existing tests
Reviewers: andrewkr, yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: leveldb, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D59409
Summary: Currently, if users define both of full key bloom and prefix bloom in SST files. During Get(), if full key bloom shows the key may exist, we still go ahead and check prefix bloom. This is wasteful. If bloom filter for full keys exists, we should always ignore prefix bloom in Get().
Test Plan: Run existing tests
Reviewers: yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: leveldb, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57825
Summary:
memtable_prefix_bloom_probes is not a critical option. Remove it to reduce number of options.
It's easier for users to make mistakes with memtable_prefix_bloom_bits, turn it to memtable_prefix_bloom_bits_ratio
Test Plan: Run all existing tests
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: gunnarku, yoshinorim, MarkCallaghan, leveldb, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D59199
Summary: Backup options file to private directory
Test Plan:
backupable_db_test.cc, BackupOptions
Modify DB options by calling OpenDB for 3 times. Check the latest options file is in the right place. Also check no redundent files are backuped.
Reviewers: andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba, andrewkr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D59373
Summary:
Add a test to detect that when WAL gets truncated,
seq no's are checked to be contiguous.
This test is put in ColumnFamilyTest as it has the necessary
infrastructure/functions for flushing column families, which
we use to ensure 2 active WAL files
Test Plan:
This is a test, no feature has been added.
This test fails today and hence disabled
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: lgalanis, dhruba, andrewkr, pritamdamania
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D59253
Summary: With `table_options.cache_index_and_filter_blocks = true`, index and filter blocks are stored in block cache. Then people are curious how much of the block cache total size is used by indexes and bloom filters. It will be nice we have a way to report that. It can help people tune performance and plan for optimized hardware setting. We add several enum values for db Statistics. BLOCK_CACHE_INDEX/FILTER_BYTES_INSERT - BLOCK_CACHE_INDEX/FILTER_BYTES_ERASE = current INDEX/FILTER total block size in bytes.
Test Plan:
write a test case called `DBBlockCacheTest.IndexAndFilterBlocksStats`. The result is:
```
[gzh@dev9927.prn1 ~/local/rocksdb] make db_block_cache_test -j64 && ./db_block_cache_test --gtest_filter=DBBlockCacheTest.IndexAndFilterBlocksStats
Makefile:101: Warning: Compiling in debug mode. Don't use the resulting binary in production
GEN util/build_version.cc
make: `db_block_cache_test' is up to date.
Note: Google Test filter = DBBlockCacheTest.IndexAndFilterBlocksStats
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from DBBlockCacheTest
[ RUN ] DBBlockCacheTest.IndexAndFilterBlocksStats
[ OK ] DBBlockCacheTest.IndexAndFilterBlocksStats (689 ms)
[----------] 1 test from DBBlockCacheTest (689 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 1 test from 1 test case ran. (689 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 1 test.
```
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, andrewkr, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D58677
Summary:
MemTableList::current_ could be written by background flush thread and
simultaneously read in the user thread (NumNotFlushed() is used in
SwitchMemtable()). Use the lock to prevent this case. Found the error from tsan.
Related: D58833
Test Plan:
$ OPT=-g COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make -j64 db_test
$ TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/rocksdb ./db_test --gtest_filter=DBTest.RepeatedWritesToSameKey
Reviewers: lightmark, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D59139
* Create a callback for memtable becoming immutable
Create a callback for memtable becoming immutable
Create a callback for memtable becoming immutable
moved notification outside the lock
Move sealed notification to unlocked portion of SwitchMemtable
* fix lite build
Summary:
We see some write stalls because of number of unflushed memtables. With existing logging I couldn't figure out what's happening exactly. See internal task t11446054 for details if interested. This diff adds:
- logging of memtable creation at info level; I wanted it on multiple occasions for different reasons; also include number of immutable memtables,
- logging of number of remaining immutable memtables after a flush.
Test Plan: ran tests
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D58833
Summary: We added more table properties for each SST file, so when using 2KB SST file size, the estimated size of SST files is off by almost half, causing the LSM tree structure not as expected. Fix it by making file size 4x as previously, as well as LSM base size. Also avoid the sleeping based synchronization and turn to use sync points.
Test Plan: Run paralell unit tests multiple times and make sure they always pass.
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, kradhakrishnan
Reviewed By: kradhakrishnan
Subscribers: leveldb, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D58749
Summary: Make CompactionOptionsFIFO a part of mutable_cf_options
Test Plan: UT
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, lgalanis, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D58653
kPointInTimeRecovery is indistinguishable from
kTolerateCorruptedTailRecords in recycle mode since we define
the "end" of the log as the first corrupt record we encounter.
kAbsoluteConsistency doesn't make sense because even a clean
shutdown leaves old junk at the end of the log file.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
If we are in kTolerateCorruptedTailRecords, treat these
errors as the end of the log. This is particularly
important for recycled logs, where we will regularly see
corrupted headers (bad length or checksum) when replaying
a log. If we are aligned with a block boundary or get lucky,
we will land on an old header and see the log number
mismatch, but more commonly we will land midway through
some previous block and record and effectively see noise.
These must be treated as the end of the log in order for
recycling to work.
This makes the LogTest.Recycle/1 test pass.
We also modify a number of existing tests because the
recycled log files behave fundamentally differently in that
they always stop when they reach the first bad record.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
Summary:
A couple of notes from the diff:
- The namespace block I added at the top of table_properties_collector.cc was in reaction to an issue i was having with PutVarint64 and reusing the "val" string. I'm not sure this is the cleanest way of doing this, but abstracting this out at least results in the correct behavior.
- I chose "rocksdb.merge.operands" as the property name. I am open to suggestions for better names.
- The change to sst_dump_tool.cc seems a bit inelegant to me. Is there a better way to do the if-else block?
Test Plan:
I added a test case in table_properties_collector_test.cc. It adds two merge operands and checks to make sure that both of them are reflected by GetMergeOperands. It also checks to make sure the wasPropertyPresent bool is properly set in the method.
Running both of these tests should pass:
./table_properties_collector_test
./sst_dump_test
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D58119
Summary:
This is a part of effort to reduce the size of db_test.cc. We move the following tests to a separate file `db_io_failure_test.cc`:
* DropWrites
* DropWritesFlush
* NoSpaceCompactRange
* NonWritableFileSystem
* ManifestWriteError
* PutFailsParanoid
Test Plan: Run `make check` to see if the tests are working properly.
Reviewers: sdong, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D58341
Summary:
NotifyOnCompactionCompleted can unlock the mutex.
That mean that we can schedule a background compaction that will start before we ReleaseCompactionFiles().
Test Plan:
added unittest
existing unittest
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: yoshinorim, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D58065
Summary: This tests that a prepared transaction is not lost after several crashes, restarts, and memtable flushes.
Test Plan: TwoPhaseLongPrepareTest
Reviewers: sdong
Subscribers: hermanlee4, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D58185
Summary:
- Make sure we clean up recovered_transactions_ on DBImpl destructor
- delete leaked txns and env in TransactionTest
Test Plan: Run transaction_test under valgrind
Reviewers: sdong, andrewkr, yhchiang, horuff
Reviewed By: horuff
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D58263
Summary:
Added a new abstraction to cache page to RocksDB designed for the read
cache use.
RocksDB current block cache is more of an object cache. For the persistent read cache
project, what we need is a page cache equivalent. This changes adds a cache
abstraction to RocksDB to cache pages called PersistentCache. PersistentCache can cache
uncompressed pages or raw pages (content as in filesystem). The user can
choose to operate PersistentCache either in COMPRESSED or UNCOMPRESSED mode.
Blame Rev:
Test Plan: Run unit tests
Reviewers: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D55707
Summary: DBTestXactLogIterator.TransactionLogIterator was failing due the sequence gaps. This was caused by an off-by-one error when calculating the new sequence number after recovering from logs.
Test Plan: db_log_iter_test
Reviewers: andrewkr
Subscribers: andrewkr, hermanlee4, dhruba, IslamAbdelRahman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D58053
Summary:
GetObsoleteFiles() and LogAndApply() functions modify obsolete_manifests_ vector
we need to make sure that the mutex is held when we modify the obsolete_manifests_
Test Plan: run the test under TSAN
Reviewers: andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D58011
Summary:
1. prepare()
2. crash
3. recover
4. commit()
5. crash
6. data is lost
This is due to the transaction data still only residing in the WAL but because the logs were flushed on the first recovery the data is ignored on the second recovery. We must scan all logs found on recovery and only ignore redundant data at the time of replay. It is not possible to know which logs still contain relevant data at time of recovery. We cannot simply ignore a log because all of the non-2pc data it contains has already been written to L0.
The changes made to MemTableInserter are to ensure that prepared sections are still recovered even if all of the non-2pc data in that log has already been flushed to L0.
Test Plan: Provided test.
Reviewers: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, hermanlee4, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57729
Summary:
Consider the following WAL with 4 batch entries prefixed with their sequence at time of memtable insert.
[1: BEGIN_PREPARE, PUT, PUT, PUT, PUT, END_PREPARE(a)]
[1: BEGIN_PREPARE, PUT, PUT, PUT, PUT, END_PREPARE(b)]
[4: COMMIT(a)]
[7: COMMIT(b)]
The first two batches do not consume any sequence numbers so are both prefixed with seq=1.
For 2pc commit, memtable insertion takes place before COMMIT batch is written to WAL.
We can see that sequence number consumption takes place between WAL entries giving us the seemingly sparse sequence prefix for WAL entries.
This is a valid WAL.
Because with 2PC markers one WriteBatch points to another batch containing its inserts a writebatch can consume more or less sequence numbers than the number of sequence consuming entries that it contains.
We can see that, given the entries in the WAL, 6 sequence ids were consumed. Yet on recovery the maximum sequence consumed would be 7 + 3 (the number of sequence numbers consumed by COMMIT(b))
So, now upon recovery we must track the actual consumption of sequence numbers.
In the provided scenario there will be no sequence gaps, but it is possible to produce a sequence gap. This should not be a problem though. correct?
Test Plan: provided test.
Reviewers: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, leveldb, dhruba, hermanlee4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57645
Summary:
This diff is built on top of WriteBatch modification: https://reviews.facebook.net/D54093 and adds the required functionality to rocksdb core necessary for rocksdb to support 2PC.
modfication of DBImpl::WriteImpl()
- added two arguments *uint64_t log_used = nullptr, uint64_t log_ref = 0;
- *log_used is an output argument which will return the log number which the incoming batch was inserted into, 0 if no WAL insert took place.
- log_ref is a supplied log_number which all memtables inserted into will reference after the batch insert takes place. This number will reside in 'FindMinPrepLogReferencedByMemTable()' until all Memtables insertinto have flushed.
- Recovery/writepath is now aware of prepared batches and commit and rollback markers.
Test Plan: There is currently no test on this diff. All testing of this functionality takes place in the Transaction layer/diff but I will add some testing.
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Subscribers: leveldb, santoshb, andrewkr, vasilep, dhruba, hermanlee4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D56919
Summary: Adds three new WriteBatch data types: Prepare(xid), Commit(xid), Rollback(xid). Prepare(xid) should precede the (single) operation to which is applies. There can obviously be multiple Prepare(xid) markers. There should only be one Rollback(xid) or Commit(xid) marker yet not both. None of this logic is currently enforced and will most likely be implemented further up such as in the memtableinserter. All three markers are similar to PutLogData in that they are writebatch meta-data, ie stored but not counted. All three markers differ from PutLogData in that they will actually be written to disk. As for WriteBatchWithIndex, Prepare, Commit, Rollback are all implemented just as PutLogData and none are tested just as PutLogData.
Test Plan: single unit test in write_batch_test.
Reviewers: hermanlee4, sdong, anthony
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba, vasilep, andrewkr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57867
Summary:
Add a new option that can be used to set a specific compression algorithm for bottommost level.
This option will only affect levels larger than base level.
I have also updated CompactionJobInfo to include the compression algorithm used in compaction
Test Plan:
added new unittest
existing unittests
Reviewers: andrewkr, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: lightmark, andrewkr, dhruba, yoshinorim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57669
Summary: Currently we estimate bytes needed for compaction by assuming fanout value to be level multiplier. It overestimates when size of a level exceeds the target by large. We estimate by the ratio of actual sizes in levels instead.
Test Plan: Fix existing test cases and add a new one.
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, leveldb, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57789
Summary: Fixing error with win build where we compare int64_t with size_t.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57885
Summary: This is to provide a way for users to skip prefix bloom in point look-up.
Test Plan: Add a new unit test scenario.
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: leveldb, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57747
Summary: This test is failing under valgrind because we dont delete the Env that we allocated
Test Plan: run the test under valgrind
Reviewers: andrewkr, yhchiang, yiwu, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57693
Summary: Fixing lite build broke in unit test. `FilesPerLevel()` depends on `DB::GetProperty()`, which lite build doesn't support.
Test Plan: OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check -j64
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57651
Summary:
Add an option `iterator_readahead_size` to `ReadOptions` to enable
configurable readahead for iterators similar to the corresponding
option for compaction.
Test Plan:
```
make commit_prereq
```
Reviewers: kumar.rangarajan, ott, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: yiwu, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D55419
Summary: We should not use IterKey::SetKey with copy = false except if we are pinning the iterator thru it's life time, otherwise we may release the temporarily pinned blocks and in this case the IterKey will be pointing to freed memory
Test Plan: added a new test
Reviewers: sdong, andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57561
Using explicit 64-bit type in conditional in platforms above 32-bits
This appears to be necessary on Mac OSX as std::conditional does not appear to short circuit and evaluates the third template arg
Making the third template arg be 64 bits explicitly works around this problem and will work on both 32 bit and 64+ bit platforms.
Summary: GetCurrentMutableCFOptions() can only be called when DB mutex is held so we cannot call it in CompactionJob::ProcessKeyValueCompaction() since it's not holding the db mutex
Test Plan: make check -j64
Reviewers: sdong, andrewkr
Reviewed By: andrewkr
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57471
sdong